YES Problem: __(__(X,Y),Z) -> __(X,__(Y,Z)) __(X,nil()) -> X __(nil(),X) -> X U11(tt()) -> U12(tt()) U12(tt()) -> tt() isNePal(__(I,__(P,I))) -> U11(tt()) activate(X) -> X Proof: Matrix Interpretation Processor: dim=1 interpretation: [U12](x0) = x0, [nil] = 3, [U11](x0) = x0, [isNePal](x0) = x0 + 4, [__](x0, x1) = x0 + x1, [activate](x0) = x0 + 1, [tt] = 4 orientation: __(__(X,Y),Z) = X + Y + Z >= X + Y + Z = __(X,__(Y,Z)) __(X,nil()) = X + 3 >= X = X __(nil(),X) = X + 3 >= X = X U11(tt()) = 4 >= 4 = U12(tt()) U12(tt()) = 4 >= 4 = tt() isNePal(__(I,__(P,I))) = 2I + P + 4 >= 4 = U11(tt()) activate(X) = X + 1 >= X = X problem: __(__(X,Y),Z) -> __(X,__(Y,Z)) U11(tt()) -> U12(tt()) U12(tt()) -> tt() isNePal(__(I,__(P,I))) -> U11(tt()) Matrix Interpretation Processor: dim=1 interpretation: [U12](x0) = x0, [U11](x0) = x0 + 1, [isNePal](x0) = 2x0 + 2, [__](x0, x1) = x0 + x1, [tt] = 0 orientation: __(__(X,Y),Z) = X + Y + Z >= X + Y + Z = __(X,__(Y,Z)) U11(tt()) = 1 >= 0 = U12(tt()) U12(tt()) = 0 >= 0 = tt() isNePal(__(I,__(P,I))) = 4I + 2P + 2 >= 1 = U11(tt()) problem: __(__(X,Y),Z) -> __(X,__(Y,Z)) U12(tt()) -> tt() Matrix Interpretation Processor: dim=1 interpretation: [U12](x0) = x0 + 1, [__](x0, x1) = x0 + x1, [tt] = 2 orientation: __(__(X,Y),Z) = X + Y + Z >= X + Y + Z = __(X,__(Y,Z)) U12(tt()) = 3 >= 2 = tt() problem: __(__(X,Y),Z) -> __(X,__(Y,Z)) Matrix Interpretation Processor: dim=3 interpretation: [1 0 1] [1 0 0] [1] [__](x0, x1) = [0 0 0]x0 + [0 0 0]x1 + [0] [1 0 0] [0 0 1] [1] orientation: [2 0 1] [1 0 1] [1 0 0] [3] [1 0 1] [1 0 1] [1 0 0] [2] __(__(X,Y),Z) = [0 0 0]X + [0 0 0]Y + [0 0 0]Z + [0] >= [0 0 0]X + [0 0 0]Y + [0 0 0]Z + [0] = __(X,__(Y,Z)) [1 0 1] [1 0 0] [0 0 1] [2] [1 0 0] [1 0 0] [0 0 1] [2] problem: Qed