WORST_CASE(Omega(1),?) ### Pre-processing the ITS problem ### Initial linear ITS problem Start location: __init 0: f1 -> f2 : arg1'=arg1P_1, arg2'=arg2P_1, arg3'=arg3P_1, [ arg1==arg1P_1 && arg2==arg2P_1 ], cost: 1 1: f2 -> f3 : arg1'=arg1P_2, arg2'=arg2P_2, arg3'=arg3P_2, [ 0==arg1P_2 && arg2==arg2P_2 && arg3==arg3P_2 ], cost: 1 2: f3 -> f4 : arg1'=arg1P_3, arg2'=arg2P_3, arg3'=arg3P_3, [ arg1==arg1P_3 && 0==arg2P_3 && arg3==arg3P_3 ], cost: 1 5: f4 -> f5 : arg1'=arg1P_6, arg2'=arg2P_6, arg3'=arg3P_6, [ arg1 f8 : arg1'=arg1P_8, arg2'=arg2P_8, arg3'=arg3P_8, [ arg1>=arg3 && arg1==arg1P_8 && arg2==arg2P_8 && arg3==arg3P_8 ], cost: 1 3: f5 -> f6 : arg1'=arg1P_4, arg2'=arg2P_4, arg3'=arg3P_4, [ arg2P_4==arg2+arg1 && arg1==arg1P_4 && arg3==arg3P_4 ], cost: 1 4: f6 -> f7 : arg1'=arg1P_5, arg2'=arg2P_5, arg3'=arg3P_5, [ arg1P_5==1+arg1 && arg2==arg2P_5 && arg3==arg3P_5 ], cost: 1 6: f7 -> f4 : arg1'=arg1P_7, arg2'=arg2P_7, arg3'=arg3P_7, [ arg1==arg1P_7 && arg2==arg2P_7 && arg3==arg3P_7 ], cost: 1 8: __init -> f1 : arg1'=arg1P_9, arg2'=arg2P_9, arg3'=arg3P_9, [], cost: 1 Checking for constant complexity: The following rule is satisfiable with cost >= 1, yielding constant complexity: 8: __init -> f1 : arg1'=arg1P_9, arg2'=arg2P_9, arg3'=arg3P_9, [], cost: 1 Removed unreachable and leaf rules: Start location: __init 0: f1 -> f2 : arg1'=arg1P_1, arg2'=arg2P_1, arg3'=arg3P_1, [ arg1==arg1P_1 && arg2==arg2P_1 ], cost: 1 1: f2 -> f3 : arg1'=arg1P_2, arg2'=arg2P_2, arg3'=arg3P_2, [ 0==arg1P_2 && arg2==arg2P_2 && arg3==arg3P_2 ], cost: 1 2: f3 -> f4 : arg1'=arg1P_3, arg2'=arg2P_3, arg3'=arg3P_3, [ arg1==arg1P_3 && 0==arg2P_3 && arg3==arg3P_3 ], cost: 1 5: f4 -> f5 : arg1'=arg1P_6, arg2'=arg2P_6, arg3'=arg3P_6, [ arg1 f6 : arg1'=arg1P_4, arg2'=arg2P_4, arg3'=arg3P_4, [ arg2P_4==arg2+arg1 && arg1==arg1P_4 && arg3==arg3P_4 ], cost: 1 4: f6 -> f7 : arg1'=arg1P_5, arg2'=arg2P_5, arg3'=arg3P_5, [ arg1P_5==1+arg1 && arg2==arg2P_5 && arg3==arg3P_5 ], cost: 1 6: f7 -> f4 : arg1'=arg1P_7, arg2'=arg2P_7, arg3'=arg3P_7, [ arg1==arg1P_7 && arg2==arg2P_7 && arg3==arg3P_7 ], cost: 1 8: __init -> f1 : arg1'=arg1P_9, arg2'=arg2P_9, arg3'=arg3P_9, [], cost: 1 Simplified all rules, resulting in: Start location: __init 0: f1 -> f2 : arg3'=arg3P_1, [], cost: 1 1: f2 -> f3 : arg1'=0, [], cost: 1 2: f3 -> f4 : arg2'=0, [], cost: 1 5: f4 -> f5 : [ arg1 f6 : arg2'=arg2+arg1, [], cost: 1 4: f6 -> f7 : arg1'=1+arg1, [], cost: 1 6: f7 -> f4 : [], cost: 1 8: __init -> f1 : arg1'=arg1P_9, arg2'=arg2P_9, arg3'=arg3P_9, [], cost: 1 ### Simplification by acceleration and chaining ### Eliminated locations (on linear paths): Start location: __init 14: f4 -> f4 : arg1'=1+arg1, arg2'=arg2+arg1, [ arg1 f4 : arg1'=0, arg2'=0, arg3'=arg3P_1, [], cost: 4 Accelerating simple loops of location 3. Accelerating the following rules: 14: f4 -> f4 : arg1'=1+arg1, arg2'=arg2+arg1, [ arg1 f4 : arg1'=arg3, arg2'=arg2+(arg3-arg1)*arg1-1/2*arg3+1/2*(arg3-arg1)^2+1/2*arg1, [ arg3-arg1>=0 ], cost: 4*arg3-4*arg1 11: __init -> f4 : arg1'=0, arg2'=0, arg3'=arg3P_1, [], cost: 4 Chained accelerated rules (with incoming rules): Start location: __init 11: __init -> f4 : arg1'=0, arg2'=0, arg3'=arg3P_1, [], cost: 4 16: __init -> f4 : arg1'=arg3P_1, arg2'=-1/2*arg3P_1+1/2*arg3P_1^2, arg3'=arg3P_1, [ arg3P_1>=0 ], cost: 4+4*arg3P_1 Removed unreachable locations (and leaf rules with constant cost): Start location: __init 16: __init -> f4 : arg1'=arg3P_1, arg2'=-1/2*arg3P_1+1/2*arg3P_1^2, arg3'=arg3P_1, [ arg3P_1>=0 ], cost: 4+4*arg3P_1 ### Computing asymptotic complexity ### Fully simplified ITS problem Start location: __init 16: __init -> f4 : arg1'=arg3P_1, arg2'=-1/2*arg3P_1+1/2*arg3P_1^2, arg3'=arg3P_1, [ arg3P_1>=0 ], cost: 4+4*arg3P_1 Computing asymptotic complexity for rule 16 Resulting cost 0 has complexity: Unknown Obtained the following overall complexity (w.r.t. the length of the input n): Complexity: Constant Cpx degree: 0 Solved cost: 1 Rule cost: 1 Rule guard: [] WORST_CASE(Omega(1),?)