YES
proof of prog.inttrs
# AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty


Termination of the given IRSwT could be proven:

(0) IRSwT
(1) IRSFormatTransformerProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms]
(2) IRSwT
(3) IRSwTTerminationDigraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 210 ms]
(4) IRSwT
(5) IntTRSCompressionProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms]
(6) IRSwT
(7) IntTRSUnneededArgumentFilterProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms]
(8) IRSwT
(9) IRSwTChainingProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms]
(10) IRSwT
(11) IRSwTTerminationDigraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms]
(12) IRSwT
(13) IntTRSCompressionProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms]
(14) IRSwT
(15) IRSwTChainingProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms]
(16) IRSwT
(17) IRSwTTerminationDigraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 5 ms]
(18) IRSwT
(19) IntTRSCompressionProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms]
(20) IRSwT
(21) TempFilterProof [SOUND, 31 ms]
(22) IntTRS
(23) PolynomialOrderProcessor [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms]
(24) YES


----------------------------------------

(0)
Obligation:
Rules:
l0(rt_11HAT0, st_14HAT0, x_15HAT0, y_13HAT0) -> l1(rt_11HATpost, st_14HATpost, x_15HATpost, y_13HATpost) :|: y_13HAT0 = y_13HATpost && x_15HAT0 = x_15HATpost && st_14HAT0 = st_14HATpost && rt_11HATpost = st_14HAT0 && 1 + y_13HAT0 <= 1
l0(x, x1, x2, x3) -> l2(x4, x5, x6, x7) :|: x3 = x7 && x2 = x6 && x1 = x5 && x = x4 && 1 <= x3
l2(x8, x9, x10, x11) -> l1(x12, x13, x14, x15) :|: x11 = x15 && x10 = x14 && x9 = x13 && x12 = x9 && x10 <= 0
l2(x16, x17, x18, x19) -> l3(x20, x21, x22, x23) :|: x17 = x21 && x16 = x20 && x23 = 1 + x19 && x22 = x18 - x19 && 1 <= x18
l3(x24, x25, x26, x27) -> l2(x28, x29, x30, x31) :|: x27 = x31 && x26 = x30 && x25 = x29 && x24 = x28
l4(x32, x33, x34, x35) -> l0(x36, x37, x38, x39) :|: x35 = x39 && x34 = x38 && x33 = x37 && x32 = x36
Start term: l4(rt_11HAT0, st_14HAT0, x_15HAT0, y_13HAT0)

----------------------------------------

(1) IRSFormatTransformerProof (EQUIVALENT)
Reformatted IRS to match normalized format (transformed away non-linear left-hand sides, !=, / and %).
----------------------------------------

(2)
Obligation:
Rules:
l0(rt_11HAT0, st_14HAT0, x_15HAT0, y_13HAT0) -> l1(rt_11HATpost, st_14HATpost, x_15HATpost, y_13HATpost) :|: y_13HAT0 = y_13HATpost && x_15HAT0 = x_15HATpost && st_14HAT0 = st_14HATpost && rt_11HATpost = st_14HAT0 && 1 + y_13HAT0 <= 1
l0(x, x1, x2, x3) -> l2(x4, x5, x6, x7) :|: x3 = x7 && x2 = x6 && x1 = x5 && x = x4 && 1 <= x3
l2(x8, x9, x10, x11) -> l1(x12, x13, x14, x15) :|: x11 = x15 && x10 = x14 && x9 = x13 && x12 = x9 && x10 <= 0
l2(x16, x17, x18, x19) -> l3(x20, x21, x22, x23) :|: x17 = x21 && x16 = x20 && x23 = 1 + x19 && x22 = x18 - x19 && 1 <= x18
l3(x24, x25, x26, x27) -> l2(x28, x29, x30, x31) :|: x27 = x31 && x26 = x30 && x25 = x29 && x24 = x28
l4(x32, x33, x34, x35) -> l0(x36, x37, x38, x39) :|: x35 = x39 && x34 = x38 && x33 = x37 && x32 = x36
Start term: l4(rt_11HAT0, st_14HAT0, x_15HAT0, y_13HAT0)

