YES
proof of prog.inttrs
# AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty


Termination of the given IRSwT could be proven:

(0) IRSwT
(1) IRSFormatTransformerProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms]
(2) IRSwT
(3) IRSwTTerminationDigraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 79 ms]
(4) IRSwT
(5) IntTRSCompressionProof [EQUIVALENT, 14 ms]
(6) IRSwT
(7) IntTRSUnneededArgumentFilterProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms]
(8) IRSwT
(9) TempFilterProof [SOUND, 14 ms]
(10) IntTRS
(11) PolynomialOrderProcessor [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms]
(12) YES


----------------------------------------

(0)
Obligation:
Rules:
l0(iHAT0, tmpHAT0) -> l1(iHATpost, tmpHATpost) :|: tmpHAT0 = tmpHATpost && iHAT0 = iHATpost && 50 <= iHAT0
l0(x, x1) -> l2(x2, x3) :|: x1 = x3 && x2 = 1 + x && 1 + x <= 50
l2(x4, x5) -> l0(x6, x7) :|: x5 = x7 && x4 = x6
l3(x8, x9) -> l2(x10, x11) :|: x12 = 0 && x11 = x11 && x10 = 0
l4(x13, x14) -> l3(x15, x16) :|: x14 = x16 && x13 = x15
Start term: l4(iHAT0, tmpHAT0)

----------------------------------------

(1) IRSFormatTransformerProof (EQUIVALENT)
Reformatted IRS to match normalized format (transformed away non-linear left-hand sides, !=, / and %).
----------------------------------------

(2)
Obligation:
Rules:
l0(iHAT0, tmpHAT0) -> l1(iHATpost, tmpHATpost) :|: tmpHAT0 = tmpHATpost && iHAT0 = iHATpost && 50 <= iHAT0
l0(x, x1) -> l2(x2, x3) :|: x1 = x3 && x2 = 1 + x && 1 + x <= 50
l2(x4, x5) -> l0(x6, x7) :|: x5 = x7 && x4 = x6
l3(x8, x9) -> l2(x10, x11) :|: x12 = 0 && x11 = x11 && x10 = 0
l4(x13, x14) -> l3(x15, x16) :|: x14 = x16 && x13 = x15
Start term: l4(iHAT0, tmpHAT0)

----------------------------------------

(3) IRSwTTerminationDigraphProof (EQUIVALENT)
Constructed termination digraph!
Nodes:
(1) l0(iHAT0, tmpHAT0) -> l1(iHATpost, tmpHATpost) :|: tmpHAT0 = tmpHATpost && iHAT0 = iHATpost && 50 <= iHAT0
(2) l0(x, x1) -> l2(x2, x3) :|: x1 = x3 && x2 = 1 + x && 1 + x <= 50
(3) l2(x4, x5) -> l0(x6, x7) :|: x5 = x7 && x4 = x6
(4) l3(x8, x9) -> l2(x10, x11) :|: x12 = 0 && x11 = x11 && x10 = 0
(5) l4(x13, x14) -> l3(x15, x16) :|: x14 = x16 && x13 = x15

Arcs:
(2) -> (3)
(3) -> (1), (2)
(4) -> (3)
(5) -> (4)

This digraph is fully evaluated!
----------------------------------------

(4)
Obligation:

Termination digraph:
Nodes:
(1) l0(x, x1) -> l2(x2, x3) :|: x1 = x3 && x2 = 1 + x && 1 + x <= 50
(2) l2(x4, x5) -> l0(x6, x7) :|: x5 = x7 && x4 = x6

Arcs:
(1) -> (2)
(2) -> (1)

This digraph is fully evaluated!

----------------------------------------

(5) IntTRSCompressionProof (EQUIVALENT)
Compressed rules.
----------------------------------------

(6)
Obligation:
Rules:
l0(x:0, x1:0) -> l0(1 + x:0, x1:0) :|: x:0 < 50

----------------------------------------

(7) IntTRSUnneededArgumentFilterProof (EQUIVALENT)
Some arguments are removed because they cannot influence termination. We removed arguments according to the following replacements:

   l0(x1, x2) -> l0(x1)

----------------------------------------

(8)
Obligation:
Rules:
l0(x:0) -> l0(1 + x:0) :|: x:0 < 50

----------------------------------------

(9) TempFilterProof (SOUND)
Used the following sort dictionary for filtering: 
l0(INTEGER)
Replaced non-predefined constructor symbols by 0.
----------------------------------------

(10)
Obligation:
Rules:
l0(x:0) -> l0(c) :|: c = 1 + x:0 && x:0 < 50

----------------------------------------

(11) PolynomialOrderProcessor (EQUIVALENT)
Found the following polynomial interpretation:
[l0(x)] = 49 - x

The following rules are decreasing:
l0(x:0) -> l0(c) :|: c = 1 + x:0 && x:0 < 50
The following rules are bounded:
l0(x:0) -> l0(c) :|: c = 1 + x:0 && x:0 < 50

----------------------------------------

(12)
YES