NO proof of prog.inttrs # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty Termination of the given IRSwT could be disproven: (0) IRSwT (1) IRSFormatTransformerProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (2) IRSwT (3) IRSwTTerminationDigraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 393 ms] (4) AND (5) IRSwT (6) IntTRSCompressionProof [EQUIVALENT, 2 ms] (7) IRSwT (8) IntTRSUnneededArgumentFilterProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (9) IRSwT (10) TempFilterProof [SOUND, 48 ms] (11) IntTRS (12) RankingReductionPairProof [EQUIVALENT, 26 ms] (13) YES (14) IRSwT (15) IntTRSCompressionProof [EQUIVALENT, 3 ms] (16) IRSwT (17) FilterProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (18) IntTRS (19) IntTRSNonPeriodicNontermProof [COMPLETE, 0 ms] (20) NO ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: Rules: l0(___rho_1_HAT0, cHAT0, curr_servHAT0, respHAT0, serversHAT0) -> l1(___rho_1_HATpost, cHATpost, curr_servHATpost, respHATpost, serversHATpost) :|: serversHAT0 = serversHATpost && respHAT0 = respHATpost && curr_servHAT0 = curr_servHATpost && cHAT0 = cHATpost && ___rho_1_HAT0 = ___rho_1_HATpost l2(x, x1, x2, x3, x4) -> l3(x5, x6, x7, x8, x9) :|: x4 = x9 && x3 = x8 && x2 = x7 && x1 = x6 && x = x5 l4(x10, x11, x12, x13, x14) -> l5(x15, x16, x17, x18, x19) :|: x14 = x19 && x13 = x18 && x12 = x17 && x11 = x16 && x10 = x15 l5(x20, x21, x22, x23, x24) -> l4(x25, x26, x27, x28, x29) :|: x24 = x29 && x23 = x28 && x22 = x27 && x21 = x26 && x20 = x25 l6(x30, x31, x32, x33, x34) -> l0(x35, x36, x37, x38, x39) :|: x34 = x39 && x33 = x38 && x31 = x36 && x30 = x35 && x37 = -1 + x32 && 1 + x31 <= x32 && x30 <= 0 l6(x40, x41, x42, x43, x44) -> l0(x45, x46, x47, x48, x49) :|: x44 = x49 && x40 = x45 && x48 = 1 + x43 && x47 = -1 + x42 && x46 = -1 + x41 && 1 <= x40 l1(x50, x51, x52, x53, x54) -> l6(x55, x56, x57, x58, x59) :|: x54 = x59 && x53 = x58 && x52 = x57 && x51 = x56 && x55 = x55 && 1 <= x52 l1(x60, x61, x62, x63, x64) -> l4(x65, x66, x67, x68, x69) :|: x64 = x69 && x63 = x68 && x62 = x67 && x61 = x66 && x60 = x65 && x62 <= 0 l7(x70, x71, x72, x73, x74) -> l0(x75, x76, x77, x78, x79) :|: x70 = x75 && x77 = x79 && x78 = 0 && x79 = 8 && 1 <= x76 && x76 = x76 l8(x80, x81, x82, x83, x84) -> l7(x85, x86, x87, x88, x89) :|: x84 = x89 && x83 = x88 && x82 = x87 && x81 = x86 && x80 = x85 Start term: l8(___rho_1_HAT0, cHAT0, curr_servHAT0, respHAT0, serversHAT0) ---------------------------------------- (1) IRSFormatTransformerProof (EQUIVALENT) Reformatted IRS to match normalized format (transformed away non-linear left-hand sides, !=, / and %). ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: Rules: l0(___rho_1_HAT0, cHAT0, curr_servHAT0, respHAT0, serversHAT0) -> l1(___rho_1_HATpost, cHATpost, curr_servHATpost, respHATpost, serversHATpost) :|: serversHAT0 = serversHATpost && respHAT0 = respHATpost && curr_servHAT0 = curr_servHATpost && cHAT0 = cHATpost && ___rho_1_HAT0 = ___rho_1_HATpost l2(x, x1, x2, x3, x4) -> l3(x5, x6, x7, x8, x9) :|: x4 = x9 && x3 = x8 && x2 = x7 && x1 = x6 && x = x5 l4(x10, x11, x12, x13, x14) -> l5(x15, x16, x17, x18, x19) :|: x14 = x19 && x13 = x18 && x12 = x17 && x11 = x16 && x10 = x15 l5(x20, x21, x22, x23, x24) -> l4(x25, x26, x27, x28, x29) :|: x24 = x29 && x23 = x28 && x22 = x27 && x21 = x26 && x20 = x25 l6(x30, x31, x32, x33, x34) -> l0(x35, x36, x37, x38, x39) :|: x34 = x39 && x33 = x38 && x31 = x36 && x30 = x35 && x37 = -1 + x32 && 1 + x31 <= x32 && x30 <= 0 l6(x40, x41, x42, x43, x44) -> l0(x45, x46, x47, x48, x49) :|: x44 = x49 && x40 = x45 && x48 = 1 + x43 && x47 = -1 + x42 && x46 = -1 + x41 && 1 <= x40 l1(x50, x51, x52, x53, x54) -> l6(x55, x56, x57, x58, x59) :|: x54 = x59 && x53 = x58 && x52 = x57 && x51 = x56 && x55 = x55 && 1 <= x52 l1(x60, x61, x62, x63, x64) -> l4(x65, x66, x67, x68, x69) :|: x64 = x69 && x63 = x68 && x62 = x67 && x61 = x66 && x60 = x65 && x62 <= 0 l7(x70, x71, x72, x73, x74) -> l0(x75, x76, x77, x78, x79) :|: x70 = x75 && x77 = x79 && x78 = 0 && x79 = 8 && 1 <= x76 && x76 = x76 l8(x80, x81, x82, x83, x84) -> l7(x85, x86, x87, x88, x89) :|: x84 = x89 && x83 = x88 && x82 = x87 && x81 = x86 && x80 = x85 Start term: l8(___rho_1_HAT0, cHAT0, curr_servHAT0, respHAT0, serversHAT0) ---------------------------------------- (3) IRSwTTerminationDigraphProof (EQUIVALENT) Constructed termination digraph! Nodes: (1) l0(___rho_1_HAT0, cHAT0, curr_servHAT0, respHAT0, serversHAT0) -> l1(___rho_1_HATpost, cHATpost, curr_servHATpost, respHATpost, serversHATpost) :|: serversHAT0 = serversHATpost && respHAT0 = respHATpost && curr_servHAT0 = curr_servHATpost && cHAT0 = cHATpost && ___rho_1_HAT0 = ___rho_1_HATpost (2) l2(x, x1, x2, x3, x4) -> l3(x5, x6, x7, x8, x9) :|: x4 = x9 && x3 = x8 && x2 = x7 && x1 = x6 && x = x5 (3) l4(x10, x11, x12, x13, x14) -> l5(x15, x16, x17, x18, x19) :|: x14 = x19 && x13 = x18 && x12 = x17 && x11 = x16 && x10 = x15 (4) l5(x20, x21, x22, x23, x24) -> l4(x25, x26, x27, x28, x29) :|: x24 = x29 && x23 = x28 && x22 = x27 && x21 = x26 && x20 = x25 (5) l6(x30, x31, x32, x33, x34) -> l0(x35, x36, x37, x38, x39) :|: x34 = x39 && x33 = x38 && x31 = x36 && x30 = x35 && x37 = -1 + x32 && 1 + x31 <= x32 && x30 <= 0 (6) l6(x40, x41, x42, x43, x44) -> l0(x45, x46, x47, x48, x49) :|: x44 = x49 && x40 = x45 && x48 = 1 + x43 && x47 = -1 + x42 && x46 = -1 + x41 && 1 <= x40 (7) l1(x50, x51, x52, x53, x54) -> l6(x55, x56, x57, x58, x59) :|: x54 = x59 && x53 = x58 && x52 = x57 && x51 = x56 && x55 = x55 && 1 <= x52 (8) l1(x60, x61, x62, x63, x64) -> l4(x65, x66, x67, x68, x69) :|: x64 = x69 && x63 = x68 && x62 = x67 && x61 = x66 && x60 = x65 && x62 <= 0 (9) l7(x70, x71, x72, x73, x74) -> l0(x75, x76, x77, x78, x79) :|: x70 = x75 && x77 = x79 && x78 = 0 && x79 = 8 && 1 <= x76 && x76 = x76 (10) l8(x80, x81, x82, x83, x84) -> l7(x85, x86, x87, x88, x89) :|: x84 = x89 && x83 = x88 && x82 = x87 && x81 = x86 && x80 = x85 Arcs: (1) -> (7), (8) (3) -> (4) (4) -> (3) (5) -> (1) (6) -> (1) (7) -> (5), (6) (8) -> (3) (9) -> (1) (10) -> (9) This digraph is fully evaluated! ---------------------------------------- (4) Complex Obligation (AND) ---------------------------------------- (5) Obligation: Termination digraph: Nodes: (1) l0(___rho_1_HAT0, cHAT0, curr_servHAT0, respHAT0, serversHAT0) -> l1(___rho_1_HATpost, cHATpost, curr_servHATpost, respHATpost, serversHATpost) :|: serversHAT0 = serversHATpost && respHAT0 = respHATpost && curr_servHAT0 = curr_servHATpost && cHAT0 = cHATpost && ___rho_1_HAT0 = ___rho_1_HATpost (2) l6(x40, x41, x42, x43, x44) -> l0(x45, x46, x47, x48, x49) :|: x44 = x49 && x40 = x45 && x48 = 1 + x43 && x47 = -1 + x42 && x46 = -1 + x41 && 1 <= x40 (3) l6(x30, x31, x32, x33, x34) -> l0(x35, x36, x37, x38, x39) :|: x34 = x39 && x33 = x38 && x31 = x36 && x30 = x35 && x37 = -1 + x32 && 1 + x31 <= x32 && x30 <= 0 (4) l1(x50, x51, x52, x53, x54) -> l6(x55, x56, x57, x58, x59) :|: x54 = x59 && x53 = x58 && x52 = x57 && x51 = x56 && x55 = x55 && 1 <= x52 Arcs: (1) -> (4) (2) -> (1) (3) -> (1) (4) -> (2), (3) This digraph is fully evaluated! ---------------------------------------- (6) IntTRSCompressionProof (EQUIVALENT) Compressed rules. ---------------------------------------- (7) Obligation: Rules: l6(___rho_1_HATpost:0, x41:0, x42:0, x43:0, serversHATpost:0) -> l6(x55:0, -1 + x41:0, -1 + x42:0, 1 + x43:0, serversHATpost:0) :|: ___rho_1_HATpost:0 > 0 && x42:0 > 1 l6(x, x1, x2, x3, x4) -> l6(x5, x1, -1 + x2, x3, x4) :|: x2 >= 1 + x1 && x2 > 1 && x < 1 ---------------------------------------- (8) IntTRSUnneededArgumentFilterProof (EQUIVALENT) Some arguments are removed because they cannot influence termination. We removed arguments according to the following replacements: l6(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5) -> l6(x1, x2, x3) ---------------------------------------- (9) Obligation: Rules: l6(___rho_1_HATpost:0, x41:0, x42:0) -> l6(x55:0, -1 + x41:0, -1 + x42:0) :|: ___rho_1_HATpost:0 > 0 && x42:0 > 1 l6(x, x1, x2) -> l6(x5, x1, -1 + x2) :|: x2 >= 1 + x1 && x2 > 1 && x < 1 ---------------------------------------- (10) TempFilterProof (SOUND) Used the following sort dictionary for filtering: l6(VARIABLE, VARIABLE, INTEGER) Replaced non-predefined constructor symbols by 0. ---------------------------------------- (11) Obligation: Rules: l6(___rho_1_HATpost:0, x41:0, x42:0) -> l6(x55:0, c, c1) :|: c1 = -1 + x42:0 && c = -1 + x41:0 && (___rho_1_HATpost:0 > 0 && x42:0 > 1) l6(x, x1, x2) -> l6(x5, x1, c2) :|: c2 = -1 + x2 && (x2 >= 1 + x1 && x2 > 1 && x < 1) ---------------------------------------- (12) RankingReductionPairProof (EQUIVALENT) Interpretation: [ l6 ] = l6_3 The following rules are decreasing: l6(___rho_1_HATpost:0, x41:0, x42:0) -> l6(x55:0, c, c1) :|: c1 = -1 + x42:0 && c = -1 + x41:0 && (___rho_1_HATpost:0 > 0 && x42:0 > 1) l6(x, x1, x2) -> l6(x5, x1, c2) :|: c2 = -1 + x2 && (x2 >= 1 + x1 && x2 > 1 && x < 1) The following rules are bounded: l6(___rho_1_HATpost:0, x41:0, x42:0) -> l6(x55:0, c, c1) :|: c1 = -1 + x42:0 && c = -1 + x41:0 && (___rho_1_HATpost:0 > 0 && x42:0 > 1) l6(x, x1, x2) -> l6(x5, x1, c2) :|: c2 = -1 + x2 && (x2 >= 1 + x1 && x2 > 1 && x < 1) ---------------------------------------- (13) YES ---------------------------------------- (14) Obligation: Termination digraph: Nodes: (1) l4(x10, x11, x12, x13, x14) -> l5(x15, x16, x17, x18, x19) :|: x14 = x19 && x13 = x18 && x12 = x17 && x11 = x16 && x10 = x15 (2) l5(x20, x21, x22, x23, x24) -> l4(x25, x26, x27, x28, x29) :|: x24 = x29 && x23 = x28 && x22 = x27 && x21 = x26 && x20 = x25 Arcs: (1) -> (2) (2) -> (1) This digraph is fully evaluated! ---------------------------------------- (15) IntTRSCompressionProof (EQUIVALENT) Compressed rules. ---------------------------------------- (16) Obligation: Rules: l4(x10:0, x11:0, x12:0, x13:0, x14:0) -> l4(x10:0, x11:0, x12:0, x13:0, x14:0) :|: TRUE ---------------------------------------- (17) FilterProof (EQUIVALENT) Used the following sort dictionary for filtering: l4(VARIABLE, VARIABLE, VARIABLE, VARIABLE, VARIABLE) Replaced non-predefined constructor symbols by 0. ---------------------------------------- (18) Obligation: Rules: l4(x10:0, x11:0, x12:0, x13:0, x14:0) -> l4(x10:0, x11:0, x12:0, x13:0, x14:0) :|: TRUE ---------------------------------------- (19) IntTRSNonPeriodicNontermProof (COMPLETE) Normalized system to the following form: f(pc, x10:0, x11:0, x12:0, x13:0, x14:0) -> f(1, x10:0, x11:0, x12:0, x13:0, x14:0) :|: pc = 1 && TRUE Proved unsatisfiability of the following formula, indicating that the system is never left after entering: (((run2_0 = ((1 * 1)) and run2_1 = ((run1_1 * 1)) and run2_2 = ((run1_2 * 1)) and run2_3 = ((run1_3 * 1)) and run2_4 = ((run1_4 * 1)) and run2_5 = ((run1_5 * 1))) and (((run1_0 * 1)) = ((1 * 1)) and T)) and !(((run2_0 * 1)) = ((1 * 1)) and T)) Proved satisfiability of the following formula, indicating that the system is entered at least once: ((run2_0 = ((1 * 1)) and run2_1 = ((run1_1 * 1)) and run2_2 = ((run1_2 * 1)) and run2_3 = ((run1_3 * 1)) and run2_4 = ((run1_4 * 1)) and run2_5 = ((run1_5 * 1))) and (((run1_0 * 1)) = ((1 * 1)) and T)) ---------------------------------------- (20) NO