WORST_CASE(Omega(1),?)

### Pre-processing the ITS problem ###

Initial linear ITS problem
   Start location: __init
      0: f1_0_main_Load -> f152_0_createList_LE : arg1'=arg1P_1, arg2'=arg2P_1, [ arg2>0 && x3_1>-1 && 1+arg1P_1<=arg1 && arg1>0 && arg1P_1>-1 && -1+x3_1==arg2P_1 ], cost: 1
      1: f152_0_createList_LE -> f196_0_reverse_NULL : arg1'=arg1P_2, arg2'=arg2P_2, [ arg1P_2<=arg1 && arg2<1 && arg1>-1 && arg1P_2>-1 ], cost: 1
      2: f152_0_createList_LE -> f152_0_createList_LE : arg1'=arg1P_3, arg2'=arg2P_3, [ -2+arg1P_3<=arg1 && arg2>0 && arg1>-1 && arg1P_3>0 && -1+arg2==arg2P_3 ], cost: 1
      3: f196_0_reverse_NULL -> f196_0_reverse_NULL : arg1'=arg1P_4, arg2'=arg2P_4, [ 1+arg1P_4<=arg1 && arg1>0 && arg1P_4>-1 ], cost: 1
      4: __init -> f1_0_main_Load : arg1'=arg1P_5, arg2'=arg2P_5, [], cost: 1

Checking for constant complexity:
   The following rule is satisfiable with cost >= 1, yielding constant complexity:
      4: __init -> f1_0_main_Load : arg1'=arg1P_5, arg2'=arg2P_5, [], cost: 1

Simplified all rules, resulting in:
   Start location: __init
      0: f1_0_main_Load -> f152_0_createList_LE : arg1'=arg1P_1, arg2'=-1+x3_1, [ arg2>0 && x3_1>-1 && 1+arg1P_1<=arg1 && arg1>0 && arg1P_1>-1 ], cost: 1
      1: f152_0_createList_LE -> f196_0_reverse_NULL : arg1'=arg1P_2, arg2'=arg2P_2, [ arg1P_2<=arg1 && arg2<1 && arg1>-1 && arg1P_2>-1 ], cost: 1
      2: f152_0_createList_LE -> f152_0_createList_LE : arg1'=arg1P_3, arg2'=-1+arg2, [ -2+arg1P_3<=arg1 && arg2>0 && arg1>-1 && arg1P_3>0 ], cost: 1
      3: f196_0_reverse_NULL -> f196_0_reverse_NULL : arg1'=arg1P_4, arg2'=arg2P_4, [ 1+arg1P_4<=arg1 && arg1>0 && arg1P_4>-1 ], cost: 1
      4: __init -> f1_0_main_Load : arg1'=arg1P_5, arg2'=arg2P_5, [], cost: 1

### Simplification by acceleration and chaining ###

Accelerating simple loops of location 1.
   Accelerating the following rules:
      2: f152_0_createList_LE -> f152_0_createList_LE : arg1'=arg1P_3, arg2'=-1+arg2, [ -2+arg1P_3<=arg1 && arg2>0 && arg1>-1 && arg1P_3>0 ], cost: 1

   Accelerated rule 2 with backward acceleration, yielding the new rule 5.
[accelerate] Nesting with 1 inner and 1 outer candidates
   Removing the simple loops: 2.

