YES proof of prog.inttrs # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty Termination of the given IRSwT could be proven: (0) IRSwT (1) IRSFormatTransformerProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (2) IRSwT (3) IRSwTTerminationDigraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 292 ms] (4) IRSwT (5) IntTRSCompressionProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (6) IRSwT (7) IntTRSUnneededArgumentFilterProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (8) IRSwT (9) TempFilterProof [SOUND, 63 ms] (10) IntTRS (11) PolynomialOrderProcessor [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (12) IntTRS (13) RankingReductionPairProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (14) YES ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: Rules: l0(Result_4HAT0, __const_21HAT0, __const_31HAT0, x_5HAT0, y_6HAT0) -> l1(Result_4HATpost, __const_21HATpost, __const_31HATpost, x_5HATpost, y_6HATpost) :|: y_6HAT0 = y_6HATpost && x_5HAT0 = x_5HATpost && __const_31HAT0 = __const_31HATpost && __const_21HAT0 = __const_21HATpost && Result_4HATpost = Result_4HATpost && 1 - __const_21HAT0 + x_5HAT0 <= 0 l0(x, x1, x2, x3, x4) -> l2(x5, x6, x7, x8, x9) :|: x4 = x9 && x3 = x8 && x2 = x7 && x1 = x6 && x = x5 && 0 <= -1 * x1 + x3 l3(x10, x11, x12, x13, x14) -> l0(x15, x16, x17, x18, x19) :|: x14 = x19 && x13 = x18 && x12 = x17 && x11 = x16 && x10 = x15 l2(x20, x21, x22, x23, x24) -> l0(x25, x26, x27, x28, x29) :|: x24 = x29 && x22 = x27 && x21 = x26 && x20 = x25 && x28 = -1 + x23 && 1 - x22 + x24 <= 0 l2(x30, x31, x32, x33, x34) -> l4(x35, x36, x37, x38, x39) :|: x33 = x38 && x32 = x37 && x31 = x36 && x30 = x35 && x39 = -1 + x34 && 0 <= -1 * x32 + x34 l4(x40, x41, x42, x43, x44) -> l2(x45, x46, x47, x48, x49) :|: x44 = x49 && x43 = x48 && x42 = x47 && x41 = x46 && x40 = x45 l5(x50, x51, x52, x53, x54) -> l3(x55, x56, x57, x58, x59) :|: x54 = x59 && x53 = x58 && x52 = x57 && x51 = x56 && x50 = x55 Start term: l5(Result_4HAT0, __const_21HAT0, __const_31HAT0, x_5HAT0, y_6HAT0) ---------------------------------------- (1) IRSFormatTransformerProof (EQUIVALENT) Reformatted IRS to match normalized format (transformed away non-linear left-hand sides, !=, / and %). ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: Rules: l0(Result_4HAT0, __const_21HAT0, __const_31HAT0, x_5HAT0, y_6HAT0) -> l1(Result_4HATpost, __const_21HATpost, __const_31HATpost, x_5HATpost, y_6HATpost) :|: y_6HAT0 = y_6HATpost && x_5HAT0 = x_5HATpost && __const_31HAT0 = __const_31HATpost && __const_21HAT0 = __const_21HATpost && Result_4HATpost = Result_4HATpost && 1 - __const_21HAT0 + x_5HAT0 <= 0 l0(x, x1, x2, x3, x4) -> l2(x5, x6, x7, x8, x9) :|: x4 = x9 && x3 = x8 && x2 = x7 && x1 = x6 && x = x5 && 0 <= -1 * x1 + x3 l3(x10, x11, x12, x13, x14) -> l0(x15, x16, x17, x18, x19) :|: