YES

After renaming modulo { 5->0, 0->1, 4->2, 2->3, 1->4, 3->5 }, 
it remains to prove termination of the 21-rule system
{ 0 0 -> 1 0 2 1 3 0 2 0 3 4 ,
  0 0 -> 5 2 4 4 4 4 2 2 1 2 ,
  3 0 0 -> 2 3 0 2 2 1 1 4 4 3 ,
  0 3 2 -> 1 0 1 3 5 5 2 3 2 3 ,
  0 0 3 -> 1 4 5 3 5 1 5 3 0 5 ,
  0 0 5 -> 1 5 0 2 2 4 1 4 0 1 ,
  0 0 0 -> 0 5 2 4 1 4 2 0 1 1 ,
  3 0 1 2 -> 2 2 5 3 2 2 0 4 1 1 ,
  2 0 3 2 -> 2 4 0 0 3 1 5 4 5 5 ,
  2 0 0 0 -> 4 0 4 3 1 5 3 4 1 0 ,
  1 3 0 5 2 -> 5 3 2 5 4 0 4 4 5 2 ,
  3 0 0 5 2 -> 2 0 2 5 4 2 1 3 2 2 ,
  0 0 0 4 2 -> 5 5 1 0 1 2 5 2 2 1 ,
  1 2 2 0 0 0 -> 1 2 2 2 5 5 2 4 5 4 ,
  4 3 2 0 3 2 -> 5 5 0 5 1 2 1 5 4 5 ,
  2 4 0 0 1 2 -> 4 1 5 1 2 3 2 2 5 2 ,
  2 3 0 0 4 0 -> 3 5 2 3 4 4 5 2 3 0 ,
  0 3 0 0 1 2 -> 1 2 3 5 5 0 3 4 2 2 ,
  0 0 3 2 0 1 -> 3 4 4 2 3 2 1 2 3 1 ,
  1 4 0 0 0 5 0 -> 0 5 3 0 4 1 4 3 1 0 ,
  2 2 0 3 2 3 3 -> 2 1 0 0 2 0 4 3 3 4 }


The system was filtered by the following matrix interpretation
of type E_J with J = {1,...,2} and dimension 4:

0 is interpreted by
 /       \
| 1 0 1 0 |
| 0 1 0 0 |
| 0 0 0 1 |
| 0 1 0 0 |
 \       /
1 is interpreted by
 /       \
| 1 0 0 0 |
| 0 1 0 0 |
| 0 0 0 0 |
| 0 1 0 0 |
 \       /
2 is interpreted by
 /       \
| 1 0 0 0 |
| 0 1 0 0 |
| 0 0 0 0 |
| 0 0 0 0 |
 \       /
3 is interpreted by
 /       \
| 1 0 0 0 |
| 0 1 0 0 |
| 0 0 0 0 |
| 0 0 0 0 |
 \       /
4 is interpreted by
 /       \
| 1 0 0 0 |
| 0 1 0 0 |
| 0 0 0 0 |
| 0 0 0 0 |
 \       /
5 is interpreted by
 /       \
| 1 0 0 0 |
| 0 1 0 0 |
| 0 0 0 0 |
| 0 0 0 0 |
 \       /

After renaming modulo { 0->0, 1->1, 2->2, 3->3, 4->4, 5->5 }, 
it remains to prove termination of the 14-rule system
{ 0 0 -> 1 0 2 1 3 0 2 0 3 4 ,
  0 0 -> 5 2 4 4 4 4 2 2 1 2 ,
  3 0 0 -> 2 3 0 2 2 1 1 4 4 3 ,
  0 3 2 -> 1 0 1 3 5 5 2 3 2 3 ,
  0 0 3 -> 1 4 5 3 5 1 5 3 0 5 ,
  0 0 5 -> 1 5 0 2 2 4 1 4 0 1 ,
  3 0 1 2 -> 2 2 5 3 2 2 0 4 1 1 ,
  2 0 3 2 -> 2 4 0 0 3 1 5 4 5 5 ,
  1 3 0 5 2 -> 5 3 2 5 4 0 4 4 5 2 ,
  3 0 0 5 2 -> 2 0 2 5 4 2 1 3 2 2 ,
  4 3 2 0 3 2 -> 5 5 0 5 1 2 1 5 4 5 ,
  2 3 0 0 4 0 -> 3 5 2 3 4 4 5 2 3 0 ,
  0 0 3 2 0 1 -> 3 4 4 2 3 2 1 2 3 1 ,
  2 2 0 3 2 3 3 -> 2 1 0 0 2 0 4 3 3 4 }


The system was filtered by the following matrix interpretation
of type E_J with J = {1,...,2} and dimension 4:

0 is interpreted by
 /       \
| 1 0 1 0 |
| 0 1 0 0 |
| 0 0 0 0 |
| 1 0 0 0 |
 \       /
1 is interpreted by
 /       \
| 1 0 0 0 |
| 0 1 0 0 |
| 0 0 0 0 |
| 0 0 0 0 |
 \       /
2 is interpreted by
 /       \
| 1 0 0 0 |
| 0 1 0 0 |
| 0 0 0 0 |
| 0 1 0 0 |
 \       /
3 is interpreted by
 /       \
| 1 0 0 0 |
| 0 1 0 0 |
| 0 0 0 1 |
| 0 1 0 0 |
 \       /
4 is interpreted by
 /       \
| 1 0 0 0 |
| 0 1 0 0 |
| 0 0 0 0 |
| 0 0 0 0 |
 \       /
5 is interpreted by
 /       \
| 1 0 0 0 |
| 0 1 0 0 |
| 0 0 0 0 |
| 0 0 0 0 |
 \       /

After renaming modulo { 0->0, 1->1, 2->2, 3->3, 4->4, 5->5 }, 
it remains to prove termination of the 9-rule system
{ 0 0 -> 1 0 2 1 3 0 2 0 3 4 ,
  0 0 -> 5 2 4 4 4 4 2 2 1 2 ,
  3 0 0 -> 2 3 0 2 2 1 1 4 4 3 ,
  0 0 3 -> 1 4 5 3 5 1 5 3 0 5 ,
  0 0 5 -> 1 5 0 2 2 4 1 4 0 1 ,
  3 0 1 2 -> 2 2 5 3 2 2 0 4 1 1 ,
  1 3 0 5 2 -> 5 3 2 5 4 0 4 4 5 2 ,
  3 0 0 5 2 -> 2 0 2 5 4 2 1 3 2 2 ,
  2 3 0 0 4 0 -> 3 5 2 3 4 4 5 2 3 0 }


The system was filtered by the following matrix interpretation
of type E_J with J = {1,...,2} and dimension 3:

0 is interpreted by
 /     \
| 1 0 1 |
| 0 1 0 |
| 0 1 0 |
 \     /
1 is interpreted by
 /     \
| 1 0 0 |
| 0 1 0 |
| 0 0 0 |
 \     /
2 is interpreted by
 /     \
| 1 0 0 |
| 0 1 0 |
| 0 0 0 |
 \     /
3 is interpreted by
 /     \
| 1 0 0 |
| 0 1 0 |
| 0 0 0 |
 \     /
4 is interpreted by
 /     \
| 1 0 0 |
| 0 1 0 |
| 0 0 0 |
 \     /
5 is interpreted by
 /     \
| 1 0 0 |
| 0 1 0 |
| 0 0 0 |
 \     /

After renaming modulo { 3->0, 0->1, 1->2, 2->3, 5->4, 4->5 }, 
it remains to prove termination of the 2-rule system
{ 0 1 2 3 -> 3 3 4 0 3 3 1 5 2 2 ,
  2 0 1 4 3 -> 4 0 3 4 5 1 5 5 4 3 }


The system was filtered by the following matrix interpretation
of type E_J with J = {1,...,2} and dimension 5:

0 is interpreted by
 /         \
| 1 0 1 0 0 |
| 0 1 0 0 0 |
| 0 0 0 0 0 |
| 0 0 0 0 0 |
| 0 1 0 0 0 |
 \         /
1 is interpreted by
 /         \
| 1 0 0 0 0 |
| 0 1 0 0 0 |
| 0 0 0 1 0 |
| 0 0 0 0 0 |
| 0 0 0 0 0 |
 \         /
2 is interpreted by
 /         \
| 1 0 0 0 0 |
| 0 1 0 0 0 |
| 0 0 0 0 0 |
| 0 0 0 0 1 |
| 0 0 0 0 0 |
 \         /
3 is interpreted by
 /         \
| 1 0 0 0 0 |
| 0 1 0 0 0 |
| 0 0 0 0 0 |
| 0 0 0 0 0 |
| 0 1 0 0 0 |
 \         /
4 is interpreted by
 /         \
| 1 0 0 0 0 |
| 0 1 0 0 0 |
| 0 0 0 0 0 |
| 0 0 0 0 0 |
| 0 0 0 0 0 |
 \         /
5 is interpreted by
 /         \
| 1 0 0 0 0 |
| 0 1 0 0 0 |
| 0 0 0 0 0 |
| 0 0 0 0 0 |
| 0 0 0 0 0 |
 \         /

After renaming modulo { 2->0, 0->1, 1->2, 4->3, 3->4, 5->5 }, 
it remains to prove termination of the 1-rule system
{ 0 1 2 3 4 -> 3 1 4 3 5 2 5 5 3 4 }


The system was filtered by the following matrix interpretation
of type E_J with J = {1,...,2} and dimension 2:

0 is interpreted by
 /   \
| 1 1 |
| 0 1 |
 \   /
1 is interpreted by
 /   \
| 1 0 |
| 0 1 |
 \   /
2 is interpreted by
 /   \
| 1 0 |
| 0 1 |
 \   /
3 is interpreted by
 /   \
| 1 0 |
| 0 1 |
 \   /
4 is interpreted by
 /   \
| 1 0 |
| 0 1 |
 \   /
5 is interpreted by
 /   \
| 1 0 |
| 0 1 |
 \   /

After renaming modulo {  }, 
it remains to prove termination of the 0-rule system
{ }

The system is trivially terminating.