YES proof of prog.inttrs # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty Termination of the given IRSwT could be proven: (0) IRSwT (1) IRSFormatTransformerProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (2) IRSwT (3) IRSwTTerminationDigraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 1108 ms] (4) AND (5) IRSwT (6) IntTRSCompressionProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (7) IRSwT (8) IntTRSUnneededArgumentFilterProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (9) IRSwT (10) TempFilterProof [SOUND, 10 ms] (11) IntTRS (12) PolynomialOrderProcessor [EQUIVALENT, 2 ms] (13) YES (14) IRSwT (15) IntTRSCompressionProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (16) IRSwT (17) IntTRSUnneededArgumentFilterProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (18) IRSwT (19) TempFilterProof [SOUND, 29 ms] (20) IntTRS (21) PolynomialOrderProcessor [EQUIVALENT, 10 ms] (22) YES ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: Rules: l0(iHAT0, jHAT0, y4HAT0, y6HAT0, y8HAT0) -> l1(iHATpost, jHATpost, y4HATpost, y6HATpost, y8HATpost) :|: y8HAT0 = y8HATpost && y6HAT0 = y6HATpost && y4HAT0 = y4HATpost && jHAT0 = jHATpost && iHAT0 = iHATpost l2(x, x1, x2, x3, x4) -> l3(x5, x6, x7, x8, x9) :|: x4 = x9 && x3 = x8 && x2 = x7 && x = x5 && x6 = 100 && 100 <= x l2(x10, x11, x12, x13, x14) -> l0(x15, x16, x17, x18, x19) :|: x14 = x19 && x13 = x18 && x11 = x16 && x10 = x15 && x17 = x10 && 1 + x10 <= 100 l4(x20, x21, x22, x23, x24) -> l3(x25, x26, x27, x28, x29) :|: x24 = x29 && x23 = x28 && x22 = x27 && x20 = x25 && x26 = 1 + x21 l5(x30, x31, x32, x33, x34) -> l2(x35, x36, x37, x38, x39) :|: x34 = x39 && x33 = x38 && x32 = x37 && x31 = x36 && x30 = x35 l6(x40, x41, x42, x43, x44) -> l4(x45, x46, x47, x48, x49) :|: x44 = x49 && x43 = x48 && x42 = x47 && x41 = x46 && x40 = x45 l7(x50, x51, x52, x53, x54) -> l8(x55, x56, x57, x58, x59) :|: x54 = x59 && x53 = x58 && x52 = x57 && x51 = x56 && x50 = x55 && 200 <= x51 l7(x60, x61, x62, x63, x64) -> l6(x65, x66, x67, x68, x69) :|: x63 = x68 && x62 = x67 && x61 = x66 && x60 = x65 && x69 = x61 && 1 + x61 <= 200 l3(x70, x71, x72, x73, x74) -> l7(x75, x76, x77, x78, x79) :|: x74 = x79 && x73 = x78 && x72 = x77 && x71 = x76 && x70 = x75 l9(x80, x81, x82, x83, x84) -> l5(x85, x86, x87, x88, x89) :|: x84 = x89 && x83 = x88 && x82 = x87 && x81 = x86 && x85 = 1 + x80 l10(x90, x91, x92, x93, x94) -> l9(x95, x96, x97, x98, x99) :|: x94 = x99 && x93 = x98 && x92 = x97 && x91 = x96 && x90 = x95 l1(x100, x101, x102, x103, x104) -> l10(x105, x106, x107, x108, x109) :|: x104 = x109 && x102 = x107 && x101 = x106 && x100 = x105 && x108 = x100 l11(x110, x111, x112, x113, x114) -> l5(x115, x116, x117, x118, x119) :|: x114 = x119 && x113 = x118 && x112 = x117 && x111 = x116 && x115 = 0 l12(x120, x121, x122, x123, x124) -> l11(x125, x126, x127, x128, x129) :|: x124 = x129 && x123 = x128 && x122 = x127 && x121 = x126 && x120 = x125 Start term: l12(iHAT0, jHAT0, y4HAT0, y6HAT0, y8HAT0) ---------------------------------------- (1) IRSFormatTransformerProof (EQUIVALENT) Reformatted IRS to match normalized format (transformed away non-linear left-hand sides, !