YES

Prover = TRS(tech=GUIDED_UNF_TRIPLES, nb_unfoldings=unlimited, unfold_variables=false, max_nb_coefficients=12, max_nb_unfolded_rules=-1, strategy=LEFTMOST_NE)

** BEGIN proof argument **
All the DP problems were proved finite.
As all the involved DP processors are sound,
the TRS under analysis terminates.
** END proof argument **

** BEGIN proof description **
## Searching for a generalized rewrite rule
(a rule whose right-hand side contains a variable
that does not occur in the left-hand side)...
No generalized rewrite rule found!

## Applying the DP framework...
## Round 1:
  ## DP problem: 
  Dependency pairs = [and^#(xor(_0,_1),_2) -> and^#(_0,_2), and^#(xor(_0,_1),_2) -> and^#(_1,_2)]
  TRS = {not(_0) -> xor(_0,true), or(_0,_1) -> xor(and(_0,_1),xor(_0,_1)), implies(_0,_1) -> xor(and(_0,_1),xor(_0,true)), and(_0,true) -> _0, and(_0,false) -> false, and(_0,_0) -> _0, xor(_0,false) -> _0, xor(_0,_0) -> false, and(xor(_0,_1),_2) -> xor(and(_0,_2),and(_1,_2))}
    ## Trying with homeomorphic embeddings... Success!
  This DP problem is finite.

** END proof description **

Proof stopped at iteration 0
Number of unfolded rules generated by this proof = 0
Number of unfolded rules generated by all the parallel proofs = 0