NO

### Pre-processing the ITS problem ###

Initial linear ITS problem
   Start location: __init
      0: f1_0_main_Load -> f53_0_loop_EQ : arg1'=arg1P_1, arg2'=arg2P_1, [ arg1>0 && arg2>-1 && arg2==arg1P_1 ], cost: 1
      1: f53_0_loop_EQ -> f53_0_loop_EQ : arg1'=arg1P_2, arg2'=arg2P_2, [ arg1>35 && 0==arg1P_2 ], cost: 1
      2: f53_0_loop_EQ -> f53_0_loop_EQ : arg1'=arg1P_3, arg2'=arg2P_3, [ arg1<31 && arg1<36 && arg1>0 && -1+arg1==arg1P_3 ], cost: 1
      3: f53_0_loop_EQ -> f53_0_loop_EQ : arg1'=arg1P_4, arg2'=arg2P_4, [ arg1>30 && arg1<36 && 35==arg1P_4 ], cost: 1
      4: __init -> f1_0_main_Load : arg1'=arg1P_5, arg2'=arg2P_5, [], cost: 1

Checking for constant complexity:
   The following rule is satisfiable with cost >= 1, yielding constant complexity:
      4: __init -> f1_0_main_Load : arg1'=arg1P_5, arg2'=arg2P_5, [], cost: 1

Simplified all rules, resulting in:
   Start location: __init
      0: f1_0_main_Load -> f53_0_loop_EQ : arg1'=arg2, arg2'=arg2P_1, [ arg1>0 && arg2>-1 ], cost: 1
      1: f53_0_loop_EQ -> f53_0_loop_EQ : arg1'=0, arg2'=arg2P_2, [ arg1>35 ], cost: 1
      2: f53_0_loop_EQ -> f53_0_loop_EQ : arg1'=-1+arg1, arg2'=arg2P_3, [ arg1<31 && arg1>0 ], cost: 1
      3: f53_0_loop_EQ -> f53_0_loop_EQ : arg1'=35, arg2'=arg2P_4, [ arg1>30 && arg1<36 ], cost: 1
      4: __init -> f1_0_main_Load : arg1'=arg1P_5, arg2'=arg2P_5, [], cost: 1

### Simplification by acceleration and chaining ###

Accelerating simple loops of location 1.
   Accelerating the following rules:
      1: f53_0_loop_EQ -> f53_0_loop_EQ : arg1'=0, arg2'=arg2P_2, [ arg1>35 ], cost: 1
      2: f53_0_loop_EQ -> f53_0_loop_EQ : arg1'=-1+arg1, arg2'=arg2P_3, [ arg1<31 && arg1>0 ], cost: 1
      3: f53_0_loop_EQ -> f53_0_loop_EQ : arg1'=35, arg2'=arg2P_4, [ arg1>30 && arg1<36 ], cost: 1

   Failed to prove monotonicity of the guard of rule 1.
   Accelerated rule 2 with backward acceleration, yielding the new rule 5.
   Accelerated rule 3 with non-termination, yielding the new rule 6.
[accelerate] Nesting with 2 inner and 2 outer candidates
   Removing the simple loops: 2 3.

Accelerated all simple loops using metering functions (where possible):
   Start location: __init
      0: f1_0_main_Load -> f53_0_loop_EQ : arg1'=arg2, arg2'=arg2P_1, [ arg1>0 && arg2>-1 ], cost: 1
      1: f53_0_loop_EQ -> f53_0_loop_EQ : arg1'=0, arg2'=arg2P_2, [ arg1>35 ], cost: 1
      5: f53_0_loop_EQ -> f53_0_loop_EQ : arg1'=0, arg2'=arg2P_3, [ arg1<31 && arg1>=1 ], cost: arg1
      6: f53_0_loop_EQ -> [3] : [ arg1>30 && arg1<36 ], cost: NONTERM
      4: __init -> f1_0_main_Load : arg1'=arg1P_5, arg2'=arg2P_5, [], cost: 1

Chained accelerated rules (with incoming rules):
   Start location: __init
      0: f1_0_main_Load -> f53_0_loop_EQ : arg1'=arg2, arg2'=arg2P_1, [ arg1>0 && arg2>-1 ], cost: 1
      7: f1_0_main_Load -> f53_0_loop_EQ : arg1'=0, arg2'=arg2P_2, [ arg1>0 && arg2>35 ], cost: 2
      8: f1_0_main_Load -> f53_0_loop_EQ : arg1'=0, arg2'=arg2P_3, [ arg1>0 && arg2<31 && arg2>=1 ], cost: 1+arg2
      9: f1_0_main_Load -> [3] : [ arg1>0 && arg2>30 && arg2<36 ], cost: NONTERM
      4: __init -> f1_0_main_Load : arg1'=arg1P_5, arg2'=arg2P_5, [], cost: 1

Removed unreachable locations (and leaf rules with constant cost):
   Start location: __init
      8: f1_0_main_Load -> f53_0_loop_EQ : arg1'=0, arg2'=arg2P_3, [ arg1>0 && arg2<31 && arg2>=1 ], cost: 1+arg2
      9: f1_0_main_Load -> [3] : [ arg1>0 && arg2>30 && arg2<36 ], cost: NONTERM
      4: __init -> f1_0_main_Load : arg1'=arg1P_5, arg2'=arg2P_5, [], cost: 1

Eliminated locations (on tree-shaped paths):
   Start location: __init
     10: __init -> f53_0_loop_EQ : arg1'=0, arg2'=arg2P_3, [ arg1P_5>0 && arg2P_5<31 && arg2P_5>=1 ], cost: 2+arg2P_5
     11: __init -> [3] : [ arg1P_5>0 && arg2P_5>30 && arg2P_5<36 ], cost: NONTERM

### Computing asymptotic complexity ###

Fully simplified ITS problem
   Start location: __init
     10: __init -> f53_0_loop_EQ : arg1'=0, arg2'=arg2P_3, [ arg1P_5>0 && arg2P_5<31 && arg2P_5>=1 ], cost: 2+arg2P_5
     11: __init -> [3] : [ arg1P_5>0 && arg2P_5>30 && arg2P_5<36 ], cost: NONTERM

Computing asymptotic complexity for rule 11
   Guard is satisfiable, yielding nontermination
   Resulting cost NONTERM has complexity: Nonterm

Found new complexity Nonterm.

Obtained the following overall complexity (w.r.t. the length of the input n):
   Complexity:  Nonterm
   Cpx degree:  Nonterm
   Solved cost: NONTERM
   Rule cost:   NONTERM
   Rule guard:  [ arg1P_5>0 && arg2P_5>30 && arg2P_5<36 ]

NO