=, / and %). ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: Rules: l0(iHAT0, jHAT0, y4HAT0, y6HAT0, y8HAT0) -> l1(iHATpost, jHATpost, y4HATpost, y6HATpost, y8HATpost) :|: y8HAT0 = y8HATpost && y6HAT0 = y6HATpost && y4HAT0 = y4HATpost && jHAT0 = jHATpost && iHAT0 = iHATpost l2(x, x1, x2, x3, x4) -> l3(x5, x6, x7, x8, x9) :|: x4 = x9 && x3 = x8 && x2 = x7 && x = x5 && x6 = 100 && 100 <= x l2(x10, x11, x12, x13, x14) -> l0(x15, x16, x17, x18, x19) :|: x14 = x19 && x13 = x18 && x11 = x16 && x10 = x15 && x17 = x10 && 1 + x10 <= 100 l4(x20, x21, x22, x23, x24) -> l3(x25, x26, x27, x28, x29) :|: x24 = x29 && x23 = x28 && x22 = x27 && x20 = x25 && x26 = 1 + x21 l5(x30, x31, x32, x33, x34) -> l2(x35, x36, x37, x38, x39) :|: x34 = x39 && x33 = x38 && x32 = x37 && x31 = x36 && x30 = x35 l6(x40, x41, x42, x43, x44) -> l4(x45, x46, x47, x48, x49) :|: x44 = x49 && x43 = x48 && x42 = x47 && x41 = x46 && x40 = x45 l7(x50, x51, x52, x53, x54) -> l8(x55, x56, x57, x58, x59) :|: x54 = x59 && x53 = x58 && x52 = x57 && x51 = x56 && x50 = x55 && 200 <= x51 l7(x60, x61, x62, x63, x64) -> l6(x65, x66, x67, x68, x69) :|: x63 = x68 && x62 = x67 && x61 = x66 && x60 = x65 && x69 = x61 && 1 + x61 <= 200 l3(x70, x71, x72, x73, x74) -> l7(x75, x76, x77, x78, x79) :|: x74 = x79 && x73 = x78 && x72 = x77 && x71 = x76 && x70 = x75 l9(x80, x81, x82, x83, x84) -> l5(x85, x86, x87, x88, x89) :|: x84 = x89 && x83 = x88 && x82 = x87 && x81 = x86 && x85 = 1 + x80 l10(x90, x91, x92, x93, x94) -> l9(x95, x96, x97, x98, x99) :|: x94 = x99 && x93 = x98 && x92 = x97 && x91 = x96 && x90 = x95 l1(x100, x101, x102, x103, x104) -> l10(x105, x106, x107, x108, x109) :|: x104 = x109 && x102 = x107 && x101 = x106 && x100 = x105 && x108 = x100 l11(x110, x111, x112, x113, x114) -> l5(x115, x116, x117, x118, x119) :|: x114 = x119 && x113 = x118 && x112 = x117 && x111 = x116 && x115 = 0 l12(x120, x121, x122, x123, x124) -> l11(x125, x126, x127, x128, x129) :|: x124 = x129 && x123 = x128 && x122 = x127 && x121 = x126 && x120 = x125 Start term: l12(iHAT0, jHAT0, y4HAT0, y6HAT0, y8HAT0) ---------------------------------------- (3) IRSwTTerminationDigraphProof (EQUIVALENT) Constructed termination digraph! Nodes: (1) l0(iHAT0, jHAT0, y4HAT0, y6HAT0, y8HAT0) -> l1(iHATpost, jHATpost, y4HATpost, y6HATpost, y8HATpost) :|: y8HAT0 = y8HATpost && y6HAT0 = y6HATpost && y4HAT0 = y4HATpost && jHAT0 = jHATpost && iHAT0 = iHATpost (2) l2(x, x1, x2, x3, x4) -> l3(x5, x6, x7, x8, x9) :|: x4 = x9 && x3 = x8 && x2 = x7 && x = x5 && x6 = 100 && 100 <= x (3) l2(x10, x11, x12, x13, x14) -> l0(x15, x16, x17, x18, x19) :|: x14 = x19 && x13 = x18 && x11 = x16 && x10 = x15 && x17 = x10 && 1 + x10 <= 100 (4) l4(x20, x21, x22, x23, x24) -> l3(x25, x26, x27, x28, x29) :|: x24 = x29 && x23 = x28 && x22 = x27 && x20 = x25 && x26 = 1 + x21 (5) l5(x30, x31, x32, x33, x34) -> l2(x35, x36, x37, x38, x39) :|: x34 = x39 && x33 = x38 && x32 = x37 && x31 = x36 && x30 = x35 (6) l6(x40, x41, x42, x43, x44) -> l4(x45, x46, x47, x48, x49) :|: x44 = x49 && x43 = x48 && x42 = x47 && x41 = x46 && x40 = x45 (7) l7(x50, x51, x52, x53, x54) -> l8(x55, x56, x57, x58, x59) :|: x54 = x59 && x53 = x58 && x52 = x57 && x51 = x56 && x50 = x55 && 200 <= x51 (8) l7(x60, x61, x62, x63, x64) -> l6(x65, x66, x67, x68, x69) :|: x63 = x68 && x62 = x67 && x61 = x66 && x60 = x65 && x69 = x61 && 1 + x61 <= 200 (9) l3(x70, x71, x72, x73, x74) -> l7(x75, x76, x77, x78, x79) :|: x74 = x79 && x73 = x78 && x72 = x77 && x71 = x76 && x70 = x75 (10) l9(x80, x81, x82, x83, x84) -> l5(x85, x86, x87, x88, x89) :|: x84 = x89 && x83 = x88 && x82 = x87 && x81 = x86 && x85 = 1 + x80 (11) l10(x90, x91, x92, x93, x94) -> l9(x95, x96, x97, x98, x99) :|: x94 = x99 && x93 = x98 && x92 = x97 && x91 = x96 && x90 = x95 (12) l1(x100, x101, x102, x103, x104) -> l10(x105, x106, x107, x108, x109) :|: x104 = x109 && x102 = x107 && x101 = x106 && x100 = x105 && x108 = x100 (13) l11(x110, x111, x112, x113, x114) -> l5(x115, x116, x117, x118, x119) :|: x114 = x119 && x113 = x118 && x112 = x117 && x111 = x116 && x115 = 0 (14) l12(x120, x121, x122, x123, x124) -> l11(x125, x126, x127, x128, x129) :|: x124 = x129 && x123 = x128 && x122 = x127 && x121 = x126 && x120 = x125 Arcs: (1) -> (12) (2) -> (9) (3) -> (1) (4) -> (9) (5) -> (2), (3) (6) -> (4) (8) -> (6) (9) -> (7), (8) (10) -> (5) (11) -> (10) (12) -> (11) (13) -> (5) (14) -> (13) This digraph is fully evaluated! ---------------------------------------- (4) Complex Obligation (AND) ---------------------------------------- (5) Obligation: Termination digraph: Nodes: (1) l0(iHAT0, jHAT0, y4HAT0, y6HAT0, y8HAT0) -> l1(iHATpost, jHATpost, y4HATpost, y6HATpost, y8HATpost) :|: y8HAT0 = y8HATpost && y6HAT0 = y6HATpost && y4HAT0 = y4HATpost && jHAT0 = jHATpost && iHAT0 = iHATpost (2) l2(x10, x11, x12, x13, x14) -> l0(x15, x16, x17, x18, x19) :|: x14 = x19 && x13 = x18 && x11 = x16 && x10 = x15 && x17 = x10 && 1 + x10 <= 100 (3) l5(x30, x31, x32, x33, x34) -> l2(x35, x36, x37, x38, x39) :|: x34 = x39 && x33 = x38 && x32 = x37 && x31 = x36 && x30 = x35 (4) l9(x80, x81, x82, x83, x84) -> l5(x85, x86, x87, x88, x89) :|: x84 = x89 && x83 = x88 && x82 = x87 && x81 = x86 && x85 = 1 + x80 (5) l10(x90, x91, x92, x93, x94) -> l9(x95, x96, x97, x98, x99) :|: x94 = x99 && x93 = x98 && x92 = x97 && x91 = x96 && x90 = x95 (6) l1(x100, x101, x102, x103, x104) -> l10(x105, x106, x107, x108, x109) :|: x104 = x109 && x102 = x107 && x101 = x106 && x100 = x105 && x108 = x100 Arcs: (1) -> (6) (2) -> (1) (3) -> (2) (4) -> (3) (5) -> (4) (6) -> (5) This digraph is fully evaluated! ---------------------------------------- (6) IntTRSCompressionProof (EQUIVALENT) Compressed rules. ---------------------------------------- (7) Obligation: Rules: l10(x90:0, jHATpost:0, x37:0, x18:0, x109:0) -> l10(1 + x90:0, jHATpost:0, 1 + x90:0, 1 + x90:0, x109:0) :|: x90:0 < 99 ---------------------------------------- (8) IntTRSUnneededArgumentFilterProof (EQUIVALENT) Some