YES

Prover = TRS(tech=GUIDED_UNF_TRIPLES, nb_unfoldings=unlimited, unfold_variables=false, max_nb_coefficients=12, max_nb_unfolded_rules=-1, strategy=LEFTMOST_NE)

** BEGIN proof argument **
All the DP problems were proved finite.
As all the involved DP processors are sound,
the TRS under analysis terminates.
** END proof argument **

** BEGIN proof description **
## Searching for a generalized rewrite rule
(a rule whose right-hand side contains a variable
that does not occur in the left-hand side)...
No generalized rewrite rule found!

## Applying the DP framework...
## Round 1:
  ## DP problem: 
  Dependency pairs = [f^#(f(_0,_1,_2),_3,f(_0,_1,_4)) -> f^#(_0,_1,f(_2,_3,_4)), f^#(f(_0,_1,_2),_3,f(_0,_1,_4)) -> f^#(_2,_3,_4)]
  TRS = {f(f(_0,_1,_2),_3,f(_0,_1,_4)) -> f(_0,_1,f(_2,_3,_4)), f(_0,_1,_1) -> _1, f(_0,_1,g(_1)) -> _0, f(_0,_0,_1) -> _0, f(g(_0),_0,_1) -> _1}
    ## Trying with homeomorphic embeddings... Failed!
    ## Trying with polynomial interpretations...
      The constraints are satisfied by the polynomials:
      {f(_0,_1,_2):[_0 * _1 * _2], g(_0):[_0], f^#(_0,_1,_2):[_0 * _1 * _2]}
      for all instantiations of the variables with values greater than or equal to mu = 2.
  This DP problem is finite.

** END proof description **

Proof stopped at iteration 0
Number of unfolded rules generated by this proof = 0
Number of unfolded rules generated by all the parallel proofs = 6633