YES

Prover = TRS(tech=GUIDED_UNF_TRIPLES, nb_unfoldings=unlimited, unfold_variables=false, max_nb_coefficients=12, max_nb_unfolded_rules=-1, strategy=LEFTMOST_NE)

** BEGIN proof argument **
All the DP problems were proved finite.
As all the involved DP processors are sound,
the TRS under analysis terminates.
** END proof argument **

** BEGIN proof description **
## Searching for a generalized rewrite rule
(a rule whose right-hand side contains a variable
that does not occur in the left-hand side)...
No generalized rewrite rule found!

## Applying the DP framework...
## Round 1:
  ## DP problem: 
  Dependency pairs = [*^#(_0,+(_1,_2)) -> *^#(_0,_1), *^#(_0,+(_1,_2)) -> *^#(_0,_2), *^#(_0,minus(_1)) -> *^#(_0,_1)]
  TRS = {+(_0,0) -> _0, +(minus(_0),_0) -> 0, minus(0) -> 0, minus(minus(_0)) -> _0, minus(+(_0,_1)) -> +(minus(_1),minus(_0)), *(_0,1) -> _0, *(_0,0) -> 0, *(_0,+(_1,_2)) -> +(*(_0,_1),*(_0,_2)), *(_0,minus(_1)) -> minus(*(_0,_1))}
    ## Trying with homeomorphic embeddings... Success!
  This DP problem is finite.
  ## DP problem: 
  Dependency pairs = [minus^#(+(_0,_1)) -> minus^#(_1), minus^#(+(_0,_1)) -> minus^#(_0)]
  TRS = {+(_0,0) -> _0, +(minus(_0),_0) -> 0, minus(0) -> 0, minus(minus(_0)) -> _0, minus(+(_0,_1)) -> +(minus(_1),minus(_0)), *(_0,1) -> _0, *(_0,0) -> 0, *(_0,+(_1,_2)) -> +(*(_0,_1),*(_0,_2)), *(_0,minus(_1)) -> minus(*(_0,_1))}
    ## Trying with homeomorphic embeddings... Success!
  This DP problem is finite.

** END proof description **

Proof stopped at iteration 0
Number of unfolded rules generated by this proof = 0
Number of unfolded rules generated by all the parallel proofs = 0