Accelerating simple loops of location 2.
   Accelerating the following rules:
      3: f196_0_reverse_NULL -> f196_0_reverse_NULL : arg1'=arg1P_4, arg2'=arg2P_4, [ 1+arg1P_4<=arg1 && arg1>0 && arg1P_4>-1 ], cost: 1

   Failed to prove monotonicity of the guard of rule 3.
[accelerate] Nesting with 1 inner and 1 outer candidates

Accelerated all simple loops using metering functions (where possible):
   Start location: __init
      0: f1_0_main_Load -> f152_0_createList_LE : arg1'=arg1P_1, arg2'=-1+x3_1, [ arg2>0 && x3_1>-1 && 1+arg1P_1<=arg1 && arg1>0 && arg1P_1>-1 ], cost: 1
      1: f152_0_createList_LE -> f196_0_reverse_NULL : arg1'=arg1P_2, arg2'=arg2P_2, [ arg1P_2<=arg1 && arg2<1 && arg1>-1 && arg1P_2>-1 ], cost: 1
      5: f152_0_createList_LE -> f152_0_createList_LE : arg1'=arg1P_3, arg2'=0, [ -2+arg1P_3<=arg1 && arg1>-1 && arg1P_3>0 && arg2>=1 ], cost: arg2
      3: f196_0_reverse_NULL -> f196_0_reverse_NULL : arg1'=arg1P_4, arg2'=arg2P_4, [ 1+arg1P_4<=arg1 && arg1>0 && arg1P_4>-1 ], cost: 1
      4: __init -> f1_0_main_Load : arg1'=arg1P_5, arg2'=arg2P_5, [], cost: 1

Chained accelerated rules (with incoming rules):
   Start location: __init
      0: f1_0_main_Load -> f152_0_createList_LE : arg1'=arg1P_1, arg2'=-1+x3_1, [ arg2>0 && x3_1>-1 && 1+arg1P_1<=arg1 && arg1>0 && arg1P_1>-1 ], cost: 1
      6: f1_0_main_Load -> f152_0_createList_LE : arg1'=arg1P_3, arg2'=0, [ arg2>0 && arg1>0 && arg1P_3>0 && -1+x3_1>=1 && -2+arg1P_3<=-1+arg1 ], cost: x3_1
      1: f152_0_createList_LE -> f196_0_reverse_NULL : arg1'=arg1P_2, arg2'=arg2P_2, [ arg1P_2<=arg1 && arg2<1 && arg1>-1 && arg1P_2>-1 ], cost: 1
      7: f152_0_createList_LE -> f196_0_reverse_NULL : arg1'=arg1P_4, arg2'=arg2P_4, [ arg2<1 && arg1P_4>-1 && 1+arg1P_4<=arg1 && 1<=arg1 ], cost: 2
      4: __init -> f1_0_main_Load : arg1'=arg1P_5, arg2'=arg2P_5, [], cost: 1

Removed unreachable locations (and leaf rules with constant cost):
   Start location: __init
      6: f1_0_main_Load -> f152_0_createList_LE : arg1'=arg1P_3, arg2'=0, [ arg2>0 && arg1>0 && arg1P_3>0 && -1+x3_1>=1 && -2+arg1P_3<=-1+arg1 ], cost: x3_1
      4: __init -> f1_0_main_Load : arg1'=arg1P_5, arg2'=arg2P_5, [], cost: 1

Eliminated locations (on linear paths):
   Start location: __init
      8: __init -> f152_0_createList_LE : arg1'=arg1P_3, arg2'=0, [ arg2P_5>0 && arg1P_5>0 && arg1P_3>0 && -1+x3_1>=1 && -2+arg1P_3<=-1+arg1P_5 ], cost: 1+x3_1

### Computing asymptotic complexity ###

Fully simplified ITS problem
   Start location: __init
      8: __init -> f152_0_createList_LE : arg1'=arg1P_3, arg2'=0, [ arg2P_5>0 && arg1P_5>0 && arg1P_3>0 && -1+x3_1>=1 && -2+arg1P_3<=-1+arg1P_5 ], cost: 1+x3_1

Computing asymptotic complexity for rule 8
   Resulting cost 0 has complexity: Unknown

Obtained the following overall complexity (w.r.t. the length of the input n):
   Complexity:  Constant
   Cpx degree:  0
   Solved cost: 1
   Rule cost:   1
   Rule guard:  []

WORST_CASE(Omega(1),?)