YES
proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml
# AProVE Commit ID: 794c25de1cacf0d048858bcd21c9a779e1221865 marcel 20200619 unpublished dirty


Termination of the given RelTRS could be proven:

(0) RelTRS
(1) RelTRS Reverse [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms]
(2) RelTRS
(3) RelTRSRRRProof [EQUIVALENT, 26 ms]
(4) RelTRS
(5) RIsEmptyProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms]
(6) YES


----------------------------------------

(0)
Obligation:
Relative term rewrite system:
The relative TRS consists of the following R rules:

   f(x) -> x
   g(x) -> x

The relative TRS consists of the following S rules:

   f(x) -> g(x)
   g(x) -> f(x)


----------------------------------------

(1) RelTRS Reverse (EQUIVALENT)
We have reversed the following relative TRS [REVERSE]:
The set of rules R is 
   f(x) -> x
   g(x) -> x

The set of rules S is 
   f(x) -> g(x)
   g(x) -> f(x)

We have obtained the following relative TRS:
The set of rules R is 
   f(x) -> x
   g(x) -> x

The set of rules S is 
   f(x) -> g(x)
   g(x) -> f(x)


----------------------------------------

(2)
Obligation:
Relative term rewrite system:
The relative TRS consists of the following R rules:

   f(x) -> x
   g(x) -> x

The relative TRS consists of the following S rules:

   f(x) -> g(x)
   g(x) -> f(x)


----------------------------------------

(3) RelTRSRRRProof (EQUIVALENT)
We used the following monotonic ordering for rule removal:
Matrix interpretation [MATRO] to (N^2, +, *, >=, >) :

   <<<
 POL(f(x_1)) =  	[[1], [2]] 	 +  	[[1, 2], [1, 2]] 	* 	x_1
>>>

   <<<
 POL(g(x_1)) =  	[[1], [2]] 	 +  	[[1, 2], [1, 2]] 	* 	x_1
>>>

With this ordering the following rules can be removed [MATRO] because they are oriented strictly:
Rules from R:

   f(x) -> x
   g(x) -> x
Rules from S:
none




----------------------------------------

(4)
Obligation:
Relative term rewrite system:
R is empty.
The relative TRS consists of the following S rules:

   f(x) -> g(x)
   g(x) -> f(x)


----------------------------------------

(5) RIsEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT)
The TRS R is empty. Hence, termination is trivially proven.
----------------------------------------

(6)
YES