YES After renaming modulo { a->0, b->1, c->2 }, it remains to prove termination of the 4-rule system { 0 -> , 0 1 -> 0 2 1 1 2 , 1 -> , 2 2 -> 0 } The system was reversed. After renaming modulo { 0->0, 1->1, 2->2 }, it remains to prove termination of the 4-rule system { 0 -> , 1 0 -> 2 1 1 2 0 , 1 -> , 2 2 -> 0 } Applying sparse 2-tiling [Hofbauer/Geser/Waldmann, FSCD 2019]. After renaming modulo { (0,0)->0, (0,1)->1, (0,2)->2, (0,4)->3, (1,0)->4, (1,1)->5, (1,2)->6, (1,4)->7, (2,0)->8, (2,1)->9, (2,2)->10, (2,4)->11, (3,0)->12, (3,1)->13, (3,2)->14, (3,4)->15 }, it remains to prove termination of the 64-rule system { 0 0 -> 0 , 0 1 -> 1 , 0 2 -> 2 , 0 3 -> 3 , 4 0 -> 4 , 4 1 -> 5 , 4 2 -> 6 , 4 3 -> 7 , 8 0 -> 8 , 8 1 -> 9 , 8 2 -> 10 , 8 3 -> 11 , 12 0 -> 12 , 12 1 -> 13 , 12 2 -> 14 , 12 3 -> 15 , 1 4 0 -> 2 9 5 6 8 0 , 1 4 1 -> 2 9 5 6 8 1 , 1 4 2 -> 2 9 5 6 8 2 , 1 4 3 -> 2 9 5 6 8 3 , 5 4 0 -> 6 9 5 6 8 0 , 5 4 1 -> 6 9 5 6 8 1 , 5 4 2 -> 6 9 5 6 8 2 , 5 4 3 -> 6 9 5 6 8 3 , 9 4 0 -> 10 9 5 6 8 0 , 9 4 1 -> 10 9 5 6 8 1 , 9 4 2 -> 10 9 5 6 8 2 , 9 4 3 -> 10 9 5 6 8 3 , 13 4 0 -> 14 9 5 6 8 0 , 13 4 1 -> 14 9 5 6 8 1 , 13 4 2 -> 14 9 5 6 8 2 , 13 4 3 -> 14 9 5 6 8 3 , 1 4 -> 0 , 1 5 -> 1 , 1 6 -> 2 , 1 7 -> 3 , 5 4 -> 4 , 5 5 -> 5 , 5 6 -> 6 , 5 7 -> 7 , 9 4 -> 8 , 9 5 -> 9 , 9 6 -> 10 , 9 7 -> 11 , 13 4 -> 12 , 13 5 -> 13 , 13 6 -> 14 , 13 7 -> 15 , 2 10 8 -> 0 0 , 2 10 9 -> 0 1 , 2 10 10 -> 0 2 , 2 10 11 -> 0 3 , 6 10 8 -> 4 0 , 6 10 9 -> 4 1 , 6 10 10 -> 4 2 , 6 10 11 -> 4 3 , 10 10 8 -> 8 0 , 10 10 9 -> 8 1 , 10 10 10 -> 8 2 , 10 10 11 -> 8 3 , 14 10 8 -> 12 0 , 14 10 9 -> 12 1 , 14 10 10 -> 12 2 , 14 10 11 -> 12 3 } The system was filtered by the following matrix interpretation of type E_J with J = {1,...,2} and dimension 2: 0 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 | | 0 1 | \ / 1 is interpreted by / \ | 1 2 | | 0 1 | \ / 2 is interpreted by / \ | 1 2 | | 0 1 | \ / 3 is interpreted by / \ | 1 1 | | 0 1 | \ / 4 is interpreted by / \ | 1 2 | | 0 1 | \ / 5 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 | | 0 1 | \ / 6 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 | | 0 1 | \ / 7 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 | | 0 1 | \ / 8 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 | | 0 1 | \ / 9 is interpreted by / \ | 1 2 | | 0 1 | \ / 10 is interpreted by / \ | 1 2 | | 0 1 | \ / 11 is interpreted by / \ | 1 1 | | 0 1 | \ / 12 is interpreted by / \ | 1 1 | | 0 1 | \ / 13 is interpreted by / \ | 1 1 | | 0 1 | \ / 14 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 | | 0 1 | \ / 15 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 | | 0 1 | \ / After renaming modulo { 0->0, 1->1, 2->2, 3->3, 4->4, 8->5, 9->6, 10->7, 11->8, 12->9, 5->10, 6->11, 7->12, 13->13 }, it remains to prove termination of the 35-rule system { 0 0 -> 0 , 0 1 -> 1 , 0 2 -> 2 , 0 3 -> 3 , 4 0 -> 4 , 5 0 -> 5 , 5 1 -> 6 , 5 2 -> 7 , 5 3 -> 8 , 9 0 -> 9 , 1 4 0 -> 2 6 10 11 5 0 , 1 4 1 -> 2 6 10 11 5 1 , 1 4 2 -> 2 6 10 11 5 2 , 1 4 3 -> 2 6 10 11 5 3 , 10 4 0 -> 11 6 10 11 5 0 , 10 4 1 -> 11 6 10 11 5 1 , 10 4 2 -> 11 6 10 11 5 2 , 10 4 3 -> 11 6 10 11 5 3 , 6 4 0 -> 7 6 10 11 5 0 , 6 4 1 -> 7 6 10 11 5 1 , 6 4 2 -> 7 6 10 11 5 2 , 6 4 3 -> 7 6 10 11 5 3 , 1 10 -> 1 , 1 11 -> 2 , 10 4 -> 4 , 10 10 -> 10 , 10 11 -> 11 , 10 12 -> 12 , 6 10 -> 6 , 6 11 -> 7 , 13 10 -> 13 , 11 7 5 -> 4 0 , 11 7 6 -> 4 1 , 11 7 7 -> 4 2 , 11 7 8 -> 4 3 } The system was filtered by the following matrix interpretation of type E_J with J = {1,...,2} and dimension 3: 0 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 1 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 2 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 3 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 4 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 5 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 6 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 7 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 8 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 9 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 10 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 1 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 1 0 | \ / 11 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 12 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 13 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / After renaming modulo { 0->0, 1->1, 2->2, 3->3, 4->4, 5->5, 6->6, 7->7, 8->8, 9->9, 10->10, 11->11, 12->12, 13->13 }, it remains to prove termination of the 34-rule system { 0 0 -> 0 , 0 1 -> 1 , 0 2 -> 2 , 0 3 -> 3 , 4 0 -> 4 , 5 0 -> 5 , 5 1 -> 6 , 5 2 -> 7 , 5 3 -> 8 , 9 0 -> 9 , 1 4 0 -> 2 6 10 11 5 0 , 1 4 1 -> 2 6 10 11 5 1 , 1 4 2 -> 2 6 10 11 5 2 , 1 4 3 -> 2 6 10 11 5 3 , 10 4 0 -> 11 6 10 11 5 0 , 10 4 1 -> 11 6 10 11 5 1 , 10 4 2 -> 11 6 10 11 5 2 , 10 4 3 -> 11 6 10 11 5 3 , 6 4 0 -> 7 6 10 11 5 0 , 6 4 1 -> 7 6 10 11 5 1 , 6 4 2 -> 7 6 10 11 5 2 , 6 4 3 -> 7 6 10 11 5 3 , 1 10 -> 1 , 1 11 -> 2 , 10 4 -> 4 , 10 11 -> 11 , 10 12 -> 12 , 6 10 -> 6 , 6 11 -> 7 , 13 10 -> 13 , 11 7 5 -> 4 0 , 11 7 6 -> 4 1 , 11 7 7 -> 4 2 , 11 7 8 -> 4 3 } Applying the dependency pairs transformation. After renaming modulo { (0,true)->0, (0,false)->1, (1,false)->2, (1,true)->3, (4,true)->4, (5,true)->5, (6,true)->6, (9,true)->7, (4,false)->8, (10,false)->9, (11,false)->10, (5,false)->11, (10,true)->12, (11,true)->13, (2,false)->14, (3,false)->15, (6,false)->16, (13,true)->17, (7,false)->18, (8,false)->19, (9,false)->20, (12,false)->21, (13,false)->22 }, it remains to prove termination of the 109-rule system { 0 1 -> 0 , 0 2 -> 3 , 4 1 -> 4 , 5 1 -> 5 , 5 2 -> 6 , 7 1 -> 7 , 3 8 1 -> 6 9 10 11 1 , 3 8 1 -> 12 10 11 1 , 3 8 1 -> 13 11 1 , 3 8 1 -> 5 1 , 3 8 1 -> 0 , 3 8 2 -> 6 9 10 11 2 , 3 8 2 -> 12 10 11 2 , 3 8 2 -> 13 11 2 , 3 8 2 -> 5 2 , 3 8 2 -> 3 , 3 8 14 -> 6 9 10 11 14 , 3 8 14 -> 12 10 11 14 , 3 8 14 -> 13 11 14 , 3 8 14 -> 5 14 , 3 8 15 -> 6 9 10 11 15 , 3 8 15 -> 12 10 11 15 , 3 8 15 -> 13 11 15 , 3 8 15 -> 5 15 , 12 8 1 -> 13 16 9 10 11 1 , 12 8 1 -> 6 9 10 11 1 , 12 8 1 -> 12 10 11 1 , 12 8 1 -> 13 11 1 , 12 8 1 -> 5 1 , 12 8 1 -> 0 , 12 8 2 -> 13 16 9 10 11 2 , 12 8 2 -> 6 9 10 11 2 , 12 8 2 -> 12 10 11 2 , 