NO ### Pre-processing the ITS problem ### Initial linear ITS problem Start location: __init 0: f1_0_main_Load -> f162_0_main_LT : arg1'=arg1P_1, arg2'=arg2P_1, [ arg2P_1>-1 && arg2>1 && arg1P_1>-1 && arg1>0 ], cost: 1 1: f162_0_main_LT -> f162_0_main_LT : arg1'=arg1P_2, arg2'=arg2P_2, [ arg1>-1 && arg2>-1 && arg2<=arg1 && -arg2+arg1>0 && -1+arg1==arg1P_2 && arg2==arg2P_2 ], cost: 1 2: f162_0_main_LT -> f162_0_main_LT : arg1'=arg1P_3, arg2'=arg2P_3, [ arg1>-1 && arg2>-1 && arg2<=arg1 && -arg2+arg1==0 && 2*arg1>=0 && 1+2*arg1==arg1P_3 && 1+arg2==arg2P_3 ], cost: 1 3: __init -> f1_0_main_Load : arg1'=arg1P_4, arg2'=arg2P_4, [], cost: 1 Checking for constant complexity: The following rule is satisfiable with cost >= 1, yielding constant complexity: 3: __init -> f1_0_main_Load : arg1'=arg1P_4, arg2'=arg2P_4, [], cost: 1 Simplified all rules, resulting in: Start location: __init 0: f1_0_main_Load -> f162_0_main_LT : arg1'=arg1P_1, arg2'=arg2P_1, [ arg2P_1>-1 && arg2>1 && arg1P_1>-1 && arg1>0 ], cost: 1 1: f162_0_main_LT -> f162_0_main_LT : arg1'=-1+arg1, [ arg2>-1 && -arg2+arg1>0 ], cost: 1 2: f162_0_main_LT -> f162_0_main_LT : arg1'=1+2*arg1, arg2'=1+arg2, [ arg2>-1 && -arg2+arg1==0 ], cost: 1 3: __init -> f1_0_main_Load : arg1'=arg1P_4, arg2'=arg2P_4, [], cost: 1 ### Simplification by acceleration and chaining ### Accelerating simple loops of location 1. Accelerating the following rules: 1: f162_0_main_LT -> f162_0_main_LT : arg1'=-1+arg1, [ arg2>-1 && -arg2+arg1>0 ], cost: 1 2: f162_0_main_LT -> f162_0_main_LT : arg1'=1+2*arg1, arg2'=1+arg2, [ arg2>-1 && -arg2+arg1==0 ], cost: 1 Accelerated rule 1 with backward acceleration, yielding the new rule 4. Failed to prove monotonicity of the guard of rule 2. [accelerate] Nesting with 2 inner and 2 outer candidates Nested simple loops 2 (outer loop) and 4 (inner loop) with Rule(1 | arg2>-1, -arg2+arg1>=0, | NONTERM || 3 | ), resulting in the new rules: 5, 6. Removing the simple loops: 1 2. Accelerated all simple loops using metering functions (where possible): Start location: __init 0: f1_0_main_Load -> f162_0_main_LT : arg1'=arg1P_1, arg2'=arg2P_1, [ arg2P_1>-1 && arg2>1 && arg1P_1>-1 && arg1>0 ], cost: 1 4: f162_0_main_LT -> f162_0_main_LT : arg1'=arg2, [ arg2>-1 && -arg2+arg1>=0 ], cost: -arg2+arg1 5: f162_0_main_LT -> [3] : [ arg2>-1 && -arg2+arg1>=0 ], cost: NONTERM 6: f162_0_main_LT -> [3] : [ arg2>-1 && -arg2+arg1==0 && -arg2+2*arg1>=0 ], cost: NONTERM 3: __init -> f1_0_main_Load : arg1'=arg1P_4, arg2'=arg2P_4, [], cost: 1 Chained accelerated rules (with incoming rules): Start location: __init 0: f1_0_main_Load -> f162_0_main_LT : arg1'=arg1P_1, arg2'=arg2P_1, [ arg2P_1>-1 && arg2>1 && arg1P_1>-1 && arg1>0 ], cost: 1 7: f1_0_main_Load -> f162_0_main_LT : arg1'=arg2P_1, arg2'=arg2P_1, [ arg2P_1>-1 && arg2>1 && arg1P_1>-1 && arg1>0 && arg1P_1-arg2P_1>=0 ], cost: 1+arg1P_1-arg2P_1 8: f1_0_main_Load -> [3] : [ arg2>1 && arg1>0 ], cost: NONTERM 9: f1_0_main_Load -> [3] : [ arg2>1 && arg1>0 ], cost: NONTERM 3: __init -> f1_0_main_Load : arg1'=arg1P_4, arg2'=arg2P_4, [], cost: 1 Removed unreachable locations (and leaf rules with constant cost): Start location: __init 7: f1_0_main_Load -> f162_0_main_LT : arg1'=arg2P_1, arg2'=arg2P_1, [ arg2P_1>-1 && arg2>1 && arg1P_1>-1 && arg1>0 && arg1P_1-arg2P_1>=0 ], cost: 1+arg1P_1-arg2P_1 8: f1_0_main_Load -> [3] : [ arg2>1 && arg1>0 ], cost: NONTERM 9: f1_0_main_Load -> [3] : [ arg2>1 && arg1>0 ], cost: NONTERM 3: __init -> f1_0_main_Load : arg1'=arg1P_4, arg2'=arg2P_4, [], cost: 1 Eliminated locations (on tree-shaped paths): Start location: __init 10: __init -> f162_0_main_LT : arg1'=arg2P_1, arg2'=arg2P_1, [ arg2P_1>-1 && arg2P_4>1 && arg1P_1>-1 && arg1P_4>0 && arg1P_1-arg2P_1>=0 ], cost: 2+arg1P_1-arg2P_1 11: __init -> [3] : [ arg2P_4>1 && arg1P_4>0 ], cost: NONTERM 12: __init -> [3] : [ arg2P_4>1 && arg1P_4>0 ], cost: NONTERM ### Computing asymptotic complexity ### Fully simplified ITS problem Start location: __init 10: __init -> f162_0_main_LT : arg1'=arg2P_1, arg2'=arg2P_1, [ arg2P_1>-1 && arg2P_4>1 && arg1P_1>-1 && arg1P_4>0 && arg1P_1-arg2P_1>=0 ], cost: 2+arg1P_1-arg2P_1 12: __init -> [3] : [ arg2P_4>1 && arg1P_4>0 ], cost: NONTERM Computing asymptotic complexity for rule 12 Guard is satisfiable, yielding nontermination Resulting cost NONTERM has complexity: Nonterm Found new complexity Nonterm. Obtained the following overall complexity (w.r.t. the length of the input n): Complexity: Nonterm Cpx degree: Nonterm Solved cost: NONTERM Rule cost: NONTERM Rule guard: [ arg2P_4>1 && arg1P_4>0 ] NO