YES

Prover = TRS(tech=GUIDED_UNF_TRIPLES, nb_unfoldings=unlimited, unfold_variables=false, max_nb_coefficients=12, max_nb_unfolded_rules=-1, strategy=LEFTMOST_NE)

** BEGIN proof argument **
All the DP problems were proved finite.
As all the involved DP processors are sound,
the TRS under analysis terminates.
** END proof argument **

** BEGIN proof description **
## Searching for a generalized rewrite rule
(a rule whose right-hand side contains a variable
that does not occur in the left-hand side)...
No generalized rewrite rule found!

## Applying the DP framework...
## Round 1:
  ## DP problem: 
  Dependency pairs = [D^#(+(_0,_1)) -> D^#(_0), D^#(+(_0,_1)) -> D^#(_1), D^#(*(_0,_1)) -> D^#(_0), D^#(*(_0,_1)) -> D^#(_1), D^#(-(_0,_1)) -> D^#(_0), D^#(-(_0,_1)) -> D^#(_1), D^#(minus(_0)) -> D^#(_0), D^#(div(_0,_1)) -> D^#(_0), D^#(div(_0,_1)) -> D^#(_1), D^#(ln(_0)) -> D^#(_0), D^#(pow(_0,_1)) -> D^#(_0), D^#(pow(_0,_1)) -> D^#(_1)]
  TRS = {D(t) -> 1, D(constant) -> 0, D(+(_0,_1)) -> +(D(_0),D(_1)), D(*(_0,_1)) -> +(*(_1,D(_0)),*(_0,D(_1))), D(-(_0,_1)) -> -(D(_0),D(_1)), D(minus(_0)) -> minus(D(_0)), D(div(_0,_1)) -> -(div(D(_0),_1),div(*(_0,D(_1)),pow(_1,2))), D(ln(_0)) -> div(D(_0),_0), D(pow(_0,_1)) -> +(*(*(_1,pow(_0,-(_1,1))),D(_0)),*(*(pow(_0,_1),ln(_0)),D(_1)))}
    ## Trying with homeomorphic embeddings... Success!
  This DP problem is finite.

** END proof description **

Proof stopped at iteration 0
Number of unfolded rules generated by this proof = 0
Number of unfolded rules generated by all the parallel proofs = 0