12 8 2 -> 13 11 2 , 12 8 2 -> 5 2 , 12 8 2 -> 3 , 12 8 14 -> 13 16 9 10 11 14 , 12 8 14 -> 6 9 10 11 14 , 12 8 14 -> 12 10 11 14 , 12 8 14 -> 13 11 14 , 12 8 14 -> 5 14 , 12 8 15 -> 13 16 9 10 11 15 , 12 8 15 -> 6 9 10 11 15 , 12 8 15 -> 12 10 11 15 , 12 8 15 -> 13 11 15 , 12 8 15 -> 5 15 , 6 8 1 -> 6 9 10 11 1 , 6 8 1 -> 12 10 11 1 , 6 8 1 -> 13 11 1 , 6 8 1 -> 5 1 , 6 8 1 -> 0 , 6 8 2 -> 6 9 10 11 2 , 6 8 2 -> 12 10 11 2 , 6 8 2 -> 13 11 2 , 6 8 2 -> 5 2 , 6 8 2 -> 3 , 6 8 14 -> 6 9 10 11 14 , 6 8 14 -> 12 10 11 14 , 6 8 14 -> 13 11 14 , 6 8 14 -> 5 14 , 6 8 15 -> 6 9 10 11 15 , 6 8 15 -> 12 10 11 15 , 6 8 15 -> 13 11 15 , 6 8 15 -> 5 15 , 3 9 -> 3 , 12 8 -> 4 , 12 10 -> 13 , 6 9 -> 6 , 17 9 -> 17 , 13 18 11 -> 4 1 , 13 18 11 -> 0 , 13 18 16 -> 4 2 , 13 18 16 -> 3 , 13 18 18 -> 4 14 , 13 18 19 -> 4 15 , 1 1 ->= 1 , 1 2 ->= 2 , 1 14 ->= 14 , 1 15 ->= 15 , 8 1 ->= 8 , 11 1 ->= 11 , 11 2 ->= 16 , 11 14 ->= 18 , 11 15 ->= 19 , 20 1 ->= 20 , 2 8 1 ->= 14 16 9 10 11 1 , 2 8 2 ->= 14 16 9 10 11 2 , 2 8 14 ->= 14 16 9 10 11 14 , 2 8 15 ->= 14 16 9 10 11 15 , 9 8 1 ->= 10 16 9 10 11 1 , 9 8 2 ->= 10 16 9 10 11 2 , 9 8 14 ->= 10 16 9 10 11 14 , 9 8 15 ->= 10 16 9 10 11 15 , 16 8 1 ->= 18 16 9 10 11 1 , 16 8 2 ->= 18 16 9 10 11 2 , 16 8 14 ->= 18 16 9 10 11 14 , 16 8 15 ->= 18 16 9 10 11 15 , 2 9 ->= 2 , 2 10 ->= 14 , 9 8 ->= 8 , 9 10 ->= 10 , 9 21 ->= 21 , 16 9 ->= 16 , 16 10 ->= 18 , 22 9 ->= 22 , 10 18 11 ->= 8 1 , 10 18 16 ->= 8 2 , 10 18 18 ->= 8 14 , 10 18 19 ->= 8 15 } The system was filtered by the following matrix interpretation of type E_J with J = {1,...,2} and dimension 2: 0 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 | | 0 1 | \ / 1 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 | | 0 1 | \ / 2 is interpreted by / \ | 1 2 | | 0 1 | \ / 3 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 | | 0 1 | \ / 4 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 | | 0 1 | \ / 5 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 | | 0 1 | \ / 6 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 | | 0 1 | \ / 7 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 | | 0 1 | \ / 8 is interpreted by / \ | 1 2 | | 0 1 | \ / 9 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 | | 0 1 | \ / 10 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 | | 0 1 | \ / 11 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 | | 0 1 | \ / 12 is interpreted by / \ | 1 1 | | 0 1 | \ / 13 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 | | 0 1 | \ / 14 is interpreted by / \ | 1 2 | | 0 1 | \ / 15 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 | | 0 1 | \ / 16 is interpreted by / \ | 1 2 | | 0 1 | \ / 17 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 | | 0 1 | \ / 18 is interpreted by / \ | 1 2 | | 0 1 | \ / 19 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 | | 0 1 | \ / 20 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 | | 0 1 | \ / 21 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 | | 0 1 | \ / 22 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 | | 0 1 | \ / After renaming modulo { 0->0, 1->1, 4->2, 5->3, 