YES
proof of prog.inttrs
# AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty


Termination of the given IRSwT could be proven:

(0) IRSwT
(1) IRSFormatTransformerProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms]
(2) IRSwT
(3) IRSwTTerminationDigraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 203 ms]
(4) AND
    (5) IRSwT
        (6) IntTRSCompressionProof [EQUIVALENT, 3 ms]
        (7) IRSwT
        (8) TempFilterProof [SOUND, 17 ms]
        (9) IntTRS
        (10) PolynomialOrderProcessor [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms]
        (11) YES
    (12) IRSwT
        (13) IntTRSCompressionProof [EQUIVALENT, 2 ms]
        (14) IRSwT
        (15) TempFilterProof [SOUND, 25 ms]
        (16) IntTRS
        (17) PolynomialOrderProcessor [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms]
        (18) YES


----------------------------------------

(0)
Obligation:
Rules:
f1_0_main_Load(arg1, arg2, arg3) -> f148_0_main_LE(arg1P, arg2P, arg3P) :|: arg1P + arg2P = arg3P && 0 <= arg1 - 1 && -1 <= arg2P - 1 && -1 <= arg2 - 1 && -1 <= arg1P - 1
f148_0_main_LE(x, x1, x2) -> f148_0_main_LE(x3, x4, x5) :|: x - 1 + x1 = x5 && x1 = x4 && x - 1 = x3 && -1 <= x1 - 1 && 0 <= x2 - 1 && 0 <= x - 1
f148_0_main_LE(x6, x7, x8) -> f148_0_main_LE(x9, x10, x11) :|: 0 = x11 && 0 = x10 && 0 = x9 && 0 = x7 && 0 = x6 && 0 <= x8 - 1
f148_0_main_LE(x12, x13, x14) -> f148_0_main_LE(x15, x16, x17) :|: x13 - 1 = x17 && x13 - 1 = x16 && 0 = x15 && 0 = x12 && 0 <= x13 - 1 && 0 <= x14 - 1
__init(x18, x19, x20) -> f1_0_main_Load(x21, x22, x23) :|: 0 <= 0
Start term: __init(arg1, arg2, arg3)

----------------------------------------

(1) IRSFormatTransformerProof (EQUIVALENT)
Reformatted IRS to match normalized format (transformed away non-linear left-hand sides, !=, / and %).
----------------------------------------

(2)
Obligation:
Rules:
f1_0_main_Load(arg1, arg2, arg3) -> f148_0_main_LE(arg1P, arg2P, arg3P) :|: arg1P + arg2P = arg3P && 0 <= arg1 - 1 && -1 <= arg2P - 1 && -1 <= arg2 - 1 && -1 <= arg1P - 1
f148_0_main_LE(x, x1, x2) -> f148_0_main_LE(x3, x4, x5) :|: x - 1 + x1 = x5 && x1 = x4 && x - 1 = x3 && -1 <= x1 - 1 && 0 <= x2 - 1 && 0 <= x - 1
f148_0_main_LE(x6, x7, x8) -> f148_0_main_LE(x9, x10, x11) :|: 0 = x11 && 0 = x10 && 0 = x9 && 0 = x7 && 0 = x6 && 0 <= x8 - 1
f148_0_main_LE(x12, x13, x14) -> f148_0_main_LE(x15, x16, x17) :|: x13 - 1 = x17 && x13 - 1 = x16 && 0 = x15 && 0 = x12 && 0 <= x13 - 1 && 0 <= x14 - 1
__init(x18, x19, x20) -> f1_0_main_Load(x21, x22, x23) :|: 0 <= 0
Start term: __init(arg1, arg2, arg3)

----------------------------------------

(3) IRSwTTerminationDigraphProof (EQUIVALENT)
Constructed termination digraph!
Nodes:
(1) f1_0_main_Load(arg1, arg2, arg3) -> f148_0_main_LE(arg1P, arg2P, arg3P) :|: arg1P + arg2P = arg3P && 0 <= arg1 - 1 && -1 <= arg2P - 1 && -1 <= arg2 - 1 && -1 <= arg1P - 1
(2) f148_0_main_LE(x, x1, x2) -> f148_0_main_LE(x3, x4, x5) :|: x - 1 + x1 = x5 && x1 = x4 && x - 1 = x3 && -1 <= x1 - 1 && 0 <= x2 - 1 && 0 <= x - 1
(3) f148_0_main_LE(x6, x7, x8) -> f148_0_main_LE(x9, x10, x11) :|: 0 = x11 && 0 = x10 && 0 = x9 && 0 = x7 && 0 = x6 && 0 <= x8 - 1
(4) f148_0_main_LE(x12, x13, x14) -> f148_0_main_LE(x15, x16, x17) :|: x13 - 1 = x17 && x13 - 1 = x16 && 0 = x15 && 0 = x12 && 0 <= x13 - 1 && 0 <= x14 - 1
(5) __init(x18, x19, x20) -> f1_0_main_Load(x21, x22, x23) :|: 0 <= 0

