NO proof of prog.inttrs # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty Termination of the given IRSwT could be disproven: (0) IRSwT (1) IRSFormatTransformerProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (2) IRSwT (3) IRSwTTerminationDigraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 74 ms] (4) IRSwT (5) IntTRSCompressionProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (6) IRSwT (7) FilterProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (8) IntTRS (9) IntTRSNonPeriodicNontermProof [COMPLETE, 4 ms] (10) NO ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: Rules: f1_0_main_Load(arg1, arg2) -> f31_0_loop_InvokeMethod(arg1P, arg2P) :|: arg2 = arg1P && -1 <= arg2 - 1 && 0 <= arg1 - 1 f31_0_loop_InvokeMethod(x, x1) -> f31_0_loop_InvokeMethod(x2, x3) :|: x = x2 __init(x4, x5) -> f1_0_main_Load(x6, x7) :|: 0 <= 0 Start term: __init(arg1, arg2) ---------------------------------------- (1) IRSFormatTransformerProof (EQUIVALENT) Reformatted IRS to match normalized format (transformed away non-linear left-hand sides, !=, / and %). ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: Rules: f1_0_main_Load(arg1, arg2) -> f31_0_loop_InvokeMethod(arg1P, arg2P) :|: arg2 = arg1P && -1 <= arg2 - 1 && 0 <= arg1 - 1 f31_0_loop_InvokeMethod(x, x1) -> f31_0_loop_InvokeMethod(x2, x3) :|: x = x2 __init(x4, x5) -> f1_0_main_Load(x6, x7) :|: 0 <= 0 Start term: __init(arg1, arg2) ---------------------------------------- (3) IRSwTTerminationDigraphProof (EQUIVALENT) Constructed termination digraph! Nodes: (1) f1_0_main_Load(arg1, arg2) -> f31_0_loop_InvokeMethod(arg1P, arg2P) :|: arg2 = arg1P && -1 <= arg2 - 1 && 0 <= arg1 - 1 (2) f31_0_loop_InvokeMethod(x, x1) -> f31_0_loop_InvokeMethod(x2, x3) :|: x = x2 (3) __init(x4, x5) -> f1_0_main_Load(x6, x7) :|: 0 <= 0 Arcs: (1) -> (2) (2) -> (2) (3) -> (1) This digraph is fully evaluated! ---------------------------------------- (4) Obligation: Termination digraph: Nodes: (1) f31_0_loop_InvokeMethod(x, x1) -> f31_0_loop_InvokeMethod(x2, x3) :|: x = x2 Arcs: (1) -> (1) This digraph is fully evaluated! ---------------------------------------- (5) IntTRSCompressionProof (EQUIVALENT) Compressed rules. ---------------------------------------- (6) Obligation: Rules: f31_0_loop_InvokeMethod(x2:0, x1:0) -> f31_0_loop_InvokeMethod(x2:0, x3:0) :|: TRUE ---------------------------------------- (7) FilterProof (EQUIVALENT) Used the following sort dictionary for filtering: f31_0_loop_InvokeMethod(VARIABLE, VARIABLE) Replaced non-predefined constructor symbols by 0. ---------------------------------------- (8) Obligation: Rules: f31_0_loop_InvokeMethod(x2:0, x1:0) -> f31_0_loop_InvokeMethod(x2:0, x3:0) :|: TRUE ---------------------------------------- (9) IntTRSNonPeriodicNontermProof (COMPLETE) Normalized system to the following form: f(pc, x2:0, x1:0) -> f(1, x2:0, x3:0) :|: pc = 1 && TRUE Proved unsatisfiability of the following formula, indicating that the system is never left after entering: (((run2_0 = ((1 * 1)) and run2_1 = ((run1_1 * 1)) and run2_2 = ((run1_3 * 1))) and (((run1_0 * 1)) = ((1 * 1)) and T)) and !(((run2_0 * 1)) = ((1 * 1)) and T)) Proved satisfiability of the following formula, indicating that the system is entered at least once: ((run2_0 = ((1 * 1)) and run2_1 = ((run1_1 * 1)) and run2_2 = ((run1_3 * 1))) and (((run1_0 * 1)) = ((1 * 1)) and T)) ---------------------------------------- (10) NO