WORST_CASE(Omega(1),?)

### Pre-processing the ITS problem ###

Initial linear ITS problem
   Start location: __init
      0: f1_0_main_New -> f169_0_exampleMethods_LE : arg1'=arg1P_1, arg2'=arg2P_1, arg3'=arg3P_1, [ arg1P_1>13 && 0==arg2P_1 && 10==arg3P_1 ], cost: 1
      1: f169_0_exampleMethods_LE -> f169_0_exampleMethods_LE : arg1'=arg1P_2, arg2'=arg2P_2, arg3'=arg3P_2, [ arg2>-1 && arg3>0 && arg1P_2<=arg1 && arg1>2 && arg1P_2>2 && 4+arg3<=arg1 && 10+arg2==arg2P_2 && -1+arg3==arg3P_2 ], cost: 1
      2: __init -> f1_0_main_New : arg1'=arg1P_3, arg2'=arg2P_3, arg3'=arg3P_3, [], cost: 1

Checking for constant complexity:
   The following rule is satisfiable with cost >= 1, yielding constant complexity:
      2: __init -> f1_0_main_New : arg1'=arg1P_3, arg2'=arg2P_3, arg3'=arg3P_3, [], cost: 1

Simplified all rules, resulting in:
   Start location: __init
      0: f1_0_main_New -> f169_0_exampleMethods_LE : arg1'=arg1P_1, arg2'=0, arg3'=10, [ arg1P_1>13 ], cost: 1
      1: f169_0_exampleMethods_LE -> f169_0_exampleMethods_LE : arg1'=arg1P_2, arg2'=10+arg2, arg3'=-1+arg3, [ arg2>-1 && arg3>0 && arg1P_2<=arg1 && arg1>2 && arg1P_2>2 && 4+arg3<=arg1 ], cost: 1
      2: __init -> f1_0_main_New : arg1'=arg1P_3, arg2'=arg2P_3, arg3'=arg3P_3, [], cost: 1

### Simplification by acceleration and chaining ###

Accelerating simple loops of location 1.
   Accelerating the following rules:
      1: f169_0_exampleMethods_LE -> f169_0_exampleMethods_LE : arg1'=arg1P_2, arg2'=10+arg2, arg3'=-1+arg3, [ arg2>-1 && arg3>0 && arg1P_2<=arg1 && arg1>2 && arg1P_2>2 && 4+arg3<=arg1 ], cost: 1

   Failed to prove monotonicity of the guard of rule 1.
[accelerate] Nesting with 1 inner and 1 outer candidates

Accelerated all simple loops using metering functions (where possible):
   Start location: __init
      0: f1_0_main_New -> f169_0_exampleMethods_LE : arg1'=arg1P_1, arg2'=0, arg3'=10, [ arg1P_1>13 ], cost: 1
      1: f169_0_exampleMethods_LE -> f169_0_exampleMethods_LE : arg1'=arg1P_2, arg2'=10+arg2, arg3'=-1+arg3, [ arg2>-1 && arg3>0 && arg1P_2<=arg1 && arg1>2 && arg1P_2>2 && 4+arg3<=arg1 ], cost: 1
      2: __init -> f1_0_main_New : arg1'=arg1P_3, arg2'=arg2P_3, arg3'=arg3P_3, [], cost: 1

Chained accelerated rules (with incoming rules):
   Start location: __init
      0: f1_0_main_New -> f169_0_exampleMethods_LE : arg1'=arg1P_1, arg2'=0, arg3'=10, [ arg1P_1>13 ], cost: 1
      3: f1_0_main_New -> f169_0_exampleMethods_LE : arg1'=arg1P_2, arg2'=10, arg3'=9, [ arg1P_2>2 ], cost: 2
      2: __init -> f1_0_main_New : arg1'=arg1P_3, arg2'=arg2P_3, arg3'=arg3P_3, [], cost: 1

Removed unreachable locations (and leaf rules with constant cost):
   Start location: __init
     <empty>

### Computing asymptotic complexity ###

Fully simplified ITS problem
   Start location: __init
     <empty>

Obtained the following overall complexity (w.r.t. the length of the input n):
   Complexity:  Constant
   Cpx degree:  0
   Solved cost: 1
   Rule cost:   1
   Rule guard:  []

WORST_CASE(Omega(1),?)