NO

### Pre-processing the ITS problem ###

Initial linear ITS problem
   Start location: __init
      0: f1_0_main_Load -> f48_0_loop_EQ : arg1'=arg1P_1, arg2'=arg2P_1, [ arg1>0 && arg2>-1 && arg2==arg1P_1 ], cost: 1
      1: f48_0_loop_EQ -> f48_0_loop_EQ : arg1'=arg1P_2, arg2'=arg2P_2, [ arg1>5 && 1+arg1==arg1P_2 ], cost: 1
      2: f48_0_loop_EQ -> f48_0_loop_EQ : arg1'=arg1P_3, arg2'=arg2P_3, [ arg1<6 && arg1>0 && 0==arg1P_3 ], cost: 1
      3: __init -> f1_0_main_Load : arg1'=arg1P_4, arg2'=arg2P_4, [], cost: 1

Checking for constant complexity:
   The following rule is satisfiable with cost >= 1, yielding constant complexity:
      3: __init -> f1_0_main_Load : arg1'=arg1P_4, arg2'=arg2P_4, [], cost: 1

Simplified all rules, resulting in:
   Start location: __init
      0: f1_0_main_Load -> f48_0_loop_EQ : arg1'=arg2, arg2'=arg2P_1, [ arg1>0 && arg2>-1 ], cost: 1
      1: f48_0_loop_EQ -> f48_0_loop_EQ : arg1'=1+arg1, arg2'=arg2P_2, [ arg1>5 ], cost: 1
      2: f48_0_loop_EQ -> f48_0_loop_EQ : arg1'=0, arg2'=arg2P_3, [ arg1<6 && arg1>0 ], cost: 1
      3: __init -> f1_0_main_Load : arg1'=arg1P_4, arg2'=arg2P_4, [], cost: 1

### Simplification by acceleration and chaining ###

Accelerating simple loops of location 1.
   Accelerating the following rules:
      1: f48_0_loop_EQ -> f48_0_loop_EQ : arg1'=1+arg1, arg2'=arg2P_2, [ arg1>5 ], cost: 1
      2: f48_0_loop_EQ -> f48_0_loop_EQ : arg1'=0, arg2'=arg2P_3, [ arg1<6 && arg1>0 ], cost: 1

   Accelerated rule 1 with non-termination, yielding the new rule 4.
   Failed to prove monotonicity of the guard of rule 2.
[accelerate] Nesting with 1 inner and 1 outer candidates
   Removing the simple loops: 1.

Accelerated all simple loops using metering functions (where possible):
   Start location: __init
      0: f1_0_main_Load -> f48_0_loop_EQ : arg1'=arg2, arg2'=arg2P_1, [ arg1>0 && arg2>-1 ], cost: 1
      2: f48_0_loop_EQ -> f48_0_loop_EQ : arg1'=0, arg2'=arg2P_3, [ arg1<6 && arg1>0 ], cost: 1
      4: f48_0_loop_EQ -> [3] : [ arg1>5 ], cost: NONTERM
      3: __init -> f1_0_main_Load : arg1'=arg1P_4, arg2'=arg2P_4, [], cost: 1

Chained accelerated rules (with incoming rules):
   Start location: __init
      0: f1_0_main_Load -> f48_0_loop_EQ : arg1'=arg2, arg2'=arg2P_1, [ arg1>0 && arg2>-1 ], cost: 1
      5: f1_0_main_Load -> f48_0_loop_EQ : arg1'=0, arg2'=arg2P_3, [ arg1>0 && arg2<6 && arg2>0 ], cost: 2
      6: f1_0_main_Load -> [3] : [ arg1>0 && arg2>5 ], cost: NONTERM
      3: __init -> f1_0_main_Load : arg1'=arg1P_4, arg2'=arg2P_4, [], cost: 1

Removed unreachable locations (and leaf rules with constant cost):
   Start location: __init
      6: f1_0_main_Load -> [3] : [ arg1>0 && arg2>5 ], cost: NONTERM
      3: __init -> f1_0_main_Load : arg1'=arg1P_4, arg2'=arg2P_4, [], cost: 1

Eliminated locations (on linear paths):
   Start location: __init
      7: __init -> [3] : [ arg1P_4>0 && arg2P_4>5 ], cost: NONTERM

### Computing asymptotic complexity ###

Fully simplified ITS problem
   Start location: __init
      7: __init -> [3] : [ arg1P_4>0 && arg2P_4>5 ], cost: NONTERM

Computing asymptotic complexity for rule 7
   Guard is satisfiable, yielding nontermination
   Resulting cost NONTERM has complexity: Nonterm

Found new complexity Nonterm.

Obtained the following overall complexity (w.r.t. the length of the input n):
   Complexity:  Nonterm
   Cpx degree:  Nonterm
   Solved cost: NONTERM
   Rule cost:   NONTERM
   Rule guard:  [ arg1P_4>0 && arg2P_4>5 ]

NO