Arcs:
(1) -> (2), (4)
(2) -> (2), (4)
(4) -> (4)
(5) -> (1)

This digraph is fully evaluated!
----------------------------------------

(4)
Complex Obligation (AND)

----------------------------------------

(5)
Obligation:

Termination digraph:
Nodes:
(1) f148_0_main_LE(x, x1, x2) -> f148_0_main_LE(x3, x4, x5) :|: x - 1 + x1 = x5 && x1 = x4 && x - 1 = x3 && -1 <= x1 - 1 && 0 <= x2 - 1 && 0 <= x - 1

Arcs:
(1) -> (1)

This digraph is fully evaluated!

----------------------------------------

(6) IntTRSCompressionProof (EQUIVALENT)
Compressed rules.
----------------------------------------

(7)
Obligation:
Rules:
f148_0_main_LE(x:0, x1:0, x2:0) -> f148_0_main_LE(x:0 - 1, x1:0, x:0 - 1 + x1:0) :|: x2:0 > 0 && x1:0 > -1 && x:0 > 0

----------------------------------------

(8) TempFilterProof (SOUND)
Used the following sort dictionary for filtering: 
f148_0_main_LE(INTEGER, INTEGER, INTEGER)
Replaced non-predefined constructor symbols by 0.
----------------------------------------

(9)
Obligation:
Rules:
f148_0_main_LE(x:0, x1:0, x2:0) -> f148_0_main_LE(c, x1:0, c1) :|: c1 = x:0 - 1 + x1:0 && c = x:0 - 1 && (x2:0 > 0 && x1:0 > -1 && x:0 > 0)

----------------------------------------

(10) PolynomialOrderProcessor (EQUIVALENT)
Found the following polynomial interpretation:
[f148_0_main_LE(x, x1, x2)] = x

The following rules are decreasing:
f148_0_main_LE(x:0, x1:0, x2:0) -> f148_0_main_LE(c, x1:0, c1) :|: c1 = x:0 - 1 + x1:0 && c = x:0 - 1 && (x2:0 > 0 && x1:0 > -1 && x:0 > 0)
The following rules are bounded:
f148_0_main_LE(x:0, x1:0, x2:0) -> f148_0_main_LE(c, x1:0, c1) :|: c1 = x:0 - 1 + x1:0 && c = x:0 - 1 && (x2:0 > 0 && x1:0 > -1 && x:0 > 0)

----------------------------------------

(11)
YES

----------------------------------------

(12)
Obligation:

Termination digraph:
Nodes:
(1) f148_0_main_LE(x12, x13, x14) -> f148_0_main_LE(x15, x16, x17) :|: x13 - 1 = x17 && x13 - 1 = x16 && 0 = x15 && 0 = x12 && 0 <= x13 - 1 && 0 <= x14 - 1

Arcs:
(1) -> (1)

This digraph is fully evaluated!

----------------------------------------

(13) IntTRSCompressionProof (EQUIVALENT)
Compressed rules.
----------------------------------------

(14)
Obligation:
Rules:
f148_0_main_LE(cons_0, x13:0, x14:0) -> f148_0_main_LE(0, x13:0 - 1, x13:0 - 1) :|: x14:0 > 0 && x13:0 > 0 && cons_0 = 0

----------------------------------------

(15) TempFilterProof (SOUND)
Used the following sort dictionary for filtering: 
f148_0_main_LE(VARIABLE, INTEGER, INTEGER)
Replaced non-predefined constructor symbols by 0.
----------------------------------------

(16)
Obligation:
Rules:
f148_0_main_LE(c, x13:0, x14:0) -> f148_0_main_LE(c1, c2, c3) :|: c3 = x13:0 - 1 && (c2 = x13:0 - 1 && (c1 = 0 && c = 0)) && (x14:0 > 0 && x13:0 > 0 && cons_0 = 0)

----------------------------------------

(17) PolynomialOrderProcessor (EQUIVALENT)
Found the following polynomial interpretation:
[f148_0_main_LE(x, x1, x2)] = c*x + x1

The following rules are decreasing:
f148_0_main_LE(c, x13:0, x14:0) -> f148_0_main_LE(c1, c2, c3) :|: c3 = x13:0 - 1 && (c2 = x13:0 - 1 && (c1 = 0 && c = 0)) && (x14:0 > 0 && x13:0 > 0 && cons_0 = 0)
The following rules are bounded:
f148_0_main_LE(c, x13:0, x14:0) -> f148_0_main_LE(c1, c2, c3) :|: c3 = x13:0 - 1 && (c2 = x13:0 - 1 && (c1 = 0 && c = 0)) && (x14:0 > 0 && x13:0 > 0 && cons_0 = 0)

----------------------------------------

(18)
YES