DON'T KNOW

Prover = TRS(tech=PATTERN_RULES, nb_unfoldings=unlimited, max_nb_unfolded_rules=200)

** BEGIN proof description **
## Searching for a generalized rewrite rule
(a rule whose right-hand side contains a variable
that does not occur in the left-hand side)...
No generalized rewrite rule found!

## Applying the DP framework...
## Round 1:
  ## DP problem: 
  Dependency pairs = [and^#(not(not(_0)),_1,not(_2)) -> and^#(_1,band(_0,_2),_0)]
  TRS = {and(not(not(_0)),_1,not(_2)) -> and(_1,band(_0,_2),_0)}
    ## Trying with homeomorphic embeddings... Failed!
    ## Trying with polynomial interpretations... Too many coefficients (15)! Aborting!
    ## Trying with lexicographic path orders... Failed!
    ## Trying to prove nontermination by unfolding the dependency pairs with the rules of the TRS
        # Iteration 0: nontermination not detected, 1 unfolded rule generated.
        # Iteration 1: nontermination not detected, 1 unfolded rule generated.
        # Iteration 2: nontermination not detected, 0 unfolded rule generated.
        Nontermination not detected!
  Don't know whether this DP problem is finite.
Could not solve the following DP problems:
1: Dependency pairs = [and^#(not(not(_0)),_1,not(_2)) -> and^#(_1,band(_0,_2),_0)]
TRS = {and(not(not(_0)),_1,not(_2)) -> and(_1,band(_0,_2),_0)}
Hence, could not prove (non)termination of the TRS under analysis.

** END proof description **

Proof stopped at iteration 2
Number of unfolded rules generated by this proof = 2
Number of unfolded rules generated by all the parallel proofs = 18