WORST_CASE(Omega(1),?) ### Pre-processing the ITS problem ### Initial linear ITS problem Start location: __init 0: f1_0_main_Load -> f66_0_nest_NE : arg1'=arg1P_1, arg2'=arg2P_1, [ arg1P_1>-1 && arg2>0 && arg1>0 ], cost: 1 1: f66_0_nest_NE -> f66_0_nest_NE : arg1'=arg1P_2, arg2'=arg2P_2, [ arg1>0 && -1+arg1 f115_0_nest_InvokeMethod : arg1'=arg1P_3, arg2'=arg2P_3, [ 1==arg1 && 1==arg1P_3 ], cost: 1 4: f66_0_nest_NE -> f115_0_nest_InvokeMethod : arg1'=arg1P_5, arg2'=arg2P_5, [ arg1>0 && -1+arg1 f66_0_nest_NE : arg1'=arg1P_4, arg2'=arg2P_4, [ arg1>0 && 0==arg1P_4 ], cost: 1 5: __init -> f1_0_main_Load : arg1'=arg1P_6, arg2'=arg2P_6, [], cost: 1 Checking for constant complexity: The following rule is satisfiable with cost >= 1, yielding constant complexity: 5: __init -> f1_0_main_Load : arg1'=arg1P_6, arg2'=arg2P_6, [], cost: 1 Simplified all rules, resulting in: Start location: __init 0: f1_0_main_Load -> f66_0_nest_NE : arg1'=arg1P_1, arg2'=arg2P_1, [ arg1P_1>-1 && arg2>0 && arg1>0 ], cost: 1 1: f66_0_nest_NE -> f66_0_nest_NE : arg1'=-1+arg1, arg2'=arg2P_2, [ arg1>0 ], cost: 1 2: f66_0_nest_NE -> f115_0_nest_InvokeMethod : arg1'=1, arg2'=arg2P_3, [ 1==arg1 ], cost: 1 4: f66_0_nest_NE -> f115_0_nest_InvokeMethod : arg2'=arg2P_5, [ arg1>0 ], cost: 1 3: f115_0_nest_InvokeMethod -> f66_0_nest_NE : arg1'=0, arg2'=arg2P_4, [ arg1>0 ], cost: 1 5: __init -> f1_0_main_Load : arg1'=arg1P_6, arg2'=arg2P_6, [], cost: 1 ### Simplification by acceleration and chaining ### Accelerating simple loops of location 1. Accelerating the following rules: 1: f66_0_nest_NE -> f66_0_nest_NE : arg1'=-1+arg1, arg2'=arg2P_2, [ arg1>0 ], cost: 1 Accelerated rule 1 with backward acceleration, yielding the new rule 6. [accelerate] Nesting with 1 inner and 1 outer candidates Removing the simple loops: 1. Accelerated all simple loops using metering functions (where possible): Start location: __init 0: f1_0_main_Load -> f66_0_nest_NE : arg1'=arg1P_1, arg2'=arg2P_1, [ arg1P_1>-1 && arg2>0 && arg1>0 ], cost: 1 2: f66_0_nest_NE -> f115_0_nest_InvokeMethod : arg1'=1, arg2'=arg2P_3, [ 1==arg1 ], cost: 1 4: f66_0_nest_NE -> f115_0_nest_InvokeMethod : arg2'=arg2P_5, [ arg1>0 ], cost: 1 6: f66_0_nest_NE -> f66_0_nest_NE : arg1'=0, arg2'=arg2P_2, [ arg1>=1 ], cost: arg1 3: f115_0_nest_InvokeMethod -> f66_0_nest_NE : arg1'=0, arg2'=arg2P_4, [ arg1>0 ], cost: 1 5: __init -> f1_0_main_Load : arg1'=arg1P_6, arg2'=arg2P_6, [], cost: 1 Chained accelerated rules (with incoming rules): Start location: __init 0: f1_0_main_Load -> f66_0_nest_NE : arg1'=arg1P_1, arg2'=arg2P_1, [ arg1P_1>-1 && arg2>0 && arg1>0 ], cost: 1 7: f1_0_main_Load -> f66_0_nest_NE : arg1'=0, arg2'=arg2P_2, [ arg2>0 && arg1>0 && arg1P_1>=1 ], cost: 1+arg1P_1 2: f66_0_nest_NE -> f115_0_nest_InvokeMethod : arg1'=1, arg2'=arg2P_3, [ 1==arg1 ], cost: 1 4: f66_0_nest_NE -> f115_0_nest_InvokeMethod : arg2'=arg2P_5, [ arg1>0 ], cost: 1 3: f115_0_nest_InvokeMethod -> f66_0_nest_NE : arg1'=0, arg2'=arg2P_4, [ arg1>0 ], cost: 1 5: __init -> f1_0_main_Load : arg1'=arg1P_6, arg2'=arg2P_6, [], cost: 1 Eliminated locations (on tree-shaped paths): Start location: __init 10: f66_0_nest_NE -> f66_0_nest_NE : arg1'=0, arg2'=arg2P_4, [ 1==arg1 ], cost: 2 11: f66_0_nest_NE -> f66_0_nest_NE : arg1'=0, arg2'=arg2P_4, [ arg1>0 ], cost: 2 8: __init -> f66_0_nest_NE : arg1'=arg1P_1, arg2'=arg2P_1, [ arg1P_1>-1 && arg2P_6>0 && arg1P_6>0 ], cost: 2 9: __init -> f66_0_nest_NE : arg1'=0, arg2'=arg2P_2, [ arg2P_6>0 && arg1P_6>0 && arg1P_1>=1 ], cost: 2+arg1P_1 Accelerating simple loops of location 1. Accelerating the following rules: 10: f66_0_nest_NE -> f66_0_nest_NE : arg1'=0, arg2'=arg2P_4, [ 1==arg1 ], cost: 2 11: f66_0_nest_NE -> f66_0_nest_NE : arg1'=0, arg2'=arg2P_4, [ arg1>0 ], cost: 2 Failed to prove monotonicity of the guard of rule 10. Failed to prove monotonicity of the guard of rule 11. [accelerate] Nesting with 2 inner and 2 outer candidates Accelerated all simple loops using metering functions (where possible): Start location: __init 10: f66_0_nest_NE -> f66_0_nest_NE : arg1'=0, arg2'=arg2P_4, [ 1==arg1 ], cost: 2 11: f66_0_nest_NE -> f66_0_nest_NE : arg1'=0, arg2'=arg2P_4, [ arg1>0 ], cost: 2 8: __init -> f66_0_nest_NE : arg1'=arg1P_1, arg2'=arg2P_1, [ arg1P_1>-1 && arg2P_6>0 && arg1P_6>0 ], cost: 2 9: __init -> f66_0_nest_NE : arg1'=0, arg2'=arg2P_2, [ arg2P_6>0 && arg1P_6>0 && arg1P_1>=1 ], cost: 2+arg1P_1 Chained accelerated rules (with incoming rules): Start location: __init 8: __init -> f66_0_nest_NE : arg1'=arg1P_1, arg2'=arg2P_1, [ arg1P_1>-1 && arg2P_6>0 && arg1P_6>0 ], cost: 2 9: __init -> f66_0_nest_NE : arg1'=0, arg2'=arg2P_2, [ arg2P_6>0 && arg1P_6>0 && arg1P_1>=1 ], cost: 2+arg1P_1 12: __init -> f66_0_nest_NE : arg1'=0, arg2'=arg2P_4, [], cost: 4 13: __init -> f66_0_nest_NE : arg1'=0, arg2'=arg2P_4, [], cost: 4 Removed unreachable locations (and leaf rules with constant cost): Start location: __init 9: __init -> f66_0_nest_NE : arg1'=0, arg2'=arg2P_2, [ arg2P_6>0 && arg1P_6>0 && arg1P_1>=1 ], cost: 2+arg1P_1 ### Computing asymptotic complexity ### Fully simplified ITS problem Start location: __init 9: __init -> f66_0_nest_NE : arg1'=0, arg2'=arg2P_2, [ arg2P_6>0 && arg1P_6>0 && arg1P_1>=1 ], cost: 2+arg1P_1 Computing asymptotic complexity for rule 9 Resulting cost 0 has complexity: Unknown Obtained the following overall complexity (w.r.t. the length of the input n): Complexity: Constant Cpx degree: 0 Solved cost: 1 Rule cost: 1 Rule guard: [] WORST_CASE(Omega(1),?)