YES proof of prog.inttrs # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty Termination of the given IRSwT could be proven: (0) IRSwT (1) IRSFormatTransformerProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (2) IRSwT (3) IRSwTTerminationDigraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 138 ms] (4) IRSwT (5) IntTRSCompressionProof [EQUIVALENT, 25 ms] (6) IRSwT (7) FilterProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (8) IntTRS (9) TerminationGraphProcessor [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (10) YES ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: Rules: l0(xHAT0, yHAT0) -> l1(xHATpost, yHATpost) :|: yHAT0 = yHATpost && xHATpost = yHAT0 && 0 <= xHAT0 && xHAT0 <= 0 && 1 <= yHAT0 l1(x, x1) -> l0(x2, x3) :|: x1 = x3 && x = x2 l0(x4, x5) -> l2(x6, x7) :|: x5 = x7 && x6 = x5 && 0 <= x4 && x4 <= 0 && 1 + x5 <= 0 l2(x8, x9) -> l0(x10, x11) :|: x9 = x11 && x8 = x10 l3(x12, x13) -> l0(x14, x15) :|: x13 = x15 && x12 = x14 Start term: l3(xHAT0, yHAT0) ---------------------------------------- (1) IRSFormatTransformerProof (EQUIVALENT) Reformatted IRS to match normalized format (transformed away non-linear left-hand sides, !=, / and %). ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: Rules: l0(xHAT0, yHAT0) -> l1(xHATpost, yHATpost) :|: yHAT0 = yHATpost && xHATpost = yHAT0 && 0 <= xHAT0 && xHAT0 <= 0 && 1 <= yHAT0 l1(x, x1) -> l0(x2, x3) :|: x1 = x3 && x = x2 l0(x4, x5) -> l2(x6, x7) :|: x5 = x7 && x6 = x5 && 0 <= x4 && x4 <= 0 && 1 + x5 <= 0 l2(x8, x9) -> l0(x10, x11) :|: x9 = x11 && x8 = x10 l3(x12, x13) -> l0(x14, x15) :|: x13 = x15 && x12 = x14 Start term: l3(xHAT0, yHAT0) ---------------------------------------- (3) IRSwTTerminationDigraphProof (EQUIVALENT) Constructed termination digraph! Nodes: (1) l0(xHAT0, yHAT0) -> l1(xHATpost, yHATpost) :|: yHAT0 = yHATpost && xHATpost = yHAT0 && 0 <= xHAT0 && xHAT0 <= 0 && 1 <= yHAT0 (2) l1(x, x1) -> l0(x2, x3) :|: x1 = x3 && x = x2 (3) l0(x4, x5) -> l2(x6, x7) :|: x5 = x7 && x6 = x5 && 0 <= x4 && x4 <= 0 && 1 + x5 <= 0 (4) l2(x8, x9) -> l0(x10, x11) :|: x9 = x11 && x8 = x10 (5) l3(x12, x13) -> l0(x14, x15) :|: x13 = x15 && x12 = x14 Arcs: (1) -> (2) (2) -> (1), (3) (3) -> (4) (4) -> (1), (3) (5) -> (1), (3) This digraph is fully evaluated! ---------------------------------------- (4) Obligation: Termination digraph: Nodes: (1) l0(xHAT0, yHAT0) -> l1(xHATpost, yHATpost) :|: yHAT0 = yHATpost && xHATpost = yHAT0 && 0 <= xHAT0 && xHAT0 <= 0 && 1 <= yHAT0 (2) l2(x8, x9) -> l0(x10, x11) :|: x9 = x11 && x8 = x10 (3) l0(x4, x5) -> l2(x6, x7) :|: x5 = x7 && x6 = x5 && 0 <= x4 && x4 <= 0 && 1 + x5 <= 0 (4) l1(x, x1) -> l0(x2, x3) :|: x1 = x3 && x = x2 Arcs: (1) -> (4) (2) -> (1), (3) (3) -> (2) (4) -> (1), (3) This digraph is fully evaluated! ---------------------------------------- (5) IntTRSCompressionProof (EQUIVALENT) Compressed rules. ---------------------------------------- (6) Obligation: Rules: l0(x4:0, x10:0) -> l0(x10:0, x10:0) :|: x4:0 < 1 && x4:0 > -1 && x10:0 < 0 l0(xHAT0:0, x2:0) -> l0(x2:0, x2:0) :|: xHAT0:0 < 1 && xHAT0:0 > -1 && x2:0 > 0 ---------------------------------------- (7) FilterProof (EQUIVALENT) Used the following sort dictionary for filtering: l0(INTEGER, INTEGER) Replaced non-predefined constructor symbols by 0. ---------------------------------------- (8) Obligation: Rules: l0(x4:0, x10:0) -> l0(x10:0, x10:0) :|: x4:0 < 1 && x4:0 > -1 && x10:0 < 0 l0(xHAT0:0, x2:0) -> l0(x2:0, x2:0) :|: xHAT0:0 < 1 && xHAT0:0 > -1 && x2:0 > 0 ---------------------------------------- (9) TerminationGraphProcessor (EQUIVALENT) Constructed the termination graph and obtained no non-trivial SCC(s). ---------------------------------------- (10) YES