----------------------------------------

(3) IRSwTTerminationDigraphProof (EQUIVALENT)
Constructed termination digraph!
Nodes:
(1) l0(rt_11HAT0, st_14HAT0, x_15HAT0, y_13HAT0) -> l1(rt_11HATpost, st_14HATpost, x_15HATpost, y_13HATpost) :|: y_13HAT0 = y_13HATpost && x_15HAT0 = x_15HATpost && st_14HAT0 = st_14HATpost && rt_11HATpost = st_14HAT0 && 1 + y_13HAT0 <= 1
(2) l0(x, x1, x2, x3) -> l2(x4, x5, x6, x7) :|: x3 = x7 && x2 = x6 && x1 = x5 && x = x4 && 1 <= x3
(3) l2(x8, x9, x10, x11) -> l1(x12, x13, x14, x15) :|: x11 = x15 && x10 = x14 && x9 = x13 && x12 = x9 && x10 <= 0
(4) l2(x16, x17, x18, x19) -> l3(x20, x21, x22, x23) :|: x17 = x21 && x16 = x20 && x23 = 1 + x19 && x22 = x18 - x19 && 1 <= x18
(5) l3(x24, x25, x26, x27) -> l2(x28, x29, x30, x31) :|: x27 = x31 && x26 = x30 && x25 = x29 && x24 = x28
(6) l4(x32, x33, x34, x35) -> l0(x36, x37, x38, x39) :|: x35 = x39 && x34 = x38 && x33 = x37 && x32 = x36

Arcs:
(2) -> (3), (4)
(4) -> (5)
(5) -> (3), (4)
(6) -> (1), (2)

This digraph is fully evaluated!
----------------------------------------

(4)
Obligation:

Termination digraph:
Nodes:
(1) l2(x16, x17, x18, x19) -> l3(x20, x21, x22, x23) :|: x17 = x21 && x16 = x20 && x23 = 1 + x19 && x22 = x18 - x19 && 1 <= x18
(2) l3(x24, x25, x26, x27) -> l2(x28, x29, x30, x31) :|: x27 = x31 && x26 = x30 && x25 = x29 && x24 = x28

Arcs:
(1) -> (2)
(2) -> (1)

This digraph is fully evaluated!

----------------------------------------

(5) IntTRSCompressionProof (EQUIVALENT)
Compressed rules.
----------------------------------------

(6)
Obligation:
Rules:
l2(x16:0, x17:0, x18:0, x19:0) -> l2(x16:0, x17:0, x18:0 - x19:0, 1 + x19:0) :|: x18:0 > 0

----------------------------------------

(7) IntTRSUnneededArgumentFilterProof (EQUIVALENT)
Some arguments are removed because they cannot influence termination. We removed arguments according to the following replacements:

   l2(x1, x2, x3, x4) -> l2(x3, x4)

----------------------------------------

(8)
Obligation:
Rules:
l2(x18:0, x19:0) -> l2(x18:0 - x19:0, 1 + x19:0) :|: x18:0 > 0

----------------------------------------

(9) IRSwTChainingProof (EQUIVALENT)
Chaining!
----------------------------------------

(10)
Obligation:
Rules:
l2(x, x1) -> l2(x + -2 * x1 + -1, 2 + x1) :|: TRUE && x >= 1 && x + -1 * x1 >= 1

----------------------------------------

(11) IRSwTTerminationDigraphProof (EQUIVALENT)
Constructed termination digraph!
Nodes:
(1) l2(x, x1) -> l2(x + -2 * x1 + -1, 2 + x1) :|: TRUE && x >= 1 && x + -1 * x1 >= 1

Arcs:
(1) -> (1)

This digraph is fully evaluated!
----------------------------------------

(12)
Obligation:

Termination digraph:
Nodes:
(1) l2(x, x1) -> l2(x + -2 * x1 + -1, 2 + x1) :|: TRUE && x >= 1 && x + -1 * x1 >= 1

Arcs:
(1) -> (1)

This digraph is fully evaluated!

