YES proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 794c25de1cacf0d048858bcd21c9a779e1221865 marcel 20200619 unpublished dirty Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven: (0) QTRS (1) QTRS Reverse [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (2) QTRS (3) DependencyPairsProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (4) QDP (5) QDPOrderProof [EQUIVALENT, 120 ms] (6) QDP (7) QDPOrderProof [EQUIVALENT, 51 ms] (8) QDP (9) QDPOrderProof [EQUIVALENT, 19 ms] (10) QDP (11) DependencyGraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (12) TRUE ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: Q restricted rewrite system: The TRS R consists of the following rules: a(a(x1)) -> b(x1) a(b(x1)) -> c(c(x1)) b(c(x1)) -> b(a(a(x1))) Q is empty. ---------------------------------------- (1) QTRS Reverse (EQUIVALENT) We applied the QTRS Reverse Processor [REVERSE]. ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: Q restricted rewrite system: The TRS R consists of the following rules: a(a(x1)) -> b(x1) b(a(x1)) -> c(c(x1)) c(b(x1)) -> a(a(b(x1))) Q is empty. ---------------------------------------- (3) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT) Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem. ---------------------------------------- (4) Obligation: Q DP problem: The TRS P consists of the following rules: A(a(x1)) -> B(x1) B(a(x1)) -> C(c(x1)) B(a(x1)) -> C(x1) C(b(x1)) -> A(a(b(x1))) C(b(x1)) -> A(b(x1)) The TRS R consists of the following rules: a(a(x1)) -> b(x1) b(a(x1)) -> c(c(x1)) c(b(x1)) -> a(a(b(x1))) Q is empty. We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains. ---------------------------------------- (5) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT) We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04,JAR06]. The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted. B(a(x1)) -> C(x1) The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly. Used ordering: Matrix interpretation [MATRO] with arctic natural numbers [ARCTIC]: <<< POL(A(x_1)) = [[-I]] + [[0A, 0A, -I]] * x_1 >>> <<< POL(a(x_1)) = [[-I], [-I], [0A]] + [[0A, 0A, 0A], [0A, 0A, -I], [1A, 1A, 0A]] * x_1 >>> <<< POL(B(x_1)) = [[-I]] + [[0A, -I, 0A]] * x_1 >>> <<< POL(C(x_1)) = [[-I]] + [[0A, -I, -I]] * x_1 >>> <<< POL(c(x_1)) = [[0A], [-I], [0A]] + [[0A, 1A, 0A], [0A, -I, -I], [0A, 1A, 0A]] * x_1 >>> <<< POL(b(x_1)) = [[-I], [-I], [-I]] + [[0A, 0A, 0A], [0A, 0A, 0A], [0A, 0A, 0A]] * x_1 >>> The following usable rules [FROCOS05] with respect to the argument filtering of the ordering [JAR06] were oriented: b(a(x1)) -> c(c(x1)) c(b(x1)) -> a(a(b(x1))) a(a(x1)) -> b(x1) ---------------------------------------- (6) Obligation: Q DP problem: The TRS P consists of the following rules: A(a(x1)) -> B(x1) B(a(x1)) -> C(c(x1)) C(b(x1)) -> A(a(b(x1))) C(b(x1)) -> A(b(x1)) The TRS R consists of the following rules: a(a(x1)) -> b(x1) b(a(x1)) -> c(c(x1)) c(b(x1)) -> a(a(b(x1))) Q is empty. We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains. ---------------------------------------- (7) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT) We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04,JAR06]. The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted. C(b(x1)) -> A(b(x1)) The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly. Used ordering: Matrix interpretation [MATRO] with arctic natural numbers [ARCTIC]: <<< POL(A(x_1)) = [[0A]] + [[-I, 0A, -I]] * x_1 >>> <<< POL(a(x_1)) = [[0A], [1A], [0A]] + [[0A, 0A, 1A], [0A, -I, 0A], [-I, 0A, 0A]] * x_1 >>> <<< POL(B(x_1)) = [[1A]] + [[0A, -I, -I]] * x_1 >>> <<< POL(C(x_1)) = [[1A]] + [[0A, 0A, 0A]] * x_1 >>> <<< POL(c(x_1)) = [[1A], [1A], [1A]] + [[0A, 0A, 0A], [0A, 0A, 0A], [0A, 0A, 0A]] * x_1 >>> <<< POL(b(x_1)) = [[-I], [0A], [0A]] + [[0A, 1A, 1A], [-I, 0A, 0A], [-I, 0A, 0A]] * x_1 >>> The following usable rules [FROCOS05] with respect to the argument filtering of the ordering [JAR06] were oriented: b(a(x1)) -> c(c(x1)) c(b(x1)) -> a(a(b(x1))) a(a(x1)) -> b(x1) ---------------------------------------- (8) Obligation: Q DP problem: The TRS P consists of the following rules: A(a(x1)) -> B(x1) B(a(x1)) -> C(c(x1)) C(b(x1)) -> A(a(b(x1))) The TRS R consists of the following rules: a(a(x1)) -> b(x1) b(a(x1)) -> c(c(x1)) c(b(x1)) -> a(a(b(x1))) Q is empty. We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains. ---------------------------------------- (9) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT) We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04,JAR06]. The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted. B(a(x1)) -> C(c(x1)) The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly. Used ordering: Matrix interpretation [MATRO] with arctic natural numbers [ARCTIC]: <<< POL(A(x_1)) = [[0A]] + [[0A, 0A, 0A]] * x_1 >>> <<< POL(a(x_1)) = [[0A], [0A], [0A]] + [[0A, 1A, 0A], [0A, 0A, 0A], [0A, 0A, 0A]] * x_1 >>> <<< POL(B(x_1)) = [[0A]] + [[0A, 1A, 0A]] * x_1 >>> <<< POL(C(x_1)) = [[0A]] + [[-I, 0A, 0A]] * x_1 >>> <<< POL(c(x_1)) = [[0A], [0A], [-I]] + [[0A, 1A, 1A], [-I, 0A, 0A], [0A, 0A, -I]] * x_1 >>> <<< POL(b(x_1)) = [[0A], [-I], [0A]] + [[0A, 1A, 0A], [-I, 0A, -I], [0A, 1A, 0A]] * x_1 >>> The following usable rules [FROCOS05] with respect to the argument filtering of the ordering [JAR06] were oriented: b(a(x1)) -> c(c(x1)) c(b(x1)) -> a(a(b(x1))) a(a(x1)) -> b(x1) ---------------------------------------- (10) Obligation: Q DP problem: The TRS P consists of the following rules: A(a(x1)) -> B(x1) C(b(x1)) -> A(a(b(x1))) The TRS R consists of the following rules: a(a(x1)) -> b(x1) b(a(x1)) -> c(c(x1)) c(b(x1)) -> a(a(b(x1))) Q is empty. We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains. ---------------------------------------- (11) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT) The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 0 SCCs with 2 less nodes. ---------------------------------------- (12) TRUE