NO

### Pre-processing the ITS problem ###

Initial linear ITS problem
   Start location: __init
      0: f1_0_main_Load -> f142_0_loop_EQ : arg1'=arg1P_1, arg2'=arg2P_1, [ arg1>0 && arg2>-1 && 5==arg1P_1 && arg2==arg2P_1 ], cost: 1
      1: f142_0_loop_EQ -> f142_0_loop_EQ : arg1'=arg1P_2, arg2'=arg2P_2, [ arg2<0 && arg2<-arg1 && 1+arg1==arg1P_2 && 1-arg2==arg2P_2 ], cost: 1
      2: f142_0_loop_EQ -> f142_0_loop_EQ : arg1'=arg1P_3, arg2'=arg2P_3, [ arg2>0 && arg2<-arg1 && 1+arg1==arg1P_3 && 1-arg2==arg2P_3 ], cost: 1
      3: f142_0_loop_EQ -> f142_0_loop_EQ : arg1'=arg1P_4, arg2'=arg2P_4, [ arg2<=arg1 && arg2<0 && arg2>=-arg1 && 1+arg1==arg1P_4 && 0==arg2P_4 ], cost: 1
      4: f142_0_loop_EQ -> f142_0_loop_EQ : arg1'=arg1P_5, arg2'=arg2P_5, [ arg2<=arg1 && arg2>0 && arg2>=-arg1 && 1+arg1==arg1P_5 && 0==arg2P_5 ], cost: 1
      5: f142_0_loop_EQ -> f142_0_loop_EQ : arg1'=arg1P_6, arg2'=arg2P_6, [ arg2>arg1 && arg2<0 && arg2>=-arg1 && 1+arg1==arg1P_6 && -1-arg2==arg2P_6 ], cost: 1
      6: f142_0_loop_EQ -> f142_0_loop_EQ : arg1'=arg1P_7, arg2'=arg2P_7, [ arg2>arg1 && arg2>0 && arg2>=-arg1 && 1+arg1==arg1P_7 && -1-arg2==arg2P_7 ], cost: 1
      7: __init -> f1_0_main_Load : arg1'=arg1P_8, arg2'=arg2P_8, [], cost: 1

Checking for constant complexity:
   The following rule is satisfiable with cost >= 1, yielding constant complexity:
      7: __init -> f1_0_main_Load : arg1'=arg1P_8, arg2'=arg2P_8, [], cost: 1

Removed rules with unsatisfiable guard:
   Start location: __init
      0: f1_0_main_Load -> f142_0_loop_EQ : arg1'=arg1P_1, arg2'=arg2P_1, [ arg1>0 && arg2>-1 && 5==arg1P_1 && arg2==arg2P_1 ], cost: 1
      1: f142_0_loop_EQ -> f142_0_loop_EQ : arg1'=arg1P_2, arg2'=arg2P_2, [ arg2<0 && arg2<-arg1 && 1+arg1==arg1P_2 && 1-arg2==arg2P_2 ], cost: 1
      2: f142_0_loop_EQ -> f142_0_loop_EQ : arg1'=arg1P_3, arg2'=arg2P_3, [ arg2>0 && arg2<-arg1 && 1+arg1==arg1P_3 && 1-arg2==arg2P_3 ], cost: 1
      3: f142_0_loop_EQ -> f142_0_loop_EQ : arg1'=arg1P_4, arg2'=arg2P_4, [ arg2<=arg1 && arg2<0 && arg2>=-arg1 && 1+arg1==arg1P_4 && 0==arg2P_4 ], cost: 1
      4: f142_0_loop_EQ -> f142_0_loop_EQ : arg1'=arg1P_5, arg2'=arg2P_5, [ arg2<=arg1 && arg2>0 && arg2>=-arg1 && 1+arg1==arg1P_5 && 0==arg2P_5 ], cost: 1
      6: f142_0_loop_EQ -> f142_0_loop_EQ : arg1'=arg1P_7, arg2'=arg2P_7, [ arg2>arg1 && arg2>0 && arg2>=-arg1 && 1+arg1==arg1P_7 && -1-arg2==arg2P_7 ], cost: 1
      7: __init -> f1_0_main_Load : arg1'=arg1P_8, arg2'=arg2P_8, [], cost: 1