7->4, 3->5, 9->6, 6->7, 17->8, 2->9, 14->10, 15->11, 8->12, 11->13, 16->14, 18->15, 19->16, 20->17, 10->18, 21->19, 22->20 }, it remains to prove termination of the 41-rule system { 0 1 -> 0 , 2 1 -> 2 , 3 1 -> 3 , 4 1 -> 4 , 5 6 -> 5 , 7 6 -> 7 , 8 6 -> 8 , 1 1 ->= 1 , 1 9 ->= 9 , 1 10 ->= 10 , 1 11 ->= 11 , 12 1 ->= 12 , 13 1 ->= 13 , 13 9 ->= 14 , 13 10 ->= 15 , 13 11 ->= 16 , 17 1 ->= 17 , 9 12 1 ->= 10 14 6 18 13 1 , 9 12 9 ->= 10 14 6 18 13 9 , 9 12 10 ->= 10 14 6 18 13 10 , 9 12 11 ->= 10 14 6 18 13 11 , 6 12 1 ->= 18 14 6 18 13 1 , 6 12 9 ->= 18 14 6 18 13 9 , 6 12 10 ->= 18 14 6 18 13 10 , 6 12 11 ->= 18 14 6 18 13 11 , 14 12 1 ->= 15 14 6 18 13 1 , 14 12 9 ->= 15 14 6 18 13 9 , 14 12 10 ->= 15 14 6 18 13 10 , 14 12 11 ->= 15 14 6 18 13 11 , 9 6 ->= 9 , 9 18 ->= 10 , 6 12 ->= 12 , 6 18 ->= 18 , 6 19 ->= 19 , 14 6 ->= 14 , 14 18 ->= 15 , 20 6 ->= 20 , 18 15 13 ->= 12 1 , 18 15 14 ->= 12 9 , 18 15 15 ->= 12 10 , 18 15 16 ->= 12 11 } The system was filtered by the following matrix interpretation of type E_J with J = {1,...,2} and dimension 3: 0 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 1 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 1 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 1 1 | \ / 2 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 3 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 4 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 5 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 6 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 7 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 8 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 9 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 10 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 11 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 12 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 13 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 14 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 15 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 16 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 17 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 18 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 19 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 20 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / After renaming modulo { 2->0, 1->1, 3->2, 4->3, 5->4, 6->5, 7->6, 8->7, 9->8, 10->9, 11->10, 12->11, 13->12, 14->13, 15->14, 16->15, 17->16, 18->17, 19->18, 20->19 }, it remains to prove termination of the 40-rule system { 0 1 -> 0 , 2 1 -> 2 , 3 1 -> 3 , 4 5 -> 4 , 6 5 -> 6 , 7 5 -> 7 , 1 1 ->= 1 , 1 8 ->= 8 , 1 9 ->= 9 , 1 10 ->= 10 , 11 1 ->= 11 , 12 1 ->= 12 , 12 8 ->= 13 , 12 9 ->= 14 , 12 10 ->= 15 , 16 1 ->= 16 , 8 11 1 ->= 9 13 5 17 12 1 , 8 11 8 ->= 9 13 5 17 12 8 , 8 11 9 ->= 9 13 5 17 12 9 , 8 11 10 ->= 9 13 5 17 12 10 , 5 11 1 ->= 17 13 5 17 12 1 , 5 11 8 ->= 17 13 5 17 12 8 , 5 11 9 ->= 17 13 5 17 12 9 , 5 11 10 ->= 17 13 5 17 12 10 , 13 11 1 ->= 14 13 5 17 12 1 , 13 11 8 ->= 14 13 5 17 12 8 , 13 11 9 ->= 14 13 5 17 12 9 , 13 11 10 ->= 14 13 5 17 12 10 , 8 5 ->= 8 , 8 17 ->= 9 , 