NO proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 794c25de1cacf0d048858bcd21c9a779e1221865 marcel 20200619 unpublished dirty Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be disproven: (0) QTRS (1) QTRSToCSRProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (2) CSR (3) CSRRRRProof [EQUIVALENT, 52 ms] (4) CSR (5) CSRRRRProof [EQUIVALENT, 11 ms] (6) CSR (7) ContextSensitiveLoopProof [COMPLETE, 44 ms] (8) NO ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: Q restricted rewrite system: The TRS R consists of the following rules: active(zeros) -> mark(cons(0, zeros)) active(U11(tt, L)) -> mark(U12(tt, L)) active(U12(tt, L)) -> mark(s(length(L))) active(U21(tt, IL, M, N)) -> mark(U22(tt, IL, M, N)) active(U22(tt, IL, M, N)) -> mark(U23(tt, IL, M, N)) active(U23(tt, IL, M, N)) -> mark(cons(N, take(M, IL))) active(length(nil)) -> mark(0) active(length(cons(N, L))) -> mark(U11(tt, L)) active(take(0, IL)) -> mark(nil) active(take(s(M), cons(N, IL))) -> mark(U21(tt, IL, M, N)) active(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(active(X1), X2) active(U11(X1, X2)) -> U11(active(X1), X2) active(U12(X1, X2)) -> U12(active(X1), X2) active(s(X)) -> s(active(X)) active(length(X)) -> length(active(X)) active(U21(X1, X2, X3, X4)) -> U21(active(X1), X2, X3, X4) active(U22(X1, X2, X3, X4)) -> U22(active(X1), X2, X3, X4) active(U23(X1, X2, X3, X4)) -> U23(active(X1), X2, X3, X4) active(take(X1, X2)) -> take(active(X1), X2) active(take(X1, X2)) -> take(X1, active(X2)) cons(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(cons(X1, X2)) U11(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(U11(X1, X2)) U12(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(U12(X1, X2)) s(mark(X)) -> mark(s(X)) length(mark(X)) -> mark(length(X)) U21(mark(X1), X2, X3, X4) -> mark(U21(X1, X2, X3, X4)) U22(mark(X1), X2, X3, X4) -> mark(U22(X1, X2, X3, X4)) U23(mark(X1), X2, X3, X4) -> mark(U23(X1, X2, X3, X4)) take(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(take(X1, X2)) take(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(take(X1, X2)) proper(zeros) -> ok(zeros) proper(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(proper(X1), proper(X2)) proper(0) -> ok(0) proper(U11(X1, X2)) -> U11(proper(X1), proper(X2)) proper(tt) -> ok(tt) proper(U12(X1, X2)) -> U12(proper(X1), proper(X2)) proper(s(X)) -> s(proper(X)) proper(length(X)) -> length(proper(X)) proper(U21(X1, X2, X3, X4)) -> U21(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3), proper(X4)) proper(U22(X1, X2, X3, X4)) -> U22(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3), proper(X4)) proper(U23(X1, X2, X3, X4)) -> U23(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3), proper(X4)) proper(take(X1, X2)) -> take(proper(X1), proper(X2)) proper(nil) -> ok(nil) cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(cons(X1, X2)) U11(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(U11(X1, X2)) U12(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(U12(X1, X2)) s(ok(X)) -> ok(s(X)) length(ok(X)) -> ok(length(X)) U21(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3), ok(X4)) -> ok(U21(X1, X2, X3, X4)) U22(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3), ok(X4)) -> ok(U22(X1, X2, X3, X4)) U23(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3), ok(X4)) -> ok(U23(X1, X2, X3, X4)) take(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(take(X1, X2)) top(mark(X)) -> top(proper(X)) top(ok(X)) -> top(active(X)) Q is empty. ---------------------------------------- (1) QTRSToCSRProof (EQUIVALENT) The following Q TRS is given: Q restricted rewrite system: The TRS R consists of the following rules: active(zeros) -> mark(cons(0, zeros)) active(U11(tt, L)) -> mark(U12(tt, L)) active(U12(tt, L)) -> mark(s(length(L))) active(U21(tt, IL, M, N)) -> mark(U22(tt, IL, M, N)) active(U22(tt, IL, M, N)) -> mark(U23(tt, IL, M, N)) active(U23(tt, IL, M, N)) -> mark(cons(N, take(M, IL))) active(length(nil)) -> mark(0) active(length(cons(N, L))) -> mark(U11(tt, L)) active(take(0, IL)) -> mark(nil) active(take(s(M), cons(N, IL))) -> mark(U21(tt, IL, M, N)) active(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(active(X1), X2) active(U11(X1, X2)) -> U11(active(X1), X2) active(U12(X1, X2)) -> U12(active(X1), X2) active(s(X)) -> s(active(X)) active(length(X)) -> length(active(X)) active(U21(X1, X2, X3, X4)) -> U21(active(X1), X2, X3, X4) active(U22(X1, X2, X3, X4)) -> U22(active(X1), X2, X3, X4) active(U23(X1, X2, X3, X4)) -> U23(active(X1), X2, X3, X4) active(take(X1, X2)) -> take(active(X1), X2) active(take(X1, X2)) -> take(X1, active(X2)) cons(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(cons(X1, X2)) U11(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(U11(X1, X2)) U12(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(U12(X1, X2)) s(mark(X)) -> mark(s(X)) length(mark(X)) -> mark(length(X)) U21(mark(X1), X2, X3, X4) -> mark(U21(X1, X2, X3, X4)) U22(mark(X1), X2, X3, X4) -> mark(U22(X1, X2, X3, X4)) U23(mark(X1), X2, X3, X4) -> mark(U23(X1, X2, X3, X4)) take(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(take(X1, X2)) take(X1, mark(X2)) -> mark(take(X1, X2)) proper(zeros) -> ok(zeros) proper(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(proper(X1), proper(X2)) proper(0) -> ok(0) proper(U11(X1, X2)) -> U11(proper(X1), proper(X2)) proper(tt) -> ok(tt) proper(U12(X1, X2)) -> U12(proper(X1), proper(X2)) proper(s(X)) -> s(proper(X)) proper(length(X)) -> length(proper(X)) proper(U21(X1, X2, X3, X4)) -> U21(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3), proper(X4)) proper(U22(X1, X2, X3, X4)) -> U22(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3), proper(X4)) proper(U23(X1, X2, X3, X4)) -> U23(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3), proper(X4)) proper(take(X1, X2)) -> take(proper(X1), proper(X2)) proper(nil) -> ok(nil) cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(cons(X1, X2)) U11(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(U11(X1, X2)) U12(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(U12(X1, X2)) s(ok(X)) -> ok(s(X)) length(ok(X)) -> ok(length(X)) U21(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3), ok(X4)) -> ok(U21(X1, X2, X3, X4)) U22(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3), ok(X4)) -> ok(U22(X1, X2, X3, X4)) U23(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3), ok(X4)) -> ok(U23(X1, X2, X3, X4)) take(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(take(X1, X2)) top(mark(X)) -> top(proper(X)) top(ok(X)) -> top(active(X)) Q is empty. Special symbols used for the transformation (see [GM04]): top: top_1, active: active_1, mark: mark_1, ok: ok_1, proper: proper_1 The replacement map contains the following entries: zeros: empty set cons: {1} 0: empty set U11: {1} tt: empty set U12: {1} s: {1} length: {1} U21: {1} U22: {1} U23: {1} take: {1, 2} nil: empty set The QTRS contained all rules created by the complete Giesl-Middeldorp transformation. Therefore, the inverse transformation is complete (and sound). ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: Context-sensitive rewrite system: The TRS R consists of the following rules: zeros -> cons(0, zeros) U11(tt, L) -> U12(tt, L) U12(tt, L) -> s(length(L)) U21(tt, IL, M, N) -> U22(tt, IL, M, N) U22(tt, IL, M, N) -> U23(tt, IL, M, N) U23(tt, IL, M, N) -> cons(N, take(M, IL)) length(nil) -> 0 length(cons(N, L)) -> U11(tt, L) take(0, IL) -> nil take(s(M), cons(N, IL)) -> U21(tt, IL, M, N) The replacement map contains the following entries: zeros: empty set cons: {1} 0: empty set U11: {1} tt: empty set U12: {1} s: {1} length: {1} U21: {1} U22: {1} U23: {1} take: {1, 2} nil: empty set ---------------------------------------- (3) CSRRRRProof (EQUIVALENT) The following CSR is given: Context-sensitive rewrite system: The TRS R consists of the following rules: zeros -> cons(0, zeros) U11(tt, L) -> U12(tt, L) U12(tt, L) -> s(length(L)) U21(tt, IL, M, N) -> U22(tt, IL, M, N) U22(tt, IL, M, N) -> U23(tt, IL, M, N) U23(tt, IL, M, N) -> cons(N, take(M, IL)) length(nil) -> 0 length(cons(N, L)) -> U11(tt, L) take(0, IL) -> nil take(s(M), cons(N, IL)) -> U21(tt, IL, M, N) The replacement map contains the following entries: zeros: empty set cons: {1} 0: empty set U11: {1} tt: empty set U12: {1} s: {1} length: {1} U21: {1} U22: {1} U23: {1} take: {1, 2} nil: empty set Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]: POL(0) = 0 POL(U11(x_1, x_2)) = x_1 + x_2 POL(U12(x_1, x_2)) = x_1 + x_2 POL(U21(x_1, x_2, x_3, x_4)) = 1 + x_1 + 2*x_2 + x_3 + 2*x_4 POL(U22(x_1, x_2, x_3, x_4)) = 1 + x_1 + 2*x_2 + x_3 + 2*x_4 POL(U23(x_1, x_2, x_3, x_4)) = 1 + 2*x_1 + 2*x_2 + x_3 + 2*x_4 POL(cons(x_1, x_2)) = 2*x_1 + x_2 POL(length(x_1)) = x_1 POL(nil) = 1 POL(s(x_1)) = x_1 POL(take(x_1, x_2)) = 1 + x_1 + 2*x_2 POL(tt) = 0 POL(zeros) = 0 With this ordering the following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [LPAR04] because they are oriented strictly: length(nil) -> 0 ---------------------------------------- (4) Obligation: Context-sensitive rewrite system: The TRS R consists of the following rules: zeros -> cons(0, zeros) U11(tt, L) -> U12(tt, L) U12(tt, L) -> s(length(L)) U21(tt, IL, M, N) -> U22(tt, IL, M, N) U22(tt, IL, M, N) -> U23(tt, IL, M, N) U23(tt, IL, M, N) -> cons(N, take(M, IL)) length(cons(N, L)) -> U11(tt, L) take(0, IL) -> nil take(s(M), cons(N, IL)) -> U21(tt, IL, M, N) The replacement map contains the following entries: zeros: empty set cons: {1} 0: empty set U11: {1} tt: empty set U12: {1} s: {1} length: {1} U21: {1} U22: {1} U23: {1} take: {1, 2} nil: empty set ---------------------------------------- (5) CSRRRRProof (EQUIVALENT) The following CSR is given: Context-sensitive rewrite system: The TRS R consists of the following rules: zeros -> cons(0, zeros) U11(tt, L) -> U12(tt, L) U12(tt, L) -> s(length(L)) U21(tt, IL, M, N) -> U22(tt, IL, M, N) U22(tt, IL, M, N) -> U23(tt, IL, M, N) U23(tt, IL, M, N) -> cons(N, take(M, IL)) length(cons(N, L)) -> U11(tt, L) take(0, IL) -> nil take(s(M), cons(N, IL)) -> U21(tt, IL, M, N) The replacement map contains the following entries: zeros: empty set cons: {1} 0: empty set U11: {1} tt: empty set U12: {1} s: {1} length: {1} U21: {1} U22: {1} U23: {1} take: {1, 2} nil: empty set Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]: POL(0) = 0 POL(U11(x_1, x_2)) = x_1 + x_2 POL(U12(x_1, x_2)) = x_1 + x_2 POL(U21(x_1, x_2, x_3, x_4)) = 1 + x_1 + x_2 + x_3 + x_4 POL(U22(x_1, x_2, x_3, x_4)) = 1 + x_1 + x_2 + x_3 + x_4 POL(U23(x_1, x_2, x_3, x_4)) = 1 + x_1 + x_2 + x_3 + x_4 POL(cons(x_1, x_2)) = x_1 + x_2 POL(length(x_1)) = x_1 POL(nil) = 0 POL(s(x_1)) = x_1 POL(take(x_1, x_2)) = 1 + x_1 + x_2 POL(tt) = 0 POL(zeros) = 0 With this ordering the following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [LPAR04] because they are oriented strictly: take(0, IL) -> nil ---------------------------------------- (6) Obligation: Context-sensitive rewrite system: The TRS R consists of the following rules: zeros -> cons(0, zeros) U11(tt, L) -> U12(tt, L) U12(tt, L) -> s(length(L)) U21(tt, IL, M, N) -> U22(tt, IL, M, N) U22(tt, IL, M, N) -> U23(tt, IL, M, N) U23(tt, IL, M, N) -> cons(N, take(M, IL)) length(cons(N, L)) -> U11(tt, L) take(s(M), cons(N, IL)) -> U21(tt, IL, M, N) The replacement map contains the following entries: zeros: empty set cons: {1} 0: empty set U11: {1} tt: empty set U12: {1} s: {1} length: {1} U21: {1} U22: {1} U23: {1} take: {1, 2} ---------------------------------------- (7) ContextSensitiveLoopProof (COMPLETE) zeros -> cons(0, zeros) U11(tt, L) -> U12(tt, L) U12(tt, L) -> s(length(L)) U21(tt, IL, M, N) -> U22(tt, IL, M, N) U22(tt, IL, M, N) -> U23(tt, IL, M, N) U23(tt, IL, M, N) -> cons(N, take(M, IL)) length(cons(N, L)) -> U11(tt, L) take(s(M), cons(N, IL)) -> U21(tt, IL, M, N) ---------- Loop: ---------- U12(tt, zeros) -> s(length(zeros)) with rule U12(tt, L) -> s(length(L)) at position [] and matcher [L / zeros] s(length(zeros)) -> s(length(cons(0, zeros))) with rule zeros -> cons(0, zeros) at position [0,0] and matcher [ ] s(length(cons(0, zeros))) -> s(U11(tt, zeros)) with rule length(cons(N, L)) -> U11(tt, L) at position [0] and matcher [N / 0, L / zeros] s(U11(tt, zeros)) -> s(U12(tt, zeros)) with rule U11(tt, L) -> U12(tt, L) at position [0] and matcher [L / zeros] Now an instance of the first term with Matcher [ ] occurs in the last term at position [0]. Context: s([]) We used [[THIEMANN_LOOPS_UNDER_STRATEGIES], Theorem 1] to show that this loop is an context-sensitive loop. ---------------------------------------- (8) NO