YES proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 794c25de1cacf0d048858bcd21c9a779e1221865 marcel 20200619 unpublished dirty Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven: (0) QTRS (1) QTRS Reverse [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (2) QTRS (3) DependencyPairsProof [EQUIVALENT, 1 ms] (4) QDP (5) QDPOrderProof [EQUIVALENT, 51 ms] (6) QDP (7) QDPOrderProof [EQUIVALENT, 4254 ms] (8) QDP (9) DependencyGraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (10) TRUE ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: Q restricted rewrite system: The TRS R consists of the following rules: a(a(b(x1))) -> b(a(a(a(x1)))) b(a(b(a(x1)))) -> a(b(b(x1))) Q is empty. ---------------------------------------- (1) QTRS Reverse (EQUIVALENT) We applied the QTRS Reverse Processor [REVERSE]. ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: Q restricted rewrite system: The TRS R consists of the following rules: b(a(a(x1))) -> a(a(a(b(x1)))) a(b(a(b(x1)))) -> b(b(a(x1))) Q is empty. ---------------------------------------- (3) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT) Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem. ---------------------------------------- (4) Obligation: Q DP problem: The TRS P consists of the following rules: B(a(a(x1))) -> A(a(a(b(x1)))) B(a(a(x1))) -> A(a(b(x1))) B(a(a(x1))) -> A(b(x1)) B(a(a(x1))) -> B(x1) A(b(a(b(x1)))) -> B(b(a(x1))) A(b(a(b(x1)))) -> B(a(x1)) A(b(a(b(x1)))) -> A(x1) The TRS R consists of the following rules: b(a(a(x1))) -> a(a(a(b(x1)))) a(b(a(b(x1)))) -> b(b(a(x1))) Q is empty. We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains. ---------------------------------------- (5) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT) We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04,JAR06]. The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted. A(b(a(b(x1)))) -> B(a(x1)) A(b(a(b(x1)))) -> A(x1) The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly. Used ordering: Polynomial Order [NEGPOLO,POLO] with Interpretation: POL( A_1(x_1) ) = x_1 POL( B_1(x_1) ) = 2x_1 + 1 POL( a_1(x_1) ) = x_1 POL( b_1(x_1) ) = 2x_1 + 1 The following usable rules [FROCOS05] with respect to the argument filtering of the ordering [JAR06] were oriented: a(b(a(b(x1)))) -> b(b(a(x1))) b(a(a(x1))) -> a(a(a(b(x1)))) ---------------------------------------- (6) Obligation: Q DP problem: The TRS P consists of the following rules: B(a(a(x1))) -> A(a(a(b(x1)))) B(a(a(x1))) -> A(a(b(x1))) B(a(a(x1))) -> A(b(x1)) B(a(a(x1))) -> B(x1) A(b(a(b(x1)))) -> B(b(a(x1))) The TRS R consists of the following rules: b(a(a(x1))) -> a(a(a(b(x1)))) a(b(a(b(x1)))) -> b(b(a(x1))) Q is empty. We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains. ---------------------------------------- (7) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT) We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04,JAR06]. The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted. B(a(a(x1))) -> A(a(b(x1))) B(a(a(x1))) -> A(b(x1)) B(a(a(x1))) -> B(x1) A(b(a(b(x1)))) -> B(b(a(x1))) The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly. Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO,RATPOLO]: POL(A(x_1)) = [1/2] + [1/2]x_1 POL(B(x_1)) = [1/2] + [3/4]x_1 POL(a(x_1)) = [1/4] + x_1 POL(b(x_1)) = [1/4] + [3/2]x_1 The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 1/32. The following usable rules [FROCOS05] with respect to the argument filtering of the ordering [JAR06] were oriented: a(b(a(b(x1)))) -> b(b(a(x1))) b(a(a(x1))) -> a(a(a(b(x1)))) ---------------------------------------- (8) Obligation: Q DP problem: The TRS P consists of the following rules: B(a(a(x1))) -> A(a(a(b(x1)))) The TRS R consists of the following rules: b(a(a(x1))) -> a(a(a(b(x1)))) a(b(a(b(x1)))) -> b(b(a(x1))) Q is empty. We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains. ---------------------------------------- (9) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT) The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 0 SCCs with 1 less node. ---------------------------------------- (10) TRUE