Simplified all rules, resulting in:
   Start location: __init
      0: f1_0_main_Load -> f142_0_loop_EQ : arg1'=5, [ arg1>0 && arg2>-1 ], cost: 1
      1: f142_0_loop_EQ -> f142_0_loop_EQ : arg1'=1+arg1, arg2'=1-arg2, [ arg2<0 && arg2<-arg1 ], cost: 1
      2: f142_0_loop_EQ -> f142_0_loop_EQ : arg1'=1+arg1, arg2'=1-arg2, [ arg2>0 && arg2<-arg1 ], cost: 1
      3: f142_0_loop_EQ -> f142_0_loop_EQ : arg1'=1+arg1, arg2'=0, [ arg2<0 && arg2>=-arg1 ], cost: 1
      4: f142_0_loop_EQ -> f142_0_loop_EQ : arg1'=1+arg1, arg2'=0, [ arg2<=arg1 && arg2>0 ], cost: 1
      6: f142_0_loop_EQ -> f142_0_loop_EQ : arg1'=1+arg1, arg2'=-1-arg2, [ arg2>arg1 && arg2>0 && arg2>=-arg1 ], cost: 1
      7: __init -> f1_0_main_Load : arg1'=arg1P_8, arg2'=arg2P_8, [], cost: 1

### Simplification by acceleration and chaining ###

Accelerating simple loops of location 1.
   Accelerating the following rules:
      1: f142_0_loop_EQ -> f142_0_loop_EQ : arg1'=1+arg1, arg2'=1-arg2, [ arg2<0 && arg2<-arg1 ], cost: 1
      2: f142_0_loop_EQ -> f142_0_loop_EQ : arg1'=1+arg1, arg2'=1-arg2, [ arg2>0 && arg2<-arg1 ], cost: 1
      3: f142_0_loop_EQ -> f142_0_loop_EQ : arg1'=1+arg1, arg2'=0, [ arg2<0 && arg2>=-arg1 ], cost: 1
      4: f142_0_loop_EQ -> f142_0_loop_EQ : arg1'=1+arg1, arg2'=0, [ arg2<=arg1 && arg2>0 ], cost: 1
      6: f142_0_loop_EQ -> f142_0_loop_EQ : arg1'=1+arg1, arg2'=-1-arg2, [ arg2>arg1 && arg2>0 && arg2>=-arg1 ], cost: 1

   Failed to prove monotonicity of the guard of rule 1.
   Failed to prove monotonicity of the guard of rule 2.
   Failed to prove monotonicity of the guard of rule 3.
   Failed to prove monotonicity of the guard of rule 4.
   Failed to prove monotonicity of the guard of rule 6.
[accelerate] Nesting with 5 inner and 5 outer candidates
   Nested simple loops 2 (outer loop) and 1 (inner loop) with Rule(1 | arg2<0, arg2<-arg1, k>=0, 1-arg2<1-2*k-arg1, | 2*k || 1 | 0=2*k+arg1, ), resulting in the new rules: 8, 9.
   Nested simple loops 6 (outer loop) and 1 (inner loop) with Rule(1 | arg2<0, arg2<-arg1, 1-arg2>=-1-arg1, | NONTERM || 3 | ), resulting in the new rules: 10, 11.
   Nested simple loops 1 (outer loop) and 2 (inner loop) with Rule(1 | 1-arg2<0, 1-arg2<-1-arg1, k_1>=0, arg2<2-2*k_1-arg1, | 2*k_1 || 1 | 0=2*k_1+arg1, ), resulting in the new rules: 12, 13.
   Nested simple loops 1 (outer loop) and 6 (inner loop) with Rule(1 | arg2>arg1, arg2>0, arg2>=-arg1, | NONTERM || 3 | ), resulting in the new rules: 14, 15.
   Removing the simple loops: 1 2 6.
   Also removing duplicate rules: 10 11.

