WORST_CASE(Omega(1),?) ### Pre-processing the ITS problem ### Initial linear ITS problem Start location: __init 0: f1 -> f2 : arg1'=arg1P_1, arg2'=arg2P_1, [ arg2==arg2P_1 ], cost: 1 1: f2 -> f3 : arg1'=arg1P_2, arg2'=arg2P_2, [ arg1==arg1P_2 ], cost: 1 9: f3 -> f4 : arg1'=arg1P_10, arg2'=arg2P_10, [ arg1>=0 && arg1==arg1P_10 && arg2==arg2P_10 ], cost: 1 11: f3 -> f11 : arg1'=arg1P_12, arg2'=arg2P_12, [ arg1<0 && arg1==arg1P_12 && arg2==arg2P_12 ], cost: 1 2: f4 -> f5 : arg1'=arg1P_3, arg2'=arg2P_3, [ arg1P_3==arg2+arg1 && arg2==arg2P_3 ], cost: 1 5: f5 -> f6 : arg1'=arg1P_6, arg2'=arg2P_6, [ arg2>=0 && arg1==arg1P_6 && arg2==arg2P_6 ], cost: 1 6: f5 -> f7 : arg1'=arg1P_7, arg2'=arg2P_7, [ arg2<0 && arg1==arg1P_7 && arg2==arg2P_7 ], cost: 1 3: f6 -> f9 : arg1'=arg1P_4, arg2'=arg2P_4, [ arg2P_4==-1-arg2 && arg1==arg1P_4 ], cost: 1 7: f9 -> f8 : arg1'=arg1P_8, arg2'=arg2P_8, [ arg1==arg1P_8 && arg2==arg2P_8 ], cost: 1 4: f7 -> f10 : arg1'=arg1P_5, arg2'=arg2P_5, [ arg2P_5==-arg2 && arg1==arg1P_5 ], cost: 1 8: f10 -> f8 : arg1'=arg1P_9, arg2'=arg2P_9, [ arg1==arg1P_9 && arg2==arg2P_9 ], cost: 1 10: f8 -> f3 : arg1'=arg1P_11, arg2'=arg2P_11, [ arg1==arg1P_11 && arg2==arg2P_11 ], cost: 1 12: __init -> f1 : arg1'=arg1P_13, arg2'=arg2P_13, [], cost: 1 Checking for constant complexity: The following rule is satisfiable with cost >= 1, yielding constant complexity: 12: __init -> f1 : arg1'=arg1P_13, arg2'=arg2P_13, [], cost: 1 Removed unreachable and leaf rules: Start location: __init 0: f1 -> f2 : arg1'=arg1P_1, arg2'=arg2P_1, [ arg2==arg2P_1 ], cost: 1 1: f2 -> f3 : arg1'=arg1P_2, arg2'=arg2P_2, [ arg1==arg1P_2 ], cost: 1 9: f3 -> f4 : arg1'=arg1P_10, arg2'=arg2P_10, [ arg1>=0 && arg1==arg1P_10 && arg2==arg2P_10 ], cost: 1 2: f4 -> f5 : arg1'=arg1P_3, arg2'=arg2P_3, [ arg1P_3==arg2+arg1 && arg2==arg2P_3 ], cost: 1 5: f5 -> f6 : arg1'=arg1P_6, arg2'=arg2P_6, [ arg2>=0 && arg1==arg1P_6 && arg2==arg2P_6 ], cost: 1 6: f5 -> f7 : arg1'=arg1P_7, arg2'=arg2P_7, [ arg2<0 && arg1==arg1P_7 && arg2==arg2P_7 ], cost: 1 3: f6 -> f9 : arg1'=arg1P_4, arg2'=arg2P_4, [ arg2P_4==-1-arg2 && arg1==arg1P_4 ], cost: 1 7: f9 -> f8 : arg1'=arg1P_8, arg2'=arg2P_8, [ arg1==arg1P_8 && arg2==arg2P_8 ], cost: 1 4: f7 -> f10 : arg1'=arg1P_5, arg2'=arg2P_5, [ arg2P_5==-arg2 && arg1==arg1P_5 ], cost: 1 8: f10 -> f8 : arg1'=arg1P_9, arg2'=arg2P_9, [ arg1==arg1P_9 && arg2==arg2P_9 ], cost: 1 10: f8 -> f3 : arg1'=arg1P_11, arg2'=arg2P_11, [ arg1==arg1P_11 && arg2==arg2P_11 ], cost: 1 12: __init -> f1 : arg1'=arg1P_13, arg2'=arg2P_13, [], cost: 1 Simplified all rules, resulting