NO

### Pre-processing the ITS problem ###

Initial linear ITS problem
   Start location: l4
      0: l0 -> l1 : Result_4^0'=Result_4^post_1, cnt_29^0'=cnt_29^post_1, lt_10^0'=lt_10^post_1, lt_11^0'=lt_11^post_1, lt_12^0'=lt_12^post_1, px_8^0'=px_8^post_1, py_6^0'=py_6^post_1, q_9^0'=q_9^post_1, x_7^0'=x_7^post_1, y_5^0'=y_5^post_1, [ lt_11^1_1==x_7^0 && lt_12^1_1==cnt_29^0 && 0<=-1+lt_12^1_1 && lt_11^post_1==lt_11^post_1 && lt_12^post_1==lt_12^post_1 && lt_10^1_1==cnt_29^0 && lt_10^post_1==lt_10^post_1 && Result_4^0==Result_4^post_1 && cnt_29^0==cnt_29^post_1 && px_8^0==px_8^post_1 && py_6^0==py_6^post_1 && q_9^0==q_9^post_1 && x_7^0==x_7^post_1 && y_5^0==y_5^post_1 ], cost: 1
      2: l0 -> l2 : Result_4^0'=Result_4^post_3, cnt_29^0'=cnt_29^post_3, lt_10^0'=lt_10^post_3, lt_11^0'=lt_11^post_3, lt_12^0'=lt_12^post_3, px_8^0'=px_8^post_3, py_6^0'=py_6^post_3, q_9^0'=q_9^post_3, x_7^0'=x_7^post_3, y_5^0'=y_5^post_3, [ lt_11^1_2==x_7^0 && lt_12^1_2_1==cnt_29^0 && lt_12^1_2_1<=0 && lt_11^post_3==lt_11^post_3 && lt_12^post_3==lt_12^post_3 && Result_4^post_3==Result_4^post_3 && cnt_29^0==cnt_29^post_3 && lt_10^0==lt_10^post_3 && px_8^0==px_8^post_3 && py_6^0==py_6^post_3 && q_9^0==q_9^post_3 && x_7^0==x_7^post_3 && y_5^0==y_5^post_3 ], cost: 1
      1: l1 -> l0 : Result_4^0'=Result_4^post_2, cnt_29^0'=cnt_29^post_2, lt_10^0'=lt_10^post_2, lt_11^0'=lt_11^post_2, lt_12^0'=lt_12^post_2, px_8^0'=px_8^post_2, py_6^0'=py_6^post_2, q_9^0'=q_9^post_2, x_7^0'=x_7^post_2, y_5^0'=y_5^post_2, [ Result_4^0==Result_4^post_2 && cnt_29^0==cnt_29^post_2 && lt_10^0==lt_10^post_2 && lt_11^0==lt_11^post_2 && lt_12^0==lt_12^post_2 && px_8^0==px_8^post_2 && py_6^0==py_6^post_2 && q_9^0==q_9^post_2 && x_7^0==x_7^post_2 && y_5^0==y_5^post_2 ], cost: 1
      3: l3 -> l0 : Result_4^0'=Result_4^post_4, cnt_29^0'=cnt_29^post_4, lt_10^0'=lt_10^post_4, lt_11^0'=lt_11^post_4, lt_12^0'=lt_12^post_4, px_8^0'=px_8^post_4, py_6^0'=py_6^post_4, q_9^0'=q_9^post_4, x_7^0'=x_7^post_4, y_5^0'=y_5^post_4, [ px_8^post_4==px_8^post_4 && x_7^post_4==x_7^post_4 && y_5^post_4==y_5^post_4 && py_6^post_4==y_5^post_4 && q_9^post_4==px_8^post_4 && Result_4^0==Result_4^post_4 && cnt_29^0==cnt_29^post_4 && lt_10^0==lt_10^post_4 && lt_11^0==lt_11^post_4 && lt_12^0==lt_12^post_4 ], cost: 1
      4: l4 -> l3 : Result_4^0'=Result_4^post_5, cnt_29^0'=cnt_29^post_5, lt_10^0'=lt_10^post_5, lt_11^0'=lt_11^post_5, lt_12^0'=lt_12^post_5, px_8^0'=px_8^post_5, py_6^0'=py_6^post_5, q_9^0'=q_9^post_5, x_7^0'=x_7^post_5, y_5^0'=y_5^post_5, [ Result_4^0==Result_4^post_5 && cnt_29^0==cnt_29^post_5 && lt_10^0==lt_10^post_5 && lt_11^0==lt_11^post_5 && lt_12^0==lt_12^post_5 && px_8^0==px_8^post_5 && py_6^0==py_6^post_5 && q_9^0==q_9^post_5 && x_7^0==x_7^post_5 && y_5^0==y_5^post_5 ], cost: 1

