YES
proof of prog.inttrs
# AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty


Termination of the given IRSwT could be proven:

(0) IRSwT
(1) IRSFormatTransformerProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms]
(2) IRSwT
(3) IRSwTTerminationDigraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 132 ms]
(4) IRSwT
(5) IntTRSCompressionProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms]
(6) IRSwT
(7) TempFilterProof [SOUND, 45 ms]
(8) IntTRS
(9) PolynomialOrderProcessor [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms]
(10) IntTRS
(11) PolynomialOrderProcessor [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms]
(12) YES


----------------------------------------

(0)
Obligation:
Rules:
l0(xHAT0, yHAT0) -> l1(xHATpost, yHATpost) :|: xHAT0 = xHATpost && yHATpost = -1 + yHAT0 && 1 <= yHAT0
l1(x, x1) -> l0(x2, x3) :|: x1 = x3 && x = x2
l0(x4, x5) -> l2(x6, x7) :|: x5 = x7 && x4 = x6 && x5 <= 0
l2(x8, x9) -> l0(x10, x11) :|: x11 = x11 && x10 = -1 + x8 && 1 <= x8
l3(x12, x13) -> l2(x14, x15) :|: x13 = x15 && x12 = x14
l4(x16, x17) -> l3(x18, x19) :|: x17 = x19 && x16 = x18
Start term: l4(xHAT0, yHAT0)

----------------------------------------

(1) IRSFormatTransformerProof (EQUIVALENT)
Reformatted IRS to match normalized format (transformed away non-linear left-hand sides, !=, / and %).
----------------------------------------

(2)
Obligation:
Rules:
l0(xHAT0, yHAT0) -> l1(xHATpost, yHATpost) :|: xHAT0 = xHATpost && yHATpost = -1 + yHAT0 && 1 <= yHAT0
l1(x, x1) -> l0(x2, x3) :|: x1 = x3 && x = x2
l0(x4, x5) -> l2(x6, x7) :|: x5 = x7 && x4 = x6 && x5 <= 0
l2(x8, x9) -> l0(x10, x11) :|: x11 = x11 && x10 = -1 + x8 && 1 <= x8
l3(x12, x13) -> l2(x14, x15) :|: x13 = x15 && x12 = x14
l4(x16, x17) -> l3(x18, x19) :|: x17 = x19 && x16 = x18
Start term: l4(xHAT0, yHAT0)

----------------------------------------

(3) IRSwTTerminationDigraphProof (EQUIVALENT)
Constructed termination digraph!
Nodes:
(1) l0(xHAT0, yHAT0) -> l1(xHATpost, yHATpost) :|: xHAT0 = xHATpost && yHATpost = -1 + yHAT0 && 1 <= yHAT0
(2) l1(x, x1) -> l0(x2, x3) :|: x1 = x3 && x = x2
(3) l0(x4, x5) -> l2(x6, x7) :|: x5 = x7 && x4 = x6 && x5 <= 0
(4) l2(x8, x9) -> l0(x10, x11) :|: x11 = x11 && x10 = -1 + x8 && 1 <= x8
(5) l3(x12, x13) -> l2(x14, x15) :|: x13 = x15 && x12 = x14
(6) l4(x16, x17) -> l3(x18, x19) :|: x17 = x19 && x16 = x18

Arcs:
(1) -> (2)
(2) -> (1), (3)
(3) -> (4)
(4) -> (1), (3)
(5) -> (4)
(6) -> (5)

This digraph is fully evaluated!
----------------------------------------

(4)
Obligation:

Termination digraph:
Nodes:
(1) l0(xHAT0, yHAT0) -> l1(xHATpost, yHATpost) :|: xHAT0 = xHATpost && yHATpost = -1 + yHAT0 && 1 <= yHAT0
(2) l2(x8, x9) -> l0(x10, x11) :|: x11 = x11 && x10 = -1 + x8 && 1 <= x8
(3) l0(x4, x5) -> l2(x6, x7) :|: x5 = x7 && x4 = x6 && x5 <= 0
(4) l1(x, x1) -> l0(x2, x3) :|: x1 = x3 && x = x2

Arcs:
(1) -> (4)
(2) -> (1), (3)
(3) -> (2)
(4) -> (1), (3)

This digraph is fully evaluated!

----------------------------------------

(5) IntTRSCompressionProof (EQUIVALENT)
Compressed rules.
----------------------------------------

(6)
Obligation:
Rules:
l0(x4:0, x5:0) -> l0(-1 + x4:0, x11:0) :|: x5:0 < 1 && x4:0 > 0
l0(x2:0, yHAT0:0) -> l0(x2:0, -1 + yHAT0:0) :|: yHAT0:0 > 0

----------------------------------------

(7) TempFilterProof (SOUND)
Used the following sort dictionary for filtering: 
l0(VARIABLE, VARIABLE)
Replaced non-predefined constructor symbols by 0.
----------------------------------------

(8)
Obligation:
Rules:
l0(x4:0, x5:0) -> l0(c, x11:0) :|: c = -1 + x4:0 && (x5:0 < 1 && x4:0 > 0)
l0(x2:0, yHAT0:0) -> l0(x2:0, c1) :|: c1 = -1 + yHAT0:0 && yHAT0:0 > 0

----------------------------------------

(9) PolynomialOrderProcessor (EQUIVALENT)
Found the following polynomial interpretation:
[l0(x, x1)] = -1 + x

The following rules are decreasing:
l0(x4:0, x5:0) -> l0(c, x11:0) :|: c = -1 + x4:0 && (x5:0 < 1 && x4:0 > 0)
The following rules are bounded:
l0(x4:0, x5:0) -> l0(c, x11:0) :|: c = -1 + x4:0 && (x5:0 < 1 && x4:0 > 0)

----------------------------------------

(10)
Obligation:
Rules:
l0(x2:0, yHAT0:0) -> l0(x2:0, c1) :|: c1 = -1 + yHAT0:0 && yHAT0:0 > 0

----------------------------------------

(11) PolynomialOrderProcessor (EQUIVALENT)
Found the following polynomial interpretation:
[l0(x, x1)] = x1

The following rules are decreasing:
l0(x2:0, yHAT0:0) -> l0(x2:0, c1) :|: c1 = -1 + yHAT0:0 && yHAT0:0 > 0
The following rules are bounded:
l0(x2:0, yHAT0:0) -> l0(x2:0, c1) :|: c1 = -1 + yHAT0:0 && yHAT0:0 > 0

----------------------------------------

(12)
YES