NO proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.c # AProVE Commit ID: 794c25de1cacf0d048858bcd21c9a779e1221865 marcel 20200619 unpublished dirty Termination of the given C Problem could be disproven: (0) C Problem (1) CToIRSProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (2) IntTRS (3) IRS2T2 [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (4) T2IntSys (5) T2 [COMPLETE, 1253 ms] (6) NO ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: c file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.c ---------------------------------------- (1) CToIRSProof (EQUIVALENT) Parsed C Integer Program as IRS. ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: Rules: f1(x) -> f2(x_1) :|: TRUE f6(x1) -> f7(arith) :|: TRUE && arith = x1 - 1 f3(x2) -> f6(x2) :|: x2 < 0 f3(x11) -> f6(x11) :|: x11 > 0 f7(x3) -> f3(x3) :|: TRUE f3(x4) -> f8(x4) :|: x4 = 0 f2(x5) -> f3(x5) :|: x5 > x6 f2(x7) -> f4(x7) :|: x7 <= x8 f8(x9) -> f5(x9) :|: TRUE f4(x10) -> f5(x10) :|: TRUE Start term: f1(x) ---------------------------------------- (3) IRS2T2 (EQUIVALENT) Transformed input IRS into an integer transition system.Used the following mapping from defined symbols to location IDs: (f1_1,1) (f2_1,2) (f6_1,3) (f7_1,4) (f3_1,5) (f8_1,6) (f4_1,7) (f5_1,8) ---------------------------------------- (4) Obligation: START: 1; FROM: 1; oldX0 := x0; oldX1 := nondet(); assume(0 = 0); x0 := oldX1; TO: 2; FROM: 3; oldX0 := x0; oldX1 := -(1 - oldX0); assume(0 = 0 && oldX1 = oldX0 - 1); x0 := -(1 - oldX0); TO: 4; FROM: 5; oldX0 := x0; assume(oldX0 < 0); x0 := oldX0; TO: 3; FROM: 5; oldX0 := x0; assume(oldX0 > 0); x0 := oldX0; TO: 3; FROM: 4; oldX0 := x0; assume(0 = 0); x0 := oldX0; TO: 5; FROM: 5; oldX0 := x0; assume(oldX0 = 0); x0 := oldX0; TO: 6; FROM: 2; oldX0 := x0; oldX1 := nondet(); assume(oldX0 > oldX1); x0 := oldX0; TO: 5; FROM: 2; oldX0 := x0; oldX1 := nondet(); assume(oldX0 <= oldX1); x0 := oldX0; TO: 7; FROM: 6; oldX0 := x0; assume(0 = 0); x0 := oldX0; TO: 8; FROM: 7; oldX0 := x0; assume(0 = 0); x0 := oldX0; TO: 8; ---------------------------------------- (5) T2 (COMPLETE) Found this recurrent set for cutpoint 9: 0 <= 0 and x0+1 <= 0 ---------------------------------------- (6) NO