5 11 ->= 11 , 5 17 ->= 17 , 5 18 ->= 18 , 13 5 ->= 13 , 13 17 ->= 14 , 19 5 ->= 19 , 17 14 12 ->= 11 1 , 17 14 13 ->= 11 8 , 17 14 14 ->= 11 9 , 17 14 15 ->= 11 10 } The system was filtered by the following matrix interpretation of type E_J with J = {1,...,2} and dimension 3: 0 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 1 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 1 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 1 1 | \ / 2 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 3 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 4 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 5 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 6 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 7 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 8 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 9 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 10 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 11 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 12 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 13 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 14 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 15 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 16 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 17 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 18 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 19 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / After renaming modulo { 2->0, 1->1, 3->2, 4->3, 5->4, 6->5, 7->6, 8->7, 9->8, 10->9, 11->10, 12->11, 13->12, 14->13, 15->14, 16->15, 17->16, 18->17, 19->18 }, it remains to prove termination of the 39-rule system { 0 1 -> 0 , 2 1 -> 2 , 3 4 -> 3 , 5 4 -> 5 , 6 4 -> 6 , 1 1 ->= 1 , 1 7 ->= 7 , 1 8 ->= 8 , 1 9 ->= 9 , 10 1 ->= 10 , 11 1 ->= 11 , 11 7 ->= 12 , 11 8 ->= 13 , 11 9 ->= 14 , 15 1 ->= 15 , 7 10 1 ->= 8 12 4 16 11 1 , 7 10 7 ->= 8 12 4 16 11 7 , 7 10 8 ->= 8 12 4 16 11 8 , 7 10 9 ->= 8 12 4 16 11 9 , 4 10 1 ->= 16 12 4 16 11 1 , 4 10 7 ->= 16 12 4 16 11 7 , 4 10 8 ->= 16 12 4 16 11 8 , 4 10 9 ->= 16 12 4 16 11 9 , 12 10 1 ->= 13 12 4 16 11 1 , 12 10 7 ->= 13 12 4 16 11 7 , 12 10 8 ->= 13 12 4 16 11 8 , 12 10 9 ->= 13 12 4 16 11 9 , 7 4 ->= 7 , 7 16 ->= 8 , 4 10 ->= 10 , 4 16 ->= 16 , 4 17 ->= 17 , 12 4 ->= 12 , 12 16 ->= 13 , 18 4 ->= 18 , 16 13 11 ->= 10 1 , 16 13 12 ->= 10 7 , 16 13 13 ->= 10 8 , 16 13 14 ->= 10 9 } The system was filtered by the following matrix interpretation of type E_J with J = {1,...,2} and dimension 3: 0 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 1 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 1 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 1 1 | \ / 2 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 3 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 4 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 5 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 6 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 7 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 8 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 9 