MAYBE proof of prog.inttrs # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty Termination of the given IRSwT could not be shown: (0) IRSwT (1) IRSFormatTransformerProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (2) IRSwT (3) IRSwTTerminationDigraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 72 ms] (4) IRSwT (5) IntTRSCompressionProof [EQUIVALENT, 15 ms] (6) IRSwT (7) TempFilterProof [SOUND, 85 ms] (8) IRSwT (9) IRSwTTerminationDigraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (10) IRSwT ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: Rules: l0(xHAT0) -> l2(xHATpost) :|: xHATpost = -1 + xHAT0 l2(x) -> l1(x1) :|: x = x1 && 1 <= x l2(x2) -> l1(x3) :|: x2 = x3 && 1 + x2 <= 0 l1(x4) -> l0(x5) :|: x4 = x5 l3(x6) -> l0(x7) :|: x6 = x7 && 1 <= x6 l4(x8) -> l3(x9) :|: x8 = x9 Start term: l4(xHAT0) ---------------------------------------- (1) IRSFormatTransformerProof (EQUIVALENT) Reformatted IRS to match normalized format (transformed away non-linear left-hand sides, !=, / and %). ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: Rules: l0(xHAT0) -> l2(xHATpost) :|: xHATpost = -1 + xHAT0 l2(x) -> l1(x1) :|: x = x1 && 1 <= x l2(x2) -> l1(x3) :|: x2 = x3 && 1 + x2 <= 0 l1(x4) -> l0(x5) :|: x4 = x5 l3(x6) -> l0(x7) :|: x6 = x7 && 1 <= x6 l4(x8) -> l3(x9) :|: x8 = x9 Start term: l4(xHAT0) ---------------------------------------- (3) IRSwTTerminationDigraphProof (EQUIVALENT) Constructed termination digraph! Nodes: (1) l0(xHAT0) -> l2(xHATpost) :|: xHATpost = -1 + xHAT0 (2) l2(x) -> l1(x1) :|: x = x1 && 1 <= x (3) l2(x2) -> l1(x3) :|: x2 = x3 && 1 + x2 <= 0 (4) l1(x4) -> l0(x5) :|: x4 = x5 (5) l3(x6) -> l0(x7) :|: x6 = x7 && 1 <= x6 (6) l4(x8) -> l3(x9) :|: x8 = x9 Arcs: (1) -> (2), (3) (2) -> (4) (3) -> (4) (4) -> (1) (5) -> (1) (6) -> (5) This digraph is fully evaluated! ---------------------------------------- (4) Obligation: Termination digraph: Nodes: (1) l0(xHAT0) -> l2(xHATpost) :|: xHATpost = -1 + xHAT0 (2) l1(x4) -> l0(x5) :|: x4 = x5 (3) l2(x2) -> l1(x3) :|: x2 = x3 && 1 + x2 <= 0 (4) l2(x) -> l1(x1) :|: x = x1 && 1 <= x Arcs: (1) -> (3), (4) (2) -> (1) (3) -> (2) (4) -> (2) This digraph is fully evaluated! ---------------------------------------- (5) IntTRSCompressionProof (EQUIVALENT) Compressed rules. ---------------------------------------- (6) Obligation: Rules: l1(x4:0) -> l1(-1 + x4:0) :|: x4:0 < 1 l1(x) -> l1(-1 + x) :|: x > 1 ---------------------------------------- (7) TempFilterProof (SOUND) Used the following sort dictionary for filtering: l1(INTEGER) Replaced non-predefined constructor symbols by 0.The following proof was generated: # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty Termination of the given IntTRS could not be shown: - IntTRS - PolynomialOrderProcessor Rules: l1(x4:0) -> l1(c) :|: c = -1 + x4:0 && x4:0 < 1 l1(x) -> l1(c1) :|: c1 = -1 + x && x > 1 Found the following polynomial interpretation: [l1(x)] = -1 + x The following rules are decreasing: l1(x4:0) -> l1(c) :|: c = -1 + x4:0 && x4:0 < 1 l1(x) -> l1(c1) :|: c1 = -1 + x && x > 1 The following rules are bounded: l1(x) -> l1(c1) :|: c1 = -1 + x && x > 1 - IntTRS - PolynomialOrderProcessor - IntTRS Rules: l1(x4:0) -> l1(c) :|: c = -1 + x4:0 && x4:0 < 1 ---------------------------------------- (8) Obligation: Rules: l1(x4:0) -> l1(-1 + x4:0) :|: x4:0 < 1 ---------------------------------------- (9) IRSwTTerminationDigraphProof (EQUIVALENT) Constructed termination digraph! Nodes: (1) l1(x4:0) -> l1(-1 + x4:0) :|: x4:0 < 1 Arcs: (1) -> (1) This digraph is fully evaluated! ---------------------------------------- (10) Obligation: Termination digraph: Nodes: (1) l1(x4:0) -> l1(-1 + x4:0) :|: x4:0 < 1 Arcs: (1) -> (1) This digraph is fully evaluated!