NO

### Pre-processing the ITS problem ###

Initial linear ITS problem
   Start location: __init
      0: f1_0_main_Load -> f1_0_main_Load\' : arg1'=arg1P_1, arg2'=arg2P_1, [ x7_1>-1 && arg2>1 && x8_1-2*x9_1==0 && x8_1>-1 && arg1>0 && arg1==arg1P_1 && arg2==arg2P_1 ], cost: 1
      1: f1_0_main_Load\' -> f128_0_loop_GE : arg1'=arg1P_2, arg2'=arg2P_2, [ x12_1>-1 && arg2>1 && x13_1-2*x14_1==0 && x13_1>-1 && arg1>0 && x13_1-2*x14_1<2 && x13_1-2*x14_1>=0 && -x12_1==arg1P_2 ], cost: 1
      2: f128_0_loop_GE -> f128_0_loop_GE : arg1'=arg1P_3, arg2'=arg2P_3, [ arg1<0 && -1+arg1==arg1P_3 ], cost: 1
      3: __init -> f1_0_main_Load : arg1'=arg1P_4, arg2'=arg2P_4, [], cost: 1

Checking for constant complexity:
   The following rule is satisfiable with cost >= 1, yielding constant complexity:
      3: __init -> f1_0_main_Load : arg1'=arg1P_4, arg2'=arg2P_4, [], cost: 1

Simplified all rules, resulting in:
   Start location: __init
      0: f1_0_main_Load -> f1_0_main_Load\' : [ arg2>1 && 2*x9_1>-1 && arg1>0 ], cost: 1
      1: f1_0_main_Load\' -> f128_0_loop_GE : arg1'=-x12_1, arg2'=arg2P_2, [ x12_1>-1 && arg2>1 && 2*x14_1>-1 && arg1>0 ], cost: 1
      2: f128_0_loop_GE -> f128_0_loop_GE : arg1'=-1+arg1, arg2'=arg2P_3, [ arg1<0 ], cost: 1
      3: __init -> f1_0_main_Load : arg1'=arg1P_4, arg2'=arg2P_4, [], cost: 1

### Simplification by acceleration and chaining ###

Accelerating simple loops of location 2.
   Accelerating the following rules:
      2: f128_0_loop_GE -> f128_0_loop_GE : arg1'=-1+arg1, arg2'=arg2P_3, [ arg1<0 ], cost: 1

   Accelerated rule 2 with non-termination, yielding the new rule 4.
[accelerate] Nesting with 0 inner and 0 outer candidates
   Removing the simple loops: 2.

Accelerated all simple loops using metering functions (where possible):
   Start location: __init
      0: f1_0_main_Load -> f1_0_main_Load\' : [ arg2>1 && 2*x9_1>-1 && arg1>0 ], cost: 1
      1: f1_0_main_Load\' -> f128_0_loop_GE : arg1'=-x12_1, arg2'=arg2P_2, [ x12_1>-1 && arg2>1 && 2*x14_1>-1 && arg1>0 ], cost: 1
      4: f128_0_loop_GE -> [4] : [ arg1<0 ], cost: NONTERM
      3: __init -> f1_0_main_Load : arg1'=arg1P_4, arg2'=arg2P_4, [], cost: 1

Chained accelerated rules (with incoming rules):
   Start location: __init
      0: f1_0_main_Load -> f1_0_main_Load\' : [ arg2>1 && 2*x9_1>-1 && arg1>0 ], cost: 1
      1: f1_0_main_Load\' -> f128_0_loop_GE : arg1'=-x12_1, arg2'=arg2P_2, [ x12_1>-1 && arg2>1 && 2*x14_1>-1 && arg1>0 ], cost: 1
      5: f1_0_main_Load\' -> [4] : [ arg2>1 && 2*x14_1>-1 && arg1>0 ], cost: NONTERM
      3: __init -> f1_0_main_Load : arg1'=arg1P_4, arg2'=arg2P_4, [], cost: 1

Removed unreachable locations (and leaf rules with constant cost):
   Start location: __init
      0: f1_0_main_Load -> f1_0_main_Load\' : [ arg2>1 && 2*x9_1>-1 && arg1>0 ], cost: 1
      5: f1_0_main_Load\' -> [4] : [ arg2>1 && 2*x14_1>-1 && arg1>0 ], cost: NONTERM
      3: __init -> f1_0_main_Load : arg1'=arg1P_4, arg2'=arg2P_4, [], cost: 1

Eliminated locations (on linear paths):
   Start location: __init
      7: __init -> [4] : [ arg2P_4>1 && 2*x9_1>-1 && arg1P_4>0 && 2*x14_1>-1 ], cost: NONTERM

### Computing asymptotic complexity ###

Fully simplified ITS problem
   Start location: __init
      7: __init -> [4] : [ arg2P_4>1 && 2*x9_1>-1 && arg1P_4>0 && 2*x14_1>-1 ], cost: NONTERM

Computing asymptotic complexity for rule 7
   Guard is satisfiable, yielding nontermination
   Resulting cost NONTERM has complexity: Nonterm

Found new complexity Nonterm.

Obtained the following overall complexity (w.r.t. the length of the input n):
   Complexity:  Nonterm
   Cpx degree:  Nonterm
   Solved cost: NONTERM
   Rule cost:   NONTERM
   Rule guard:  [ arg2P_4>1 && 2*x9_1>-1 && arg1P_4>0 && 2*x14_1>-1 ]

NO