YES proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.c # AProVE Commit ID: 794c25de1cacf0d048858bcd21c9a779e1221865 marcel 20200619 unpublished dirty Termination of the given C Problem could be proven: (0) C Problem (1) CToIRSProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (2) IntTRS (3) TerminationGraphProcessor [SOUND, 16 ms] (4) IntTRS (5) IntTRSCompressionProof [EQUIVALENT, 5 ms] (6) IntTRS (7) IntTRSUnneededArgumentFilterProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (8) IntTRS (9) PolynomialOrderProcessor [EQUIVALENT, 8 ms] (10) YES ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: c file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.c ---------------------------------------- (1) CToIRSProof (EQUIVALENT) Parsed C Integer Program as IRS. ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: Rules: f1(x, y, r) -> f2(x_1, y, r) :|: TRUE f2(x1, x2, x3) -> f3(x1, x4, x3) :|: TRUE f3(x5, x6, x7) -> f4(x5, x6, 1) :|: TRUE f5(x8, x9, x10) -> f6(x8, x9, arith) :|: TRUE && arith = x10 * x8 f6(x23, x24, x25) -> f7(x23, x26, x25) :|: TRUE && x26 = x24 - 1 f4(x14, x15, x16) -> f5(x14, x15, x16) :|: x15 > 0 f7(x17, x18, x19) -> f4(x17, x18, x19) :|: TRUE f4(x20, x21, x22) -> f8(x20, x21, x22) :|: x21 <= 0 Start term: f1(x, y, r) ---------------------------------------- (3) TerminationGraphProcessor (SOUND) Constructed the termination graph and obtained one non-trivial SCC. ---------------------------------------- (4) Obligation: Rules: f4(x14, x15, x16) -> f5(x14, x15, x16) :|: x15 > 0 f7(x17, x18, x19) -> f4(x17, x18, x19) :|: TRUE f6(x23, x24, x25) -> f7(x23, x26, x25) :|: TRUE && x26 = x24 - 1 f5(x8, x9, x10) -> f6(x8, x9, arith) :|: TRUE && arith = x10 * x8 ---------------------------------------- (5) IntTRSCompressionProof (EQUIVALENT) Compressed rules. ---------------------------------------- (6) Obligation: Rules: f6(x23:0, x24:0, x25:0) -> f6(x23:0, x24:0 - 1, x25:0 * x23:0) :|: x24:0 > 1 ---------------------------------------- (7) IntTRSUnneededArgumentFilterProof (EQUIVALENT) Some arguments are removed because they cannot influence termination. We removed arguments according to the following replacements: f6(x1, x2, x3) -> f6(x2) ---------------------------------------- (8) Obligation: Rules: f6(x24:0) -> f6(x24:0 - 1) :|: x24:0 > 1 ---------------------------------------- (9) PolynomialOrderProcessor (EQUIVALENT) Found the following polynomial interpretation: [f6(x)] = x The following rules are decreasing: f6(x24:0) -> f6(x24:0 - 1) :|: x24:0 > 1 The following rules are bounded: f6(x24:0) -> f6(x24:0 - 1) :|: x24:0 > 1 ---------------------------------------- (10) YES