NO
proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml
# AProVE Commit ID: 794c25de1cacf0d048858bcd21c9a779e1221865 marcel 20200619 unpublished dirty


Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be disproven:

(0) QTRS
(1) NonTerminationProof [COMPLETE, 403 ms]
(2) NO


----------------------------------------

(0)
Obligation:
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

   a(x1) -> x1
   a(b(x1)) -> b(b(a(c(a(x1)))))
   b(x1) -> x1
   c(a(c(x1))) -> x1

Q is empty.

----------------------------------------

(1) NonTerminationProof (COMPLETE)
We used the non-termination processor [OPPELT08] to show that the SRS problem is infinite.

Found the self-embedding DerivationStructure: 
"a b b b c b b -> a b b b c b b a c a"
a b b b c b b -> a b b b c b b a c a
by OverlapClosure OC 2"a b b b c b -> a b b b c a
by OverlapClosure OC 2"a b b -> a a
by OverlapClosure OC 3"a b b -> a c a c a
by OverlapClosure OC 2"a b -> a c a
by OverlapClosure OC 3"a b -> b a c a
by OverlapClosure OC 3"a b -> b b a c a
by original rule (OC 1)""b -> 
by original rule (OC 1)"""b -> 
by original rule (OC 1)"""a b -> a c a
by OverlapClosure OC 3"a b -> b a c a
by OverlapClosure OC 3"a b -> b b a c a
by original rule (OC 1)""b -> 
by original rule (OC 1)"""b -> 
by original rule (OC 1)""""c a c -> 
by original rule (OC 1)"""a b c b -> b b b c a
by OverlapClosure OC 2"a b c -> b b a
by OverlapClosure OC 2"a b -> b b a c a
by original rule (OC 1)""c a c -> 
by original rule (OC 1)"""a b -> b c a
by OverlapClosure OC 3"a b -> b b c a
by OverlapClosure OC 3"a b -> b b a c a
by original rule (OC 1)""a -> 
by original rule (OC 1)"""b -> 
by original rule (OC 1)"""""a b -> b b a c a
by original rule (OC 1)"

----------------------------------------

(2)
NO