NO
proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml
# AProVE Commit ID: 794c25de1cacf0d048858bcd21c9a779e1221865 marcel 20200619 unpublished dirty


Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be disproven:

(0) QTRS
(1) NonTerminationProof [COMPLETE, 460 ms]
(2) NO


----------------------------------------

(0)
Obligation:
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

   a(a(x1)) -> b(x1)
   a(b(x1)) -> c(a(x1))
   c(c(x1)) -> b(a(b(x1)))

Q is empty.

----------------------------------------

(1) NonTerminationProof (COMPLETE)
We used the non-termination processor [OPPELT08] to show that the SRS problem is infinite.

Found the self-embedding DerivationStructure: 
"a b b b b a b b -> b a b b b b a b b b a"
a b b b b a b b -> b a b b b b a b b b a
by OverlapClosure OC 2"a b b -> b a b a
by OverlapClosure OC 3"a b b -> c c a
by OverlapClosure OC 2"a b -> c a
by original rule (OC 1)""a b -> c a
by original rule (OC 1)"""c c -> b a b
by original rule (OC 1)"""a b b a b b -> b b b a b b b a
by OverlapClosure OC 3"a b b a b b -> b b c c b b a
by OverlapClosure OC 3"a b b a b b -> b b c c a a b a
by OverlapClosure OC 3"a b b a b b -> b b c a b a b a
by OverlapClosure OC 2"a b b a -> b b c a a
by OverlapClosure OC 3"a b b a -> b c c a
by OverlapClosure OC 2"a b b a -> b c a b
by OverlapClosure OC 2"a b b -> b c a a
by OverlapClosure OC 3"a b b -> c c a
by OverlapClosure OC 2"a b -> c a
by original rule (OC 1)""a b -> c a
by original rule (OC 1)"""c c -> b c a
by OverlapClosure OC 2"c c -> b a b
by original rule (OC 1)""a b -> c a
by original rule (OC 1)""""a a -> b
by original rule (OC 1)"""a b -> c a
by original rule (OC 1)"""c c -> b c a
by OverlapClosure OC 2"c c -> b a b
by original rule (OC 1)""a b -> c a
by original rule (OC 1)""""a b b -> b a b a
by OverlapClosure OC 3"a b b -> c c a
by OverlapClosure OC 2"a b -> c a
by original rule (OC 1)""a b -> c a
by original rule (OC 1)"""c c -> b a b
by original rule (OC 1)""""a b -> c a
by original rule (OC 1)"""a a -> b
by original rule (OC 1)"""c c -> b a b
by original rule (OC 1)""

----------------------------------------

(2)
NO