----------------------------------------

(13) IntTRSCompressionProof (EQUIVALENT)
Compressed rules.
----------------------------------------

(14)
Obligation:
Rules:
l2(x:0, x1:0) -> l2(x:0 + -2 * x1:0 - 1, 2 + x1:0) :|: x:0 + -1 * x1:0 >= 1 && x:0 > 0

----------------------------------------

(15) IRSwTChainingProof (EQUIVALENT)
Chaining!
----------------------------------------

(16)
Obligation:
Rules:
l2(x, x1) -> l2(x + -4 * x1 + -6, 4 + x1) :|: TRUE && x + -1 * x1 >= 1 && x >= 1 && x + -3 * x1 >= 4 && x + -2 * x1 >= 2

----------------------------------------

(17) IRSwTTerminationDigraphProof (EQUIVALENT)
Constructed termination digraph!
Nodes:
(1) l2(x, x1) -> l2(x + -4 * x1 + -6, 4 + x1) :|: TRUE && x + -1 * x1 >= 1 && x >= 1 && x + -3 * x1 >= 4 && x + -2 * x1 >= 2

Arcs:
(1) -> (1)

This digraph is fully evaluated!
----------------------------------------

(18)
Obligation:

Termination digraph:
Nodes:
(1) l2(x, x1) -> l2(x + -4 * x1 + -6, 4 + x1) :|: TRUE && x + -1 * x1 >= 1 && x >= 1 && x + -3 * x1 >= 4 && x + -2 * x1 >= 2

Arcs:
(1) -> (1)

This digraph is fully evaluated!

----------------------------------------

(19) IntTRSCompressionProof (EQUIVALENT)
Compressed rules.
----------------------------------------

(20)
Obligation:
Rules:
l2(x:0, x1:0) -> l2(x:0 + -4 * x1:0 - 6, 4 + x1:0) :|: x:0 + -3 * x1:0 >= 4 && x:0 + -2 * x1:0 >= 2 && x:0 + -1 * x1:0 >= 1 && x:0 > 0

----------------------------------------

(21) TempFilterProof (SOUND)
Used the following sort dictionary for filtering: 
l2(INTEGER, INTEGER)
Replaced non-predefined constructor symbols by 0.
----------------------------------------

(22)
Obligation:
Rules:
l2(x:0, x1:0) -> l2(c, c1) :|: c1 = 4 + x1:0 && c = x:0 + -4 * x1:0 - 6 && (x:0 + -3 * x1:0 >= 4 && x:0 + -2 * x1:0 >= 2 && x:0 + -1 * x1:0 >= 1 && x:0 > 0)

----------------------------------------

(23) PolynomialOrderProcessor (EQUIVALENT)
Found the following polynomial interpretation:
[l2(x, x1)] = -2 + 2*x - 2*x1 + x1^2

The following rules are decreasing:
l2(x:0, x1:0) -> l2(c, c1) :|: c1 = 4 + x1:0 && c = x:0 + -4 * x1:0 - 6 && (x:0 + -3 * x1:0 >= 4 && x:0 + -2 * x1:0 >= 2 && x:0 + -1 * x1:0 >= 1 && x:0 > 0)
The following rules are bounded:
l2(x:0, x1:0) -> l2(c, c1) :|: c1 = 4 + x1:0 && c = x:0 + -4 * x1:0 - 6 && (x:0 + -3 * x1:0 >= 4 && x:0 + -2 * x1:0 >= 2 && x:0 + -1 * x1:0 >= 1 && x:0 > 0)

----------------------------------------

(24)
YES