arguments are removed because they cannot influence termination. We removed arguments according to the following replacements: l10(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5) -> l10(x1) ---------------------------------------- (9) Obligation: Rules: l10(x90:0) -> l10(1 + x90:0) :|: x90:0 < 99 ---------------------------------------- (10) TempFilterProof (SOUND) Used the following sort dictionary for filtering: l10(INTEGER) Replaced non-predefined constructor symbols by 0. ---------------------------------------- (11) Obligation: Rules: l10(x90:0) -> l10(c) :|: c = 1 + x90:0 && x90:0 < 99 ---------------------------------------- (12) PolynomialOrderProcessor (EQUIVALENT) Found the following polynomial interpretation: [l10(x)] = 98 - x The following rules are decreasing: l10(x90:0) -> l10(c) :|: c = 1 + x90:0 && x90:0 < 99 The following rules are bounded: l10(x90:0) -> l10(c) :|: c = 1 + x90:0 && x90:0 < 99 ---------------------------------------- (13) YES ---------------------------------------- (14) Obligation: Termination digraph: Nodes: (1) l3(x70, x71, x72, x73, x74) -> l7(x75, x76, x77, x78, x79) :|: x74 = x79 && x73 = x78 && x72 = x77 && x71 = x76 && x70 = x75 (2) l4(x20, x21, x22, x23, x24) -> l3(x25, x26, x27, x28, x29) :|: x24 = x29 && x23 = x28 && x22 = x27 && x20 = x25 && x26 = 1 + x21 (3) l6(x40, x41, x42, x43, x44) -> l4(x45, x46, x47, x48, x49) :|: x44 = x49 && x43 = x48 && x42 = x47 && x41 = x46 && x40 = x45 (4) l7(x60, x61, x62, x63, x64) -> l6(x65, x66, x67, x68, x69) :|: x63 = x68 && x62 = x67 && x61 = x66 && x60 = x65 && x69 = x61 && 1 + x61 <= 200 Arcs: (1) -> (4) (2) -> (1) (3) -> (2) (4) -> (3) This digraph is fully evaluated! ---------------------------------------- (15) IntTRSCompressionProof (EQUIVALENT) Compressed rules. ---------------------------------------- (16) Obligation: Rules: l6(x25:0, x41:0, x27:0, x28:0, x29:0) -> l6(x25:0, 1 + x41:0, x27:0, x28:0, 1 + x41:0) :|: x41:0 < 199 ---------------------------------------- (17) IntTRSUnneededArgumentFilterProof (EQUIVALENT) Some arguments are removed because they cannot influence termination. We removed arguments according to the following replacements: l6(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5) -> l6(x2) ---------------------------------------- (18) Obligation: Rules: l6(x41:0) -> l6(1 + x41:0) :|: x41:0 < 199 ---------------------------------------- (19) TempFilterProof (SOUND) Used the following sort dictionary for filtering: l6(INTEGER) Replaced non-predefined constructor symbols by 0. ---------------------------------------- (20) Obligation: Rules: l6(x41:0) -> l6(c) :|: c = 1 + x41:0 && x41:0 < 199 ---------------------------------------- (21) PolynomialOrderProcessor (EQUIVALENT) Found the following polynomial interpretation: [l6(x)] = 198 - x The following rules are decreasing: l6(x41:0) -> l6(c) :|: c = 1 + x41:0 && x41:0 < 199 The following rules are bounded: l6(x41:0) -> l6(c) :|: c = 1 + x41:0 && x41:0 < 199 ---------------------------------------- (22) YES