YES

Prover = TRS(tech=PATTERN_RULES, nb_unfoldings=unlimited, max_nb_unfolded_rules=200)

** BEGIN proof argument **
All the DP problems were proved finite.
As all the involved DP processors are sound,
the TRS under analysis terminates.
** END proof argument **

** BEGIN proof description **
## Searching for a generalized rewrite rule
(a rule whose right-hand side contains a variable
that does not occur in the left-hand side)...
No generalized rewrite rule found!

## Applying the DP framework...
## Round 1:
  ## DP problem: 
  Dependency pairs = [__^#(__(_0,_1),_2) -> __^#(_0,__(_1,_2)), __^#(__(_0,_1),_2) -> __^#(_1,_2)]
  TRS = {__(__(_0,_1),_2) -> __(_0,__(_1,_2)), __(_0,nil) -> _0, __(nil,_0) -> _0, U11(tt) -> U12(tt), U12(tt) -> tt, isNePal(__(_0,__(_1,_0))) -> U11(tt)}
    ## Trying with homeomorphic embeddings... Failed!
    ## Trying with polynomial interpretations... Too many coefficients (13)! Aborting!
    ## Trying with lexicographic path orders...
      The constraints are satisfied by the lexicographic path order using the precedence:
      __ > [U12, U11, tt], U11 > [U12]
      and the argument filtering:
      {__:[0, 1], U12:[0], isNePal:[0], U11:[0], __^#:[0, 1]}
  This DP problem is finite.

** END proof description **

Proof stopped at iteration 0
Number of unfolded rules generated by this proof = 0
Number of unfolded rules generated by all the parallel proofs = 18