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 10 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 11 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 12 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 13 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 14 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 15 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 16 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 17 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 18 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / After renaming modulo { 2->0, 1->1, 3->2, 4->3, 5->4, 6->5, 7->6, 8->7, 9->8, 10->9, 11->10, 12->11, 13->12, 14->13, 15->14, 16->15, 17->16, 18->17 }, it remains to prove termination of the 38-rule system { 0 1 -> 0 , 2 3 -> 2 , 4 3 -> 4 , 5 3 -> 5 , 1 1 ->= 1 , 1 6 ->= 6 , 1 7 ->= 7 , 1 8 ->= 8 , 9 1 ->= 9 , 10 1 ->= 10 , 10 6 ->= 11 , 10 7 ->= 12 , 10 8 ->= 13 , 14 1 ->= 14 , 6 9 1 ->= 7 11 3 15 10 1 , 6 9 6 ->= 7 11 3 15 10 6 , 6 9 7 ->= 7 11 3 15 10 7 , 6 9 8 ->= 7 11 3 15 10 8 , 3 9 1 ->= 15 11 3 15 10 1 , 3 9 6 ->= 15 11 3 15 10 6 , 3 9 7 ->= 15 11 3 15 10 7 , 3 9 8 ->= 15 11 3 15 10 8 , 11 9 1 ->= 12 11 3 15 10 1 , 11 9 6 ->= 12 11 3 15 10 6 , 11 9 7 ->= 12 11 3 15 10 7 , 11 9 8 ->= 12 11 3 15 10 8 , 6 3 ->= 6 , 6 15 ->= 7 , 3 9 ->= 9 , 3 15 ->= 15 , 3 16 ->= 16 , 11 3 ->= 11 , 11 15 ->= 12 , 17 3 ->= 17 , 15 12 10 ->= 9 1 , 15 12 11 ->= 9 6 , 15 12 12 ->= 9 7 , 15 12 13 ->= 9 8 } The system was filtered by the following matrix interpretation of type E_J with J = {1,...,2} and dimension 3: 0 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 1 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 1 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 1 1 | \ / 2 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 3 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 4 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 5 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 6 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 7 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 8 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 9 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 10 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 11 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 12 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 13 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 14 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 15 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 16 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 17 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / After renaming modulo { 2->0, 3->1, 4->2, 5->3, 1->4, 6->5, 7->6, 8->7, 9->8, 10->9, 11->10, 12->11, 13->12, 14->13, 15->14, 16->15, 17->16 }, it remains to prove termination of the 37-rule system { 0 1 -> 0 , 2 1 -> 2 , 3 1 -> 3 , 4 4 ->= 4 , 4 5 ->= 5 , 4 6 ->= 6 , 4 7 ->= 7 , 8 4 ->= 8 , 9 4 ->= 9 , 9 5 ->= 10 , 9 6 ->= 11 , 9 7 ->= 12 , 13 4 ->= 13 , 5 8 4 ->= 6 10 1 14 9 4 , 5 8 5 ->= 6 10 1 14 9 5 , 5 8 6 ->= 6 10 1 14 9 6 , 5 8 7 ->= 6 10 1 14 9 7 , 1 8 4 ->= 14 10 1 