YES

Prover = TRS(tech=PATTERN_RULES, nb_unfoldings=unlimited, max_nb_unfolded_rules=200)

** BEGIN proof argument **
All the DP problems were proved finite.
As all the involved DP processors are sound,
the TRS under analysis terminates.
** END proof argument **

** BEGIN proof description **
## Searching for a generalized rewrite rule
(a rule whose right-hand side contains a variable
that does not occur in the left-hand side)...
No generalized rewrite rule found!

## Applying the DP framework...
## Round 1:
  ## DP problem: 
  Dependency pairs = [+^#(s(_0),s(_1)) -> +^#(s(_0),+(_1,0))]
  TRS = {+(0,_0) -> _0, +(s(_0),0) -> s(_0), +(s(_0),s(_1)) -> s(+(s(_0),+(_1,0)))}
    ## Trying with homeomorphic embeddings... Failed!
    ## Trying with polynomial interpretations...
      The constraints are satisfied by the polynomials:
      {+(_0,_1):[_0 * _1], 0:[1], s(_0):[2 * _0], +^#(_0,_1):[_0 * _1]}
      for all instantiations of the variables with values greater than or equal to mu = 1.
  This DP problem is finite.

** END proof description **

Proof stopped at iteration 0
Number of unfolded rules generated by this proof = 0
Number of unfolded rules generated by all the parallel proofs = 11