x14 = x19 && x13 = x18 && x12 = x17 && x11 = x16 && x10 = x15 l2(x20, x21, x22, x23, x24) -> l0(x25, x26, x27, x28, x29) :|: x24 = x29 && x22 = x27 && x21 = x26 && x20 = x25 && x28 = -1 + x23 && 1 - x22 + x24 <= 0 l2(x30, x31, x32, x33, x34) -> l4(x35, x36, x37, x38, x39) :|: x33 = x38 && x32 = x37 && x31 = x36 && x30 = x35 && x39 = -1 + x34 && 0 <= -1 * x32 + x34 l4(x40, x41, x42, x43, x44) -> l2(x45, x46, x47, x48, x49) :|: x44 = x49 && x43 = x48 && x42 = x47 && x41 = x46 && x40 = x45 l5(x50, x51, x52, x53, x54) -> l3(x55, x56, x57, x58, x59) :|: x54 = x59 && x53 = x58 && x52 = x57 && x51 = x56 && x50 = x55 Start term: l5(Result_4HAT0, __const_21HAT0, __const_31HAT0, x_5HAT0, y_6HAT0) ---------------------------------------- (3) IRSwTTerminationDigraphProof (EQUIVALENT) Constructed termination digraph! Nodes: (1) l0(Result_4HAT0, __const_21HAT0, __const_31HAT0, x_5HAT0, y_6HAT0) -> l1(Result_4HATpost, __const_21HATpost, __const_31HATpost, x_5HATpost, y_6HATpost) :|: y_6HAT0 = y_6HATpost && x_5HAT0 = x_5HATpost && __const_31HAT0 = __const_31HATpost && __const_21HAT0 = __const_21HATpost && Result_4HATpost = Result_4HATpost && 1 - __const_21HAT0 + x_5HAT0 <= 0 (2) l0(x, x1, x2, x3, x4) -> l2(x5, x6, x7, x8, x9) :|: x4 = x9 && x3 = x8 && x2 = x7 && x1 = x6 && x = x5 && 0 <= -1 * x1 + x3 (3) l3(x10, x11, x12, x13, x14) -> l0(x15, x16, x17, x18, x19) :|: x14 = x19 && x13 = x18 && x12 = x17 && x11 = x16 && x10 = x15 (4) l2(x20, x21, x22, x23, x24) -> l0(x25, x26, x27, x28, x29) :|: x24 = x29 && x22 = x27 && x21 = x26 && x20 = x25 && x28 = -1 + x23 && 1 - x22 + x24 <= 0 (5) l2(x30, x31, x32, x33, x34) -> l4(x35, x36, x37, x38, x39) :|: x33 = x38 && x32 = x37 && x31 = x36 && x30 = x35 && x39 = -1 + x34 && 0 <= -1 * x32 + x34 (6) l4(x40, x41, x42, x43, x44) -> l2(x45, x46, x47, x48, x49) :|: x44 = x49 && x43 = x48 && x42 = x47 && x41 = x46 && x40 = x45 (7) l5(x50, x51, x52, x53, x54) -> l3(x55, x56, x57, x58, x59) :|: x54 = x59 && x53 = x58 && x52 = x57 && x51 = x56 && x50 = x55 Arcs: (2) -> (4), (5) (3) -> (1), (2) (4) -> (1), (2) (5) -> (6) (6) -> (4), (5) (7) -> (3) This digraph is fully evaluated! ---------------------------------------- (4) Obligation: Termination digraph: Nodes: (1) l0(x, x1, x2, x3, x4) -> l2(x5, x6, x7, x8, x9) :|: x4 = x9 && x3 = x8 && x2 = x7 && x1 = x6 && x = x5 && 0 <= -1 * x1 + x3 (2) l2(x20, x21, x22, x23, x24) -> l0(x25, x26, x27, x28, x29) :|: x24 = x29 && x22 = x27 && x21 = x26 && x20 = x25 && x28 = -1 + x23 && 1 - x22 + x24 <= 0 (3) l4(x40, x41, x42, x43, x44) -> l2(x45, x46, x47, x48, x49) :|: x44 = x49 && x43 = x48 && x42 = x47 && x41 = x46 && x40 = x45 (4) l2(x30, x31, x32, x33, x34) -> l4(x35, x36, x37, x38, x39) :|: x33 = x38 && x32 = x37 && x31 = x36 && x30 = x35 && x39 = -1 + x34 && 0 <= -1 * x32 + x34 Arcs: (1) -> (2), (4) (2) -> (1) (3) -> (2), (4) (4) -> (3) This digraph is fully evaluated! ---------------------------------------- (5) IntTRSCompressionProof (EQUIVALENT) Compressed rules. ---------------------------------------- (6) Obligation: Rules: l2(x30:0, x31:0, x32:0, x33:0, x34:0) -> l2(x30:0, x31:0, x32:0, x33:0, -1 + x34:0) :|: 0 <= -1 * x32:0 + x34:0 l2(x20:0, x21:0, x22:0, x23:0, x24:0) -> l2(x20:0, x21:0, x22:0, -1 + x23:0, x24:0) :|: 1 - x22:0 + x24:0 <= 0 && 0 <= -1 * x21:0 + (-1 + x23:0) ---------------------------------------- (7) IntTRSUnneededArgumentFilterProof (EQUIVALENT) Some arguments are removed because they cannot influence termination. We removed arguments according to the following replacements: l2(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5) -> l2(x2, x3, x4, x5) ---------------------------------------- (8) Obligation: Rules: l2(x31:0, x32:0, x33:0, x34:0) -> l2(x31:0, x32:0, x33:0, -1 + x34:0) :|: 0 <= -1 * x32:0 + x34:0 l2(x21:0, x22:0, x23:0, x24:0) -> l2(x21:0, x22:0, -1 + x23:0, x24:0) :|: 1 - x22:0 + x24:0 <= 0 && 0 <= -1 * x21:0 + (-1 + x23:0) ---------------------------------------- (9) TempFilterProof (SOUND) Used the following sort dictionary for filtering: l2(VARIABLE, INTEGER, VARIABLE, INTEGER) Replaced non-predefined constructor symbols by 0. ---------------------------------------- (10) Obligation: Rules: l2(x31:0, x32:0, x33:0, x34:0) -> l2(x31:0, x32:0, x33:0, c) :|: c = -1 + x34:0 && 0 <= -1 * x32:0 + x34:0 l2(x21:0, x22:0, x23:0, x24:0) -> l2(x21:0, x22:0, c1, x24:0) :|: c1 = -1 + x23:0 && (1 - x22:0 + x24:0 <= 0 && 0 <= -1 * x21:0 + (-1 + x23:0)) ---------------------------------------- (11) PolynomialOrderProcessor (EQUIVALENT) Found the following polynomial interpretation: [l2(x, x1, x2, x3)] = -1 - x + x2 The following rules are decreasing: l2(x21:0, x22:0, x23:0, x24:0) -> l2(x21:0, x22:0, c1, x24:0) :|: c1 = -1 + x23:0 && (1 - x22:0 + x24:0 <= 0 && 0 <= -1 * x21:0 + (-1 + x23:0)) The following rules are bounded: l2(x21:0, x22:0, x23:0, x24:0) -> l2(x21:0, x22:0, c1, x24:0) :|: c1 = -1 + x23:0 && (1 - x22:0 + x24:0 <= 0 && 0 <= -1 * x21:0 + (-1 + x23:0)) ---------------------------------------- (12) Obligation: Rules: l2(x31:0, x32:0, x33:0, x34:0) -> l2(x31:0, x32:0, x33:0, c) :|: c = -1 + x34:0 && 0 <= -1 * x32:0 + x34:0 ---------------------------------------- (13) RankingReductionPairProof (EQUIVALENT) Interpretation: [ l2 ] = -1*l2_2 + l2_4 The following rules are decreasing: l2(x31:0, x32:0, x33:0, x34:0) -> l2(x31:0, x32:0, x33:0, c) :|: c = -1 + x34:0 && 0 <= -1 * x32:0 + x34:0 The following rules are bounded: l2(x31:0, x32:0, x33:0, x34:0) -> l2(x31:0, x32:0, x33:0, c) :|: c = -1 + x34:0 && 0 <= -1 * x32:0 + x34:0 ---------------------------------------- (14) YES