14 9 4 , 1 8 5 ->= 14 10 1 14 9 5 , 1 8 6 ->= 14 10 1 14 9 6 , 1 8 7 ->= 14 10 1 14 9 7 , 10 8 4 ->= 11 10 1 14 9 4 , 10 8 5 ->= 11 10 1 14 9 5 , 10 8 6 ->= 11 10 1 14 9 6 , 10 8 7 ->= 11 10 1 14 9 7 , 5 1 ->= 5 , 5 14 ->= 6 , 1 8 ->= 8 , 1 14 ->= 14 , 1 15 ->= 15 , 10 1 ->= 10 , 10 14 ->= 11 , 16 1 ->= 16 , 14 11 9 ->= 8 4 , 14 11 10 ->= 8 5 , 14 11 11 ->= 8 6 , 14 11 12 ->= 8 7 } The system was filtered by the following matrix interpretation of type E_J with J = {1,...,2} and dimension 3: 0 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 1 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 1 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 1 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 1 0 | \ / 2 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 3 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 4 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 5 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 6 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 7 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 8 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 9 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 10 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 11 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 12 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 13 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 14 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 15 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 16 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / After renaming modulo { 2->0, 1->1, 3->2, 4->3, 5->4, 6->5, 7->6, 8->7, 9->8, 10->9, 11->10, 12->11, 13->12, 14->13, 15->14, 16->15 }, it remains to prove termination of the 36-rule system { 0 1 -> 0 , 2 1 -> 2 , 3 3 ->= 3 , 3 4 ->= 4 , 3 5 ->= 5 , 3 6 ->= 6 , 7 3 ->= 7 , 8 3 ->= 8 , 8 4 ->= 9 , 8 5 ->= 10 , 8 6 ->= 11 , 12 3 ->= 12 , 4 7 3 ->= 5 9 1 13 8 3 , 4 7 4 ->= 5 9 1 13 8 4 , 4 7 5 ->= 5 9 1 13 8 5 , 4 7 6 ->= 5 9 1 13 8 6 , 1 7 3 ->= 13 9 1 13 8 3 , 1 7 4 ->= 13 9 1 13 8 4 , 1 7 5 ->= 13 9 1 13 8 5 , 1 7 6 ->= 13 9 1 13 8 6 , 9 7 3 ->= 10 9 1 13 8 3 , 9 7 4 ->= 10 9 1 13 8 4 , 9 7 5 ->= 10 9 1 13 8 5 , 9 7 6 ->= 10 9 1 13 8 6 , 4 1 ->= 4 , 4 13 ->= 5 , 1 7 ->= 7 , 1 13 ->= 13 , 1 14 ->= 14 , 9 1 ->= 9 , 9 13 ->= 10 , 15 1 ->= 15 , 13 10 8 ->= 7 3 , 13 10 9 ->= 7 4 , 13 10 10 ->= 7 5 , 13 10 11 ->= 7 6 } The system was filtered by the following matrix interpretation of type E_J with J = {1,...,2} and dimension 3: 0 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 1 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 1 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 1 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 1 0 | \ / 2 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 3 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 4 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 5 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 6 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 7 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 8 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 