Accelerated all simple loops using metering functions (where possible):
   Start location: __init
      0: f1_0_main_Load -> f142_0_loop_EQ : arg1'=5, [ arg1>0 && arg2>-1 ], cost: 1
      3: f142_0_loop_EQ -> f142_0_loop_EQ : arg1'=1+arg1, arg2'=0, [ arg2<0 && arg2>=-arg1 ], cost: 1
      4: f142_0_loop_EQ -> f142_0_loop_EQ : arg1'=1+arg1, arg2'=0, [ arg2<=arg1 && arg2>0 ], cost: 1
      8: f142_0_loop_EQ -> f142_0_loop_EQ : arg1'=2*k+arg1, [ arg2<0 && arg2<-arg1 && k>=0 && 1-arg2<1-2*k-arg1 ], cost: 2*k
      9: f142_0_loop_EQ -> f142_0_loop_EQ : arg1'=1+2*k+arg1, arg2'=1-arg2, [ arg2<-arg1 && 1-arg2<0 && 1-arg2<-1-arg1 && k>=0 && arg2<-2*k-arg1 ], cost: 1+2*k
     12: f142_0_loop_EQ -> f142_0_loop_EQ : arg1'=2*k_1+arg1, [ 1-arg2<0 && 1-arg2<-1-arg1 && k_1>=0 && arg2<2-2*k_1-arg1 ], cost: 2*k_1
     13: f142_0_loop_EQ -> f142_0_loop_EQ : arg1'=1+2*k_1+arg1, arg2'=1-arg2, [ arg2<0 && arg2<-2-arg1 && k_1>=0 && 1-arg2<1-2*k_1-arg1 ], cost: 1+2*k_1
     14: f142_0_loop_EQ -> [3] : [ arg2>arg1 && arg2>0 && arg2>=-arg1 ], cost: NONTERM
     15: f142_0_loop_EQ -> [3] : [ arg2<0 && arg2<-arg1 && 1-arg2>=-1-arg1 ], cost: NONTERM
      7: __init -> f1_0_main_Load : arg1'=arg1P_8, arg2'=arg2P_8, [], cost: 1

Chained accelerated rules (with incoming rules):
   Start location: __init
      0: f1_0_main_Load -> f142_0_loop_EQ : arg1'=5, [ arg1>0 && arg2>-1 ], cost: 1
     16: f1_0_main_Load -> f142_0_loop_EQ : arg1'=6, arg2'=0, [ arg1>0 && arg2<=5 && arg2>0 ], cost: 2
     17: f1_0_main_Load -> [3] : [ arg1>0 && arg2>5 ], cost: NONTERM
      7: __init -> f1_0_main_Load : arg1'=arg1P_8, arg2'=arg2P_8, [], cost: 1

Removed unreachable locations (and leaf rules with constant cost):
   Start location: __init
     17: f1_0_main_Load -> [3] : [ arg1>0 && arg2>5 ], cost: NONTERM
      7: __init -> f1_0_main_Load : arg1'=arg1P_8, arg2'=arg2P_8, [], cost: 1

Eliminated locations (on linear paths):
   Start location: __init
     18: __init -> [3] : [ arg1P_8>0 && arg2P_8>5 ], cost: NONTERM

### Computing asymptotic complexity ###

Fully simplified ITS problem
   Start location: __init
     18: __init -> [3] : [ arg1P_8>0 && arg2P_8>5 ], cost: NONTERM

Computing asymptotic complexity for rule 18
   Guard is satisfiable, yielding nontermination
   Resulting cost NONTERM has complexity: Nonterm

Found new complexity Nonterm.

Obtained the following overall complexity (w.r.t. the length of the input n):
   Complexity:  Nonterm
   Cpx degree:  Nonterm
   Solved cost: NONTERM
   Rule cost:   NONTERM
   Rule guard:  [ arg1P_8>0 && arg2P_8>5 ]

NO