Checking for constant complexity:
   The following rule is satisfiable with cost >= 1, yielding constant complexity:
      4: l4 -> l3 : Result_4^0'=Result_4^post_5, cnt_29^0'=cnt_29^post_5, lt_10^0'=lt_10^post_5, lt_11^0'=lt_11^post_5, lt_12^0'=lt_12^post_5, px_8^0'=px_8^post_5, py_6^0'=py_6^post_5, q_9^0'=q_9^post_5, x_7^0'=x_7^post_5, y_5^0'=y_5^post_5, [ Result_4^0==Result_4^post_5 && cnt_29^0==cnt_29^post_5 && lt_10^0==lt_10^post_5 && lt_11^0==lt_11^post_5 && lt_12^0==lt_12^post_5 && px_8^0==px_8^post_5 && py_6^0==py_6^post_5 && q_9^0==q_9^post_5 && x_7^0==x_7^post_5 && y_5^0==y_5^post_5 ], cost: 1

Removed unreachable and leaf rules:
   Start location: l4
      0: l0 -> l1 : Result_4^0'=Result_4^post_1, cnt_29^0'=cnt_29^post_1, lt_10^0'=lt_10^post_1, lt_11^0'=lt_11^post_1, lt_12^0'=lt_12^post_1, px_8^0'=px_8^post_1, py_6^0'=py_6^post_1, q_9^0'=q_9^post_1, x_7^0'=x_7^post_1, y_5^0'=y_5^post_1, [ lt_11^1_1==x_7^0 && lt_12^1_1==cnt_29^0 && 0<=-1+lt_12^1_1 && lt_11^post_1==lt_11^post_1 && lt_12^post_1==lt_12^post_1 && lt_10^1_1==cnt_29^0 && lt_10^post_1==lt_10^post_1 && Result_4^0==Result_4^post_1 && cnt_29^0==cnt_29^post_1 && px_8^0==px_8^post_1 && py_6^0==py_6^post_1 && q_9^0==q_9^post_1 && x_7^0==x_7^post_1 && y_5^0==y_5^post_1 ], cost: 1
      1: l1 -> l0 : Result_4^0'=Result_4^post_2, cnt_29^0'=cnt_29^post_2, lt_10^0'=lt_10^post_2, lt_11^0'=lt_11^post_2, lt_12^0'=lt_12^post_2, px_8^0'=px_8^post_2, py_6^0'=py_6^post_2, q_9^0'=q_9^post_2, x_7^0'=x_7^post_2, y_5^0'=y_5^post_2, [ Result_4^0==Result_4^post_2 && cnt_29^0==cnt_29^post_2 && lt_10^0==lt_10^post_2 && lt_11^0==lt_11^post_2 && lt_12^0==lt_12^post_2 && px_8^0==px_8^post_2 && py_6^0==py_6^post_2 && q_9^0==q_9^post_2 && x_7^0==x_7^post_2 && y_5^0==y_5^post_2 ], cost: 1
      3: l3 -> l0 : Result_4^0'=Result_4^post_4, cnt_29^0'=cnt_29^post_4, lt_10^0'=lt_10^post_4, lt_11^0'=lt_11^post_4, lt_12^0'=lt_12^post_4, px_8^0'=px_8^post_4, py_6^0'=py_6^post_4, q_9^0'=q_9^post_4, x_7^0'=x_7^post_4, y_5^0'=y_5^post_4, [ px_8^post_4==px_8^post_4 && x_7^post_4==x_7^post_4 && y_5^post_4==y_5^post_4 && py_6^post_4==y_5^post_4 && q_9^post_4==px_8^post_4 && Result_4^0==Result_4^post_4 && cnt_29^0==cnt_29^post_4 && lt_10^0==lt_10^post_4 && lt_11^0==lt_11^post_4 && lt_12^0==lt_12^post_4 ], cost: 1
      4: l4 -> l3 : Result_4^0'=Result_4^post_5, cnt_29^0'=cnt_29^post_5, lt_10^0'=lt_10^post_5, lt_11^0'=lt_11^post_5, lt_12^0'=lt_12^post_5, px_8^0'=px_8^post_5, py_6^0'=py_6^post_5, q_9^0'=q_9^post_5, x_7^0'=x_7^post_5, y_5^0'=y_5^post_5, [ Result_4^0==Result_4^post_5 && cnt_29^0==cnt_29^post_5 && lt_10^0==lt_10^post_5 && lt_11^0==lt_11^post_5 && lt_12^0==lt_12^post_5 && px_8^0==px_8^post_5 && py_6^0==py_6^post_5 && q_9^0==q_9^post_5 && x_7^0==x_7^post_5 && y_5^0==y_5^post_5 ], cost: 1

