NO

### Pre-processing the ITS problem ###

Initial linear ITS problem
   Start location: __init
      0: f1_0_main_ConstantStackPush -> f39_0_main_GE : arg1'=arg1P_1, [ 0==arg1P_1 ], cost: 1
      1: f39_0_main_GE -> f39_0_main_GE : arg1'=arg1P_2, [ 0==arg1 && 1==arg1P_2 ], cost: 1
      2: f39_0_main_GE -> f39_0_main_GE : arg1'=arg1P_3, [ 1==arg1 && 0==arg1P_3 ], cost: 1
      3: __init -> f1_0_main_ConstantStackPush : arg1'=arg1P_4, [], cost: 1

Checking for constant complexity:
   The following rule is satisfiable with cost >= 1, yielding constant complexity:
      3: __init -> f1_0_main_ConstantStackPush : arg1'=arg1P_4, [], cost: 1

Simplified all rules, resulting in:
   Start location: __init
      0: f1_0_main_ConstantStackPush -> f39_0_main_GE : arg1'=0, [], cost: 1
      1: f39_0_main_GE -> f39_0_main_GE : arg1'=1, [ 0==arg1 ], cost: 1
      2: f39_0_main_GE -> f39_0_main_GE : arg1'=0, [ 1==arg1 ], cost: 1
      3: __init -> f1_0_main_ConstantStackPush : arg1'=arg1P_4, [], cost: 1

### Simplification by acceleration and chaining ###

Accelerating simple loops of location 1.
   Accelerating the following rules:
      1: f39_0_main_GE -> f39_0_main_GE : arg1'=1, [ 0==arg1 ], cost: 1
      2: f39_0_main_GE -> f39_0_main_GE : arg1'=0, [ 1==arg1 ], cost: 1

   Failed to prove monotonicity of the guard of rule 1.
   Failed to prove monotonicity of the guard of rule 2.
[accelerate] Nesting with 2 inner and 2 outer candidates
   Nested simple loops 2 (outer loop) and 1 (inner loop) with Rule(1 | 0==arg1, | NONTERM || 3 | ), resulting in the new rules: 4, 5.
   Nested simple loops 1 (outer loop) and 2 (inner loop) with Rule(1 | 1==arg1, | NONTERM || 3 | ), resulting in the new rules: 6, 7.
   Removing the simple loops: 1 2.
   Also removing duplicate rules: 4 5.

Accelerated all simple loops using metering functions (where possible):
   Start location: __init
      0: f1_0_main_ConstantStackPush -> f39_0_main_GE : arg1'=0, [], cost: 1
      6: f39_0_main_GE -> [3] : [ 1==arg1 ], cost: NONTERM
      7: f39_0_main_GE -> [3] : [ 0==arg1 ], cost: NONTERM
      3: __init -> f1_0_main_ConstantStackPush : arg1'=arg1P_4, [], cost: 1

Chained accelerated rules (with incoming rules):
   Start location: __init
      0: f1_0_main_ConstantStackPush -> f39_0_main_GE : arg1'=0, [], cost: 1
      8: f1_0_main_ConstantStackPush -> [3] : [], cost: NONTERM
      3: __init -> f1_0_main_ConstantStackPush : arg1'=arg1P_4, [], cost: 1

Removed unreachable locations (and leaf rules with constant cost):
   Start location: __init
      8: f1_0_main_ConstantStackPush -> [3] : [], cost: NONTERM
      3: __init -> f1_0_main_ConstantStackPush : arg1'=arg1P_4, [], cost: 1

Eliminated locations (on linear paths):
   Start location: __init
      9: __init -> [3] : [], cost: NONTERM

### Computing asymptotic complexity ###

Fully simplified ITS problem
   Start location: __init
      9: __init -> [3] : [], cost: NONTERM

Computing asymptotic complexity for rule 9
   Guard is satisfiable, yielding nontermination
   Resulting cost NONTERM has complexity: Nonterm

Found new complexity Nonterm.

Obtained the following overall complexity (w.r.t. the length of the input n):
   Complexity:  Nonterm
   Cpx degree:  Nonterm
   Solved cost: NONTERM
   Rule cost:   NONTERM
   Rule guard:  []

NO