YES Solver Timeout: 4 Global Timeout: 60 Maximum number of concurrent processes: 900 ******************************************************************************************* *********************** UNPROCESSED TRANSITION SYSTEMS PER FUNCTION *********************** ******************************************************************************************* List of LLVMGraphs + assumeNodes + staticAssertNodes [1] : +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ main +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ + + Init Location: 0 Transitions: 0, main_y1 -> ¿functionCall(__VERIFIER_nondet_int), main_y2 -> ¿functionCall(__VERIFIER_nondet_int)}> 0))> 0)> 0)> 0))> main_y2)> main_y2))> (main_y1 - main_y2)}> (main_y2 - main_y1)}> 0}> Fresh variables: Undef variables: Abstraction variables: Exit nodes: Accepting locations: Asserts: + Assume Nodes [0]: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ + Static Assert Nodes [0]: +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ + After preprocess (paralelization): ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Init Location: 0 Transitions: 0}> ¿functionCall(__VERIFIER_nondet_int)}> varCall_1}> ¿functionCall(__VERIFIER_nondet_int)}> varCall_2}> 0)> 0))> 0)> 0))> main_y2)> main_y2))> (main_y1 - main_y2)}> (main_y2 - main_y1)}> 0}> Fresh variables: Undef variables: Abstraction variables: Exit nodes: 13, Accepting locations: Asserts: + + +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ main +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Function Return and Parameters Information [2 functions]: function name: __VERIFIER_nondet_int [1 return + 0 parameters] demangled: __VERIFIER_nondet_int __VERIFIER_nondet_int__func_return_ [function result] : int function name: main [1 return + 0 parameters] demangled: main main__func_return_ [function result] : int AST Ident Scanner Information [4 idents]: __VERIFIER_nondet_int | function | [integer, ()] | | main | function | [integer, ()] | y1 | local variable | integer | | y2 | local variable | integer | | Main function: main Preprocessed LLVMGraph Init Location: 0 Transitions: 0) /\ (undef4 > 0)> 0) /\ not((undef4 > 0))> 0))> main_y2)), par{main_y2 -> (main_y2 - main_y1)}> main_y2) /\ (main_y1 > main_y2), par{main_y1 -> (main_y1 - main_y2)}> Fresh variables: undef3, undef4, Undef variables: undef3, undef4, Abstraction variables: Exit nodes: 13, Accepting locations: Asserts: ************************************************************* ******************************************************************************************* *********************** WORKING TRANSITION SYSTEM (DAG) *********************** ******************************************************************************************* Init Location: 0 Graph 0: Transitions: Variables: Graph 1: Transitions: -main_y1 + main_y2, rest remain the same}> main_y1 - main_y2, rest remain the same}> Variables: main_y1, main_y2 Graph 2: Transitions: Variables: Precedence: Graph 0 Graph 1 Graph 2 Map Locations to Subgraph: ( 0 , 0 ) ( 4 , 1 ) ( 13 , 2 ) ******************************************************************************************* ******************************** CHECKING ASSERTIONS ******************************** ******************************************************************************************* Proving termination of subgraph 0 Proving termination of subgraph 1 Checking unfeasibility... Time used: 0.004311 Checking conditional termination of SCC {l4}... LOG: CALL solveLinear LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.000887s LOG: CALL solveLinear LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.003201s [26613 : 26615] [26613 : 26616] Successful child: 26615 [ Invariant Graph ] Strengthening and disabling transitions... LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): -main_y1 + main_y2, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): main_y1 - main_y2, rest remain the same}> [ Termination Graph ] Strengthening and disabling transitions... LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): -main_y1 + main_y2, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): main_y1 - main_y2, rest remain the same}> Ranking function: 1 + main_y2 New Graphs: Transitions: main_y1 - main_y2, rest remain the same}> Variables: main_y1, main_y2 Checking conditional termination of SCC {l4}... LOG: CALL solveLinear LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.000561s LOG: CALL solveLinear LOG: RETURN solveLinear - Elapsed time: 0.001788s [26613 : 26620] [26613 : 26621] Successful child: 26620 [ Invariant Graph ] Strengthening and disabling transitions... LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): -main_y1 + main_y2, rest remain the same}> LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): main_y1 - main_y2, rest remain the same}> [ Termination Graph ] Strengthening and disabling transitions... LOG: CALL solverLinear in Graph for feasibility LOG: RETURN solveLinear in Graph for feasibility Strengthening transition (result): main_y1 - main_y2, rest remain the same}> Ranking function: main_y1 New Graphs: INVARIANTS: 4: 1 <= main_y1 , Quasi-INVARIANTS to narrow Graph: 4: INVARIANTS: 4: 1 <= main_y2 , Quasi-INVARIANTS to narrow Graph: 4: Proving termination of subgraph 2 Analyzing SCC {l13}... No cycles found. Program Terminates