Simplified all rules, resulting in:
   Start location: l4
      0: l0 -> l1 : lt_10^0'=lt_10^post_1, lt_11^0'=lt_11^post_1, lt_12^0'=lt_12^post_1, [ 0<=-1+cnt_29^0 ], cost: 1
      1: l1 -> l0 : [], cost: 1
      3: l3 -> l0 : px_8^0'=px_8^post_4, py_6^0'=py_6^post_4, q_9^0'=px_8^post_4, x_7^0'=x_7^post_4, y_5^0'=py_6^post_4, [], cost: 1
      4: l4 -> l3 : [], cost: 1

### Simplification by acceleration and chaining ###

Eliminated locations (on linear paths):
   Start location: l4
      6: l0 -> l0 : lt_10^0'=lt_10^post_1, lt_11^0'=lt_11^post_1, lt_12^0'=lt_12^post_1, [ 0<=-1+cnt_29^0 ], cost: 2
      5: l4 -> l0 : px_8^0'=px_8^post_4, py_6^0'=py_6^post_4, q_9^0'=px_8^post_4, x_7^0'=x_7^post_4, y_5^0'=py_6^post_4, [], cost: 2

Accelerating simple loops of location 0.
   Accelerating the following rules:
      6: l0 -> l0 : lt_10^0'=lt_10^post_1, lt_11^0'=lt_11^post_1, lt_12^0'=lt_12^post_1, [ 0<=-1+cnt_29^0 ], cost: 2

   Accelerated rule 6 with non-termination, yielding the new rule 7.
[accelerate] Nesting with 0 inner and 0 outer candidates
   Removing the simple loops: 6.

Accelerated all simple loops using metering functions (where possible):
   Start location: l4
      7: l0 -> [5] : [ 0<=-1+cnt_29^0 ], cost: NONTERM
      5: l4 -> l0 : px_8^0'=px_8^post_4, py_6^0'=py_6^post_4, q_9^0'=px_8^post_4, x_7^0'=x_7^post_4, y_5^0'=py_6^post_4, [], cost: 2

Chained accelerated rules (with incoming rules):
   Start location: l4
      5: l4 -> l0 : px_8^0'=px_8^post_4, py_6^0'=py_6^post_4, q_9^0'=px_8^post_4, x_7^0'=x_7^post_4, y_5^0'=py_6^post_4, [], cost: 2
      8: l4 -> [5] : [ 0<=-1+cnt_29^0 ], cost: NONTERM

Removed unreachable locations (and leaf rules with constant cost):
   Start location: l4
      8: l4 -> [5] : [ 0<=-1+cnt_29^0 ], cost: NONTERM

### Computing asymptotic complexity ###

Fully simplified ITS problem
   Start location: l4
      8: l4 -> [5] : [ 0<=-1+cnt_29^0 ], cost: NONTERM

Computing asymptotic complexity for rule 8
   Guard is satisfiable, yielding nontermination
   Resulting cost NONTERM has complexity: Nonterm

Found new complexity Nonterm.

Obtained the following overall complexity (w.r.t. the length of the input n):
   Complexity:  Nonterm
   Cpx degree:  Nonterm
   Solved cost: NONTERM
   Rule cost:   NONTERM
   Rule guard:  [ 0<=-1+cnt_29^0 ]

NO