9 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 10 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 11 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 12 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 13 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 14 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 15 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / After renaming modulo { 2->0, 1->1, 3->2, 4->3, 5->4, 6->5, 7->6, 8->7, 9->8, 10->9, 11->10, 12->11, 13->12, 14->13, 15->14 }, it remains to prove termination of the 35-rule system { 0 1 -> 0 , 2 2 ->= 2 , 2 3 ->= 3 , 2 4 ->= 4 , 2 5 ->= 5 , 6 2 ->= 6 , 7 2 ->= 7 , 7 3 ->= 8 , 7 4 ->= 9 , 7 5 ->= 10 , 11 2 ->= 11 , 3 6 2 ->= 4 8 1 12 7 2 , 3 6 3 ->= 4 8 1 12 7 3 , 3 6 4 ->= 4 8 1 12 7 4 , 3 6 5 ->= 4 8 1 12 7 5 , 1 6 2 ->= 12 8 1 12 7 2 , 1 6 3 ->= 12 8 1 12 7 3 , 1 6 4 ->= 12 8 1 12 7 4 , 1 6 5 ->= 12 8 1 12 7 5 , 8 6 2 ->= 9 8 1 12 7 2 , 8 6 3 ->= 9 8 1 12 7 3 , 8 6 4 ->= 9 8 1 12 7 4 , 8 6 5 ->= 9 8 1 12 7 5 , 3 1 ->= 3 , 3 12 ->= 4 , 1 6 ->= 6 , 1 12 ->= 12 , 1 13 ->= 13 , 8 1 ->= 8 , 8 12 ->= 9 , 14 1 ->= 14 , 12 9 7 ->= 6 2 , 12 9 8 ->= 6 3 , 12 9 9 ->= 6 4 , 12 9 10 ->= 6 5 } The system was filtered by the following matrix interpretation of type E_J with J = {1,...,2} and dimension 3: 0 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 1 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 1 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 1 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 1 0 | \ / 2 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 3 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 4 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 5 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 6 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 7 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 8 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 9 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 10 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 11 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 12 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 13 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 14 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / After renaming modulo { 2->0, 3->1, 4->2, 5->3, 6->4, 7->5, 8->6, 9->7, 10->8, 11->9, 1->10, 12->11, 13->12, 14->13 }, it remains to prove termination of the 34-rule system { 0 0 ->= 0 , 0 1 ->= 1 , 0 2 ->= 2 , 0 3 ->= 3 , 4 0 ->= 4 , 5 0 ->= 5 , 5 1 ->= 6 , 5 2 ->= 7 , 5 3 ->= 8 , 9 0 ->= 9 , 1 4 0 ->= 2 6 10 11 5 0 , 1 4 1 ->= 2 6 10 11 5 1 , 1 4 2 ->= 2 6 10 11 5 2 , 1 4 3 ->= 2 6 10 11 5 3 , 10 4 0 ->= 11 6 10 11 5 0 , 10 4 1 ->= 11 6 10 11 5 1 , 10 4 2 ->= 11 6 10 11 5 2 , 10 4 3 ->= 11 6 10 11 5 3 , 6 4 0 ->= 7 6 10 11 5 0 , 6 4 1 ->= 7 6 10 11 5 1 , 6 4 2 ->= 7 6 10 11 5 2 , 6 4 3 ->= 7 6 10 11 5 3 , 1 10 ->= 1 , 1 11 ->= 2 , 10 4 ->= 4 , 10 11 ->= 11 , 10 12 ->= 12 , 6 10 ->= 6 , 6 11 ->= 7 , 13 10 ->= 13 , 11 7 5 ->= 4 0 , 11 7 6 ->= 4 1 , 11 7 7 ->= 4 2 , 11 7 8 ->= 4 3 } The system is trivially terminating.