NO
proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml
# AProVE Commit ID: 794c25de1cacf0d048858bcd21c9a779e1221865 marcel 20200619 unpublished dirty


Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be disproven:

(0) QTRS
(1) NonTerminationProof [COMPLETE, 40.6 s]
(2) NO


----------------------------------------

(0)
Obligation:
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

   a(a(x1)) -> a(b(x1))
   b(b(c(x1))) -> c(c(a(a(a(x1)))))

Q is empty.

----------------------------------------

(1) NonTerminationProof (COMPLETE)
We used the non-termination processor [OPPELT08] to show that the SRS problem is infinite.

Found the self-embedding DerivationStructure: 
"b b c a b c c a c c -> c c a c c a c c a a c c a b b c a b c c a c c a a a"
b b c a b c c a c c -> c c a c c a c c a a c c a b b c a b c c a c c a a a
by OverlapClosure OC 2"b b c a b c c a c -> c c a c c a c c a a c c a b b c a b c c a b b
by OverlapClosure OC 2"b b c a b c c a -> c c a c c a c c a a c c a b b c a b b b
by OverlapClosure OC 3"b b c a b c c a -> c c a c c a c c a a c c a a b c a b b b
by OverlapClosure OC 3"b b c a b c c a -> c c a c c a c c a a c c a a a c a b b b
by OverlapClosure OC 3"b b c a b c c a -> c c a c c a c c a a b b c c a b b b
by OverlapClosure OC 2"b b c a b c -> c c a c c a c c a a b b b b
by OverlapClosure OC 3"b b c a b c -> c c a c c a c c a a a b b b
by OverlapClosure OC 3"b b c a b c -> c c a c c a c c a a a a b b
by OverlapClosure OC 3"b b c a b c -> c c a c c a b b c a b b
by OverlapClosure OC 3"b b c a b c -> c c a c c a a b c a b b
by OverlapClosure OC 3"b b c a b c -> c c a c c a a a c a b b
by OverlapClosure OC 3"b b c a b c -> c c a b b c c a b b
by OverlapClosure OC 2"b b c a -> c c a b b b
by OverlapClosure OC 3"b b c a -> c c a a b b
by OverlapClosure OC 3"b b c a -> c c a a a b
by OverlapClosure OC 2"b b c -> c c a a a
by original rule (OC 1)""a a -> a b
by original rule (OC 1)"""a a -> a b
by original rule (OC 1)"""a a -> a b
by original rule (OC 1)"""b b c -> c c a b b
by OverlapClosure OC 3"b b c -> c c a a b
by OverlapClosure OC 2"b b c -> c c a a a
by original rule (OC 1)""a a -> a b
by original rule (OC 1)"""a a -> a b
by original rule (OC 1)""""b b c -> c c a a a
by original rule (OC 1)"""a a -> a b
by original rule (OC 1)"""a a -> a b
by original rule (OC 1)"""b b c -> c c a a a
by original rule (OC 1)"""a a -> a b
by original rule (OC 1)"""a a -> a b
by original rule (OC 1)"""b b c a -> c c a b b b
by OverlapClosure OC 3"b b c a -> c c a a b b
by OverlapClosure OC 3"b b c a -> c c a a a b
by OverlapClosure OC 2"b b c -> c c a a a
by original rule (OC 1)""a a -> a b
by original rule (OC 1)"""a a -> a b
by original rule (OC 1)"""a a -> a b
by original rule (OC 1)""""b b c -> c c a a a
by original rule (OC 1)"""a a -> a b
by original rule (OC 1)"""a a -> a b
by original rule (OC 1)"""b b c -> c c a b b
by OverlapClosure OC 3"b b c -> c c a a b
by OverlapClosure OC 2"b b c -> c c a a a
by original rule (OC 1)""a a -> a b
by original rule (OC 1)"""a a -> a b
by original rule (OC 1)""""b b c -> c c a a a
by original rule (OC 1)"

----------------------------------------

(2)
NO