YES proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 794c25de1cacf0d048858bcd21c9a779e1221865 marcel 20200619 unpublished dirty Termination of the given RelTRS could be proven: (0) RelTRS (1) RelTRSRRRProof [EQUIVALENT, 32 ms] (2) RelTRS (3) RelTRSRRRProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (4) RelTRS (5) RIsEmptyProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (6) YES ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: Relative term rewrite system: The relative TRS consists of the following R rules: g(x, y) -> x g(x, y) -> y f(s(x), y, y) -> f(y, x, s(x)) The relative TRS consists of the following S rules: rand(x) -> x rand(x) -> rand(s(x)) ---------------------------------------- (1) RelTRSRRRProof (EQUIVALENT) We used the following monotonic ordering for rule removal: Matrix interpretation [MATRO] to (N^2, +, *, >=, >) : <<< POL(g(x_1, x_2)) = [[1], [0]] + [[1, 0], [0, 2]] * x_1 + [[1, 0], [0, 1]] * x_2 >>> <<< POL(f(x_1, x_2, x_3)) = [[0], [0]] + [[2, 0], [0, 0]] * x_1 + [[1, 0], [0, 0]] * x_2 + [[1, 0], [0, 0]] * x_3 >>> <<< POL(s(x_1)) = [[0], [0]] + [[1, 0], [0, 0]] * x_1 >>> <<< POL(rand(x_1)) = [[3], [3]] + [[2, 0], [0, 2]] * x_1 >>> With this ordering the following rules can be removed [MATRO] because they are oriented strictly: Rules from R: g(x, y) -> x g(x, y) -> y Rules from S: rand(x) -> x ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: Relative term rewrite system: The relative TRS consists of the following R rules: f(s(x), y, y) -> f(y, x, s(x)) The relative TRS consists of the following S rules: rand(x) -> rand(s(x)) ---------------------------------------- (3) RelTRSRRRProof (EQUIVALENT) We used the following monotonic ordering for rule removal: Matrix interpretation [MATRO] to (N^2, +, *, >=, >) : <<< POL(f(x_1, x_2, x_3)) = [[0], [0]] + [[1, 1], [0, 1]] * x_1 + [[1, 1], [0, 0]] * x_2 + [[1, 0], [0, 1]] * x_3 >>> <<< POL(s(x_1)) = [[0], [1]] + [[1, 0], [1, 1]] * x_1 >>> <<< POL(rand(x_1)) = [[1], [1]] + [[1, 0], [1, 0]] * x_1 >>> With this ordering the following rules can be removed [MATRO] because they are oriented strictly: Rules from R: f(s(x), y, y) -> f(y, x, s(x)) Rules from S: none ---------------------------------------- (4) Obligation: Relative term rewrite system: R is empty. The relative TRS consists of the following S rules: rand(x) -> rand(s(x)) ---------------------------------------- (5) RIsEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT) The TRS R is empty. Hence, termination is trivially proven. ---------------------------------------- (6) YES