in: Start location: __init 0: f1 -> f2 : arg1'=arg1P_1, [], cost: 1 1: f2 -> f3 : arg2'=arg2P_2, [], cost: 1 9: f3 -> f4 : [ arg1>=0 ], cost: 1 2: f4 -> f5 : arg1'=arg2+arg1, [], cost: 1 5: f5 -> f6 : [ arg2>=0 ], cost: 1 6: f5 -> f7 : [ arg2<0 ], cost: 1 3: f6 -> f9 : arg2'=-1-arg2, [], cost: 1 7: f9 -> f8 : [], cost: 1 4: f7 -> f10 : arg2'=-arg2, [], cost: 1 8: f10 -> f8 : [], cost: 1 10: f8 -> f3 : [], cost: 1 12: __init -> f1 : arg1'=arg1P_13, arg2'=arg2P_13, [], cost: 1 ### Simplification by acceleration and chaining ### Eliminated locations (on linear paths): Start location: __init 15: f3 -> f5 : arg1'=arg2+arg1, [ arg1>=0 ], cost: 2 18: f5 -> f8 : arg2'=-1-arg2, [ arg2>=0 ], cost: 3 19: f5 -> f8 : arg2'=-arg2, [ arg2<0 ], cost: 3 10: f8 -> f3 : [], cost: 1 14: __init -> f3 : arg1'=arg1P_1, arg2'=arg2P_2, [], cost: 3 Eliminated locations (on tree-shaped paths): Start location: __init 20: f3 -> f8 : arg1'=arg2+arg1, arg2'=-1-arg2, [ arg1>=0 && arg2>=0 ], cost: 5 21: f3 -> f8 : arg1'=arg2+arg1, arg2'=-arg2, [ arg1>=0 && arg2<0 ], cost: 5 10: f8 -> f3 : [], cost: 1 14: __init -> f3 : arg1'=arg1P_1, arg2'=arg2P_2, [], cost: 3 Eliminated locations (on tree-shaped paths): Start location: __init 22: f3 -> f3 : arg1'=arg2+arg1, arg2'=-1-arg2, [ arg1>=0 && arg2>=0 ], cost: 6 23: f3 -> f3 : arg1'=arg2+arg1, arg2'=-arg2, [ arg1>=0 && arg2<0 ], cost: 6 14: __init -> f3 : arg1'=arg1P_1, arg2'=arg2P_2, [], cost: 3 Accelerating simple loops of location 2. Accelerating the following rules: 22: f3 -> f3 : arg1'=arg2+arg1, arg2'=-1-arg2, [ arg1>=0 && arg2>=0 ], cost: 6 23: f3 -> f3 : arg1'=arg2+arg1, arg2'=-arg2, [ arg1>=0 && arg2<0 ], cost: 6 Failed to prove monotonicity of the guard of rule 22. Failed to prove monotonicity of the guard of rule 23. [accelerate] Nesting with 2 inner and 2 outer candidates Nested simple loops 23 (outer loop) and 22 (inner loop) with Rule(2 | arg2>=0, arg2+arg1>=0, 1+arg1>=0, 0>=0, | 12+12*arg1 || 2 | 0=-1, 1=1+arg2+arg1, ), resulting in the new rules: 24, 25. Nested simple loops 22 (outer loop) and 23 (inner loop) with Rule(2 | arg1>=0, arg2<0, 1+arg2+arg1>=0, 0>=0, | 12+12*arg2+12*arg1 || 2 | 1=-1-arg1, ), resulting in the new rules: 26, 27. Removing the simple loops: 22 23. Accelerated all simple loops using metering functions (where possible): Start location: __init 24: f3 -> f3 : arg1'=-1, arg2'=1+arg2+arg1, [ arg2>=0 && arg2+arg1>=0 && 1+arg1>=0 ], cost: 12+12*arg1 25: f3 -> f3 : arg1'=-1, arg2'=1+arg1, [ arg1>=0 && arg2<0 && 1+arg2+arg1>=0 ], cost: 18+12*arg2+12*arg1 26: f3 -> f3 : arg2'=-1-arg1, [ arg1>=0 && arg2<0 && 1+arg2+arg1>=0 ], cost: 12+12*arg2+12*arg1 27: f3 -> f3 : arg1'=arg2+arg1, arg2'=-1-arg2-arg1, [ arg1>=0 && arg2>=0 && arg2+arg1>=0 ], cost: 6+12*arg1 14: __init -> f3 : arg1'=arg1P_1, arg2'=arg2P_2, [], cost: 3 Chained accelerated rules (with incoming rules): Start location: __init 14: __init -> f3 : arg1'=arg1P_1, arg2'=arg2P_2, [], cost: 3 28: __init -> f3 : arg1'=-1, arg2'=1+arg2P_2+arg1P_1, [ arg2P_2>=0 && arg2P_2+arg1P_1>=0 && 1+arg1P_1>=0 ], cost: 15+12*arg1P_1 29: __init -> f3 : arg1'=-1, arg2'=1+arg1P_1, [ arg1P_1>=0 && arg2P_2<0 && 1+arg2P_2+arg1P_1>=0 ], cost: 21+12*arg2P_2+12*arg1P_1 30: __init -> f3 : arg1'=arg1P_1, arg2'=-1-arg1P_1, [ arg1P_1>=0 && arg2P_2<0 && 1+arg2P_2+arg1P_1>=0 ], cost: 15+12*arg2P_2+12*arg1P_1 31: __init -> f3 : arg1'=arg2P_2+arg1P_1, arg2'=-1-arg2P_2-arg1P_1, [ arg1P_1>=0 && arg2P_2>=0 && arg2P_2+arg1P_1>=0 ], cost: 9+12*arg1P_1 Removed unreachable locations (and leaf rules with constant cost): Start location: __init 28: __init -> f3 : arg1'=-1, arg2'=1+arg2P_2+arg1P_1, [ arg2P_2>=0 && arg2P_2+arg1P_1>=0 && 1+arg1P_1>=0 ], cost: 15+12*arg1P_1 29: __init -> f3 : arg1'=-1, arg2'=1+arg1P_1, [ arg1P_1>=0 && arg2P_2<0 && 1+arg2P_2+arg1P_1>=0 ], cost: 21+12*arg2P_2+12*arg1P_1 30: __init -> f3 : arg1'=arg1P_1, arg2'=-1-arg1P_1, [ arg1P_1>=0 && arg2P_2<0 && 1+arg2P_2+arg1P_1>=0 ], cost: 15+12*arg2P_2+12*arg1P_1 31: __init -> f3 : arg1'=arg2P_2+arg1P_1, arg2'=-1-arg2P_2-arg1P_1, [ arg1P_1>=0 && arg2P_2>=0 && arg2P_2+arg1P_1>=0 ], cost: 9+12*arg1P_1 ### Computing asymptotic complexity ### Fully simplified ITS problem Start location: __init 28: __init -> f3 : arg1'=-1, arg2'=1+arg2P_2+arg1P_1, [ arg2P_2>=0 && arg2P_2+arg1P_1>=0 && 1+arg1P_1>=0 ], cost: 15+12*arg1P_1 29: __init -> f3 : arg1'=-1, arg2'=1+arg1P_1, [ arg1P_1>=0 && arg2P_2<0 && 1+arg2P_2+arg1P_1>=0 ], cost: 21+12*arg2P_2+12*arg1P_1 31: __init -> f3 : arg1'=arg2P_2+arg1P_1, arg2'=-1-arg2P_2-arg1P_1, [ arg1P_1>=0 && arg2P_2>=0 && arg2P_2+arg1P_1>=0 ], cost: 9+12*arg1P_1 Computing asymptotic complexity for rule 28 Resulting cost 0 has complexity: Unknown Computing asymptotic complexity for rule 29 Simplified the guard: 29: __init -> f3 : arg1'=-1, arg2'=1+arg1P_1, [ arg2P_2<0 && 1+arg2P_2+arg1P_1>=0 ], cost: 21+12*arg2P_2+12*arg1P_1 Resulting cost 0 has complexity: Unknown Computing asymptotic complexity for rule 31 Resulting cost 0 has complexity: Unknown Obtained the following overall complexity (w.r.t. the length of the input n): Complexity: Constant Cpx degree: 0 Solved cost: 1 Rule cost: 1 Rule guard: [] WORST_CASE(Omega(1),?)