YES Problem: P(x1) -> Q(Q(p(x1))) p(p(x1)) -> q(q(x1)) p(Q(Q(x1))) -> Q(Q(p(x1))) Q(p(q(x1))) -> q(p(Q(x1))) q(q(p(x1))) -> p(q(q(x1))) q(Q(x1)) -> x1 Q(q(x1)) -> x1 p(P(x1)) -> x1 P(p(x1)) -> x1 Proof: String Reversal Processor: P(x1) -> p(Q(Q(x1))) p(p(x1)) -> q(q(x1)) Q(Q(p(x1))) -> p(Q(Q(x1))) q(p(Q(x1))) -> Q(p(q(x1))) p(q(q(x1))) -> q(q(p(x1))) Q(q(x1)) -> x1 q(Q(x1)) -> x1 P(p(x1)) -> x1 p(P(x1)) -> x1 Matrix Interpretation Processor: dim=1 interpretation: [p](x0) = 4x0 + 2, [q](x0) = x0, [P](x0) = 4x0 + 3, [Q](x0) = x0 orientation: P(x1) = 4x1 + 3 >= 4x1 + 2 = p(Q(Q(x1))) p(p(x1)) = 16x1 + 10 >= x1 = q(q(x1)) Q(Q(p(x1))) = 4x1 + 2 >= 4x1 + 2 = p(Q(Q(x1))) q(p(Q(x1))) = 4x1 + 2 >= 4x1 + 2 = Q(p(q(x1))) p(q(q(x1))) = 4x1 + 2 >= 4x1 + 2 = q(q(p(x1))) Q(q(x1)) = x1 >= x1 = x1 q(Q(x1)) = x1 >= x1 = x1 P(p(x1)) = 16x1 + 11 >= x1 = x1 p(P(x1)) = 16x1 + 14 >= x1 = x1 problem: Q(Q(p(x1))) -> p(Q(Q(x1))) q(p(Q(x1))) -> Q(p(q(x1))) p(q(q(x1))) -> q(q(p(x1))) Q(q(x1)) -> x1 q(Q(x1)) -> x1 Matrix Interpretation Processor: dim=1 interpretation: [p](x0) = x0, [q](x0) = x0, [Q](x0) = 4x0 + 1 orientation: Q(Q(p(x1))) = 16x1 + 5 >= 16x1 + 5 = p(Q(Q(x1))) q(p(Q(x1))) = 4x1 + 1 >= 4x1 + 1 = Q(p(q(x1))) p(q(q(x1))) = x1 >= x1 = q(q(p(x1))) Q(q(x1)) = 4x1 + 1 >= x1 = x1 q(Q(x1)) = 4x1 + 1 >= x1 = x1 problem: Q(Q(p(x1))) -> p(Q(Q(x1))) q(p(Q(x1))) -> Q(p(q(x1))) p(q(q(x1))) -> q(q(p(x1))) String Reversal Processor: p(Q(Q(x1))) -> Q(Q(p(x1))) Q(p(q(x1))) -> q(p(Q(x1))) q(q(p(x1))) -> p(q(q(x1))) Bounds Processor: bound: 0 enrichment: match automaton: final states: {8,5,1} transitions: Q0(4) -> 1* Q0(3) -> 4* Q0(2) -> 6* q0(7) -> 5* q0(9) -> 10* q0(2) -> 9* f40() -> 2* p0(6) -> 7* p0(2) -> 3* p0(10) -> 8* 8 -> 9,10 1 -> 3,7 5 -> 6,4 problem: Qed