NO proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 794c25de1cacf0d048858bcd21c9a779e1221865 marcel 20200619 unpublished dirty Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be disproven: (0) QTRS (1) NonTerminationProof [COMPLETE, 1089 ms] (2) NO ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: Q restricted rewrite system: The TRS R consists of the following rules: a(a(x1)) -> b(a(b(c(c(x1))))) c(a(x1)) -> x1 c(b(x1)) -> a(x1) Q is empty. ---------------------------------------- (1) NonTerminationProof (COMPLETE) We used the non-termination processor [OPPELT08] to show that the SRS problem is infinite. Found the self-embedding DerivationStructure: "a a b a b a b a a b -> b a b b a b a a b a b a b a a b c c" a a b a b a b a a b -> b a b b a b a a b a b a b a a b c c by OverlapClosure OC 3"a a b a b a b a a b -> b a b b a b a a b a b a b c b a b c c by OverlapClosure OC 2"a a b a b a b a a b -> b a b b a b a a b a b a b c a a by OverlapClosure OC 3"a a b a b a b a a b -> b a b b a b a a b a b a b c c b a by OverlapClosure OC 3"a a b a b a b a a b -> b a b b a b a a b a a a b a by OverlapClosure OC 3"a a b a b a b a a b -> b a b b a b a a b a c b a b a by OverlapClosure OC 2"a a b a b a -> b a b b a b a a b a c c by OverlapClosure OC 3"a a b a b a -> b a b a a b a a b c c by OverlapClosure OC 3"a a b a b a -> b a b c b a b a a b c c by OverlapClosure OC 2"a a -> b a b c c by original rule (OC 1)""c b a b a -> b a b a a b c c by OverlapClosure OC 3"c b a b a -> b a b c b a b c c by OverlapClosure OC 2"c b -> a by original rule (OC 1)""a a b a -> b a b c b a b c c by OverlapClosure OC 2"a a -> b a b c c by original rule (OC 1)""c b a -> b a b c c by OverlapClosure OC 2"c b -> a by original rule (OC 1)""a a -> b a b c c by original rule (OC 1)"""""c b -> a by original rule (OC 1)""""c b -> a by original rule (OC 1)"""a a b a a b -> b a b a a b a by OverlapClosure OC 3"a a b a a b -> b a b c b a b a by OverlapClosure OC 2"a a -> b a b c c by original rule (OC 1)""c b a a b -> b a b a by OverlapClosure OC 2"c b -> a by original rule (OC 1)""a a a b -> b a b a by OverlapClosure OC 2"a a a -> b a b c by OverlapClosure OC 2"a a -> b a b c c by original rule (OC 1)""c a -> by original rule (OC 1)"""c b -> a by original rule (OC 1)"""""c b -> a by original rule (OC 1)""""c b a a b -> b a b a by OverlapClosure OC 2"c b -> a by original rule (OC 1)""a a a b -> b a b a by OverlapClosure OC 2"a a a -> b a b c by OverlapClosure OC 2"a a -> b a b c c by original rule (OC 1)""c a -> by original rule (OC 1)"""c b -> a by original rule (OC 1)"""""c b -> a by original rule (OC 1)"""a a -> b a b c c by original rule (OC 1)"""c b -> a by original rule (OC 1)"""a a -> b a b c c by original rule (OC 1)"""c b -> a by original rule (OC 1)" ---------------------------------------- (2) NO