/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_standard /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


YES
proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml
# AProVE Commit ID: 794c25de1cacf0d048858bcd21c9a779e1221865 marcel 20200619 unpublished dirty


Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven:

(0) QTRS
(1) DependencyPairsProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms]
(2) QDP
(3) QDPOrderProof [EQUIVALENT, 28 ms]
(4) QDP
(5) MRRProof [EQUIVALENT, 42 ms]
(6) QDP
(7) PisEmptyProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms]
(8) YES


----------------------------------------

(0)
Obligation:
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

   b(a(a(b(x1)))) -> b(b(b(a(x1))))
   b(b(b(b(x1)))) -> a(b(b(b(x1))))
   b(a(b(b(x1)))) -> b(a(b(a(x1))))

Q is empty.

----------------------------------------

(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT)
Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.
----------------------------------------

(2)
Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

   B(a(a(b(x1)))) -> B(b(b(a(x1))))
   B(a(a(b(x1)))) -> B(b(a(x1)))
   B(a(a(b(x1)))) -> B(a(x1))
   B(a(b(b(x1)))) -> B(a(b(a(x1))))
   B(a(b(b(x1)))) -> B(a(x1))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

   b(a(a(b(x1)))) -> b(b(b(a(x1))))
   b(b(b(b(x1)))) -> a(b(b(b(x1))))
   b(a(b(b(x1)))) -> b(a(b(a(x1))))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
----------------------------------------

(3) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT)
We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04,JAR06].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

   B(a(a(b(x1)))) -> B(b(a(x1)))
   B(a(a(b(x1)))) -> B(a(x1))
   B(a(b(b(x1)))) -> B(a(x1))
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering:  Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

   POL(B(x_1)) = x_1
   POL(a(x_1)) = 1 + x_1
   POL(b(x_1)) = 1 + x_1

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] with respect to the argument filtering of the ordering [JAR06] were oriented:

   b(a(b(b(x1)))) -> b(a(b(a(x1))))
   b(a(a(b(x1)))) -> b(b(b(a(x1))))
   b(b(b(b(x1)))) -> a(b(b(b(x1))))


----------------------------------------

(4)
Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

   B(a(a(b(x1)))) -> B(b(b(a(x1))))
   B(a(b(b(x1)))) -> B(a(b(a(x1))))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

   b(a(a(b(x1)))) -> b(b(b(a(x1))))
   b(b(b(b(x1)))) -> a(b(b(b(x1))))
   b(a(b(b(x1)))) -> b(a(b(a(x1))))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
----------------------------------------

(5) MRRProof (EQUIVALENT)
By using the rule removal processor [LPAR04] with the following ordering, at least one Dependency Pair or term rewrite system rule of this QDP problem can be strictly oriented.

Strictly oriented dependency pairs:

   B(a(a(b(x1)))) -> B(b(b(a(x1))))
   B(a(b(b(x1)))) -> B(a(b(a(x1))))

Strictly oriented rules of the TRS R:

   b(a(a(b(x1)))) -> b(b(b(a(x1))))
   b(b(b(b(x1)))) -> a(b(b(b(x1))))
   b(a(b(b(x1)))) -> b(a(b(a(x1))))

Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

   POL(B(x_1)) = x_1
   POL(a(x_1)) = 2*x_1
   POL(b(x_1)) = 1 + 2*x_1


----------------------------------------

(6)
Obligation:
Q DP problem:
P is empty.
R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
----------------------------------------

(7) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT)
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.
----------------------------------------

(8)
YES