/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/starexec_run_default /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- YES After renaming modulo { a->0, b->1, c->2 }, it remains to prove termination of the 4-rule system { 0 1 2 -> 2 1 0 0 2 1 , 0 -> , 1 -> , 2 -> } Applying sparse tiling TRFC(2) [Geser/Hofbauer/Waldmann, FSCD 2019]. After renaming modulo { (0,0)->0, (0,1)->1, (1,2)->2, (2,0)->3, (0,2)->4, (2,1)->5, (1,0)->6, (1,1)->7, (2,2)->8, (2,4)->9, (1,4)->10, (3,0)->11, (3,2)->12, (0,4)->13, (3,1)->14, (3,4)->15 }, it remains to prove termination of the 64-rule system { 0 1 2 3 -> 4 5 6 0 4 5 6 , 0 1 2 5 -> 4 5 6 0 4 5 7 , 0 1 2 8 -> 4 5 6 0 4 5 2 , 0 1 2 9 -> 4 5 6 0 4 5 10 , 6 1 2 3 -> 2 5 6 0 4 5 6 , 6 1 2 5 -> 2 5 6 0 4 5 7 , 6 1 2 8 -> 2 5 6 0 4 5 2 , 6 1 2 9 -> 2 5 6 0 4 5 10 , 3 1 2 3 -> 8 5 6 0 4 5 6 , 3 1 2 5 -> 8 5 6 0 4 5 7 , 3 1 2 8 -> 8 5 6 0 4 5 2 , 3 1 2 9 -> 8 5 6 0 4 5 10 , 11 1 2 3 -> 12 5 6 0 4 5 6 , 11 1 2 5 -> 12 5 6 0 4 5 7 , 11 1 2 8 -> 12 5 6 0 4 5 2 , 11 1 2 9 -> 12 5 6 0 4 5 10 , 0 0 -> 0 , 0 1 -> 1 , 0 4 -> 4 , 0 13 -> 13 , 6 0 -> 6 , 6 1 -> 7 , 6 4 -> 2 , 6 13 -> 10 , 3 0 -> 3 , 3 1 -> 5 , 3 4 -> 8 , 3 13 -> 9 , 11 0 -> 11 , 11 1 -> 14 , 11 4 -> 12 , 11 13 -> 15 , 1 6 -> 0 , 1 7 -> 1 , 1 2 -> 4 , 1 10 -> 13 , 7 6 -> 6 , 7 7 -> 7 , 7 2 -> 2 , 7 10 -> 10 , 5 6 -> 3 , 5 7 -> 5 , 5 2 -> 8 , 5 10 -> 9 , 14 6 -> 11 , 14 7 -> 14 , 14 2 -> 12 , 14 10 -> 15 , 4 3 -> 0 , 4 5 -> 1 , 4 8 -> 4 , 4 9 -> 13 , 2 3 -> 6 , 2 5 -> 7 , 2 8 -> 2 , 2 9 -> 10 , 8 3 -> 3 , 8 5 -> 5 , 8 8 -> 8 , 8 9 -> 9 , 12 3 -> 11 , 12 5 -> 14 , 12 8 -> 12 , 12 9 -> 15 } The system was filtered by the following matrix interpretation of type E_J with J = {1,...,2} and dimension 2: 0 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 | | 0 1 | \ / 1 is interpreted by / \ | 1 1 | | 0 1 | \ / 2 is interpreted by / \ | 1 2 | | 0 1 | \ / 3 is interpreted by / \ | 1 3 | | 0 1 | \ / 4 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 | | 0 1 | \ / 5 is interpreted by / \ | 1 1 | | 0 1 | \ / 6 is interpreted by / \ | 1 2 | | 0 1 | \ / 7 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 | | 0 1 | \ / 8 is interpreted by / \ | 1 3 | | 0 1 | \ / 9 is interpreted by / \ | 1 2 | | 0 1 | \ / 10 is interpreted by / \ | 1 1 | | 0 1 | \ / 11 is interpreted by / \ | 1 1 | | 0 1 | \ / 12 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 | | 0 1 | \ / 13 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 | | 0 1 | \ / 14 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 | | 0 1 | \ / 15 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 | | 0 1 | \ / After renaming modulo { 0->0, 1->1, 2->2, 3->3, 4->4, 5->5, 6->6, 7->7, 8->8, 9->9, 10->10, 13->11, 11->12, 14->13 }, it remains to prove termination of the 32-rule system { 0 1 2 3 -> 4 5 6 0 4 5 6 , 0 1 2 5 -> 4 5 6 0 4 5 7 , 0 1 2 8 -> 4 5 6 0 4 5 2 , 0 1 2 9 -> 4 5 6 0 4 5 10 , 6 1 2 3 -> 2 5 6 0 4 5 6 , 6 1 2 5 -> 2 5 6 0 4 5 7 , 6 1 2 8 -> 2 5 6 0 4 5 2 , 6 1 2 9 -> 2 5 6 0 4 5 10 , 3 1 2 3 -> 8 5 6 0 4 5 6 , 3 1 2 5 -> 8 5 6 0 4 5 7 , 3 1 2 8 -> 8 5 6 0 4 5 2 , 3 1 2 9 -> 8 5 6 0 4 5 10 , 0 0 -> 0 , 0 1 -> 1 , 0 4 -> 4 , 0 11 -> 11 , 6 0 -> 6 , 6 4 -> 2 , 3 0 -> 3 , 3 4 -> 8 , 12 0 -> 12 , 1 7 -> 1 , 7 6 -> 6 , 7 7 -> 7 , 7 2 -> 2 , 7 10 -> 10 , 5 6 -> 3 , 5 7 -> 5 , 5 2 -> 8 , 5 10 -> 9 , 13 7 -> 13 , 4 5 -> 1 } The system was filtered by the following matrix interpretation of type E_J with J = {1,...,2} and dimension 3: 0 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 1 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 1 0 | \ / 1 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 2 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 3 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 4 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 5 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 6 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 7 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 8 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 9 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 10 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 11 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 12 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 13 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / After renaming modulo { 0->0, 1->1, 2->2, 3->3, 4->4, 5->5, 6->6, 7->7, 8->8, 9->9, 10->10, 11->11, 12->12, 13->13 }, it remains to prove termination of the 31-rule system { 0 1 2 3 -> 4 5 6 0 4 5 6 , 0 1 2 5 -> 4 5 6 0 4 5 7 , 0 1 2 8 -> 4 5 6 0 4 5 2 , 0 1 2 9 -> 4 5 6 0 4 5 10 , 6 1 2 3 -> 2 5 6 0 4 5 6 , 6 1 2 5 -> 2 5 6 0 4 5 7 , 6 1 2 8 -> 2 5 6 0 4 5 2 , 6 1 2 9 -> 2 5 6 0 4 5 10 , 3 1 2 3 -> 8 5 6 0 4 5 6 , 3 1 2 5 -> 8 5 6 0 4 5 7 , 3 1 2 8 -> 8 5 6 0 4 5 2 , 3 1 2 9 -> 8 5 6 0 4 5 10 , 0 1 -> 1 , 0 4 -> 4 , 0 11 -> 11 , 6 0 -> 6 , 6 4 -> 2 , 3 0 -> 3 , 3 4 -> 8 , 12 0 -> 12 , 1 7 -> 1 , 7 6 -> 6 , 7 7 -> 7 , 7 2 -> 2 , 7 10 -> 10 , 5 6 -> 3 , 5 7 -> 5 , 5 2 -> 8 , 5 10 -> 9 , 13 7 -> 13 , 4 5 -> 1 } Applying the dependency pairs transformation. After renaming modulo { (0,true)->0, (1,false)->1, (2,false)->2, (3,false)->3, (4,true)->4, (5,false)->5, (6,false)->6, (0,false)->7, (4,false)->8, (5,true)->9, (6,true)->10, (7,false)->11, (7,true)->12, (8,false)->13, (9,false)->14, (10,false)->15, (3,true)->16, (1,true)->17, (12,true)->18, (13,true)->19, (11,false)->20, (12,false)->21, (13,false)->22 }, it remains to prove termination of the 113-rule system { 0 1 2 3 -> 4 5 6 7 8 5 6 , 0 1 2 3 -> 9 6 7 8 5 6 , 0 1 2 3 -> 10 7 8 5 6 , 0 1 2 3 -> 0 8 5 6 , 0 1 2 3 -> 4 5 6 , 0 1 2 3 -> 9 6 , 0 1 2 3 -> 10 , 0 1 2 5 -> 4 5 6 7 8 5 11 , 0 1 2 5 -> 9 6 7 8 5 11 , 0 1 2 5 -> 10 7 8 5 11 , 0 1 2 5 -> 0 8 5 11 , 0 1 2 5 -> 4 5 11 , 0 1 2 5 -> 9 11 , 0 1 2 5 -> 12 , 0 1 2 13 -> 4 5 6 7 8 5 2 , 0 1 2 13 -> 9 6 7 8 5 2 , 0 1 2 13 -> 10 7 8 5 2 , 0 1 2 13 -> 0 8 5 2 , 0 1 2 13 -> 4 5 2 , 0 1 2 13 -> 9 2 , 0 1 2 14 -> 4 5 6 7 8 5 15 , 0 1 2 14 -> 9 6 7 8 5 15 , 0 1 2 14 -> 10 7 8 5 15 , 0 1 2 14 -> 0 8 5 15 , 0 1 2 14 -> 4 5 15 , 0 1 2 14 -> 9 15 , 10 1 2 3 -> 9 6 7 8 5 6 , 10 1 2 3 -> 10 7 8 5 6 , 10 1 2 3 -> 0 8 5 6 , 10 1 2 3 -> 4 5 6 , 10 1 2 3 -> 9 6 , 10 1 2 3 -> 10 , 10 1 2 5 -> 9 6 7 8 5 11 , 10 1 2 5 -> 10 7 8 5 11 , 10 1 2 5 -> 0 8 5 11 , 10 1 2 5 -> 4 5 11 , 10 1 2 5 -> 9 11 , 10 1 2 5 -> 12 , 10 1 2 13 -> 9 6 7 8 5 2 , 10 1 2 13 -> 10 7 8 5 2 , 10 1 2 13 -> 0 8 5 2 , 10 1 2 13 -> 4 5 2 , 10 1 2 13 -> 9 2 , 10 1 2 14 -> 9 6 7 8 5 15 , 10 1 2 14 -> 10 7 8 5 15 , 10 1 2 14 -> 0 8 5 15 , 10 1 2 14 -> 4 5 15 , 10 1 2 14 -> 9 15 , 16 1 2 3 -> 9 6 7 8 5 6 , 16 1 2 3 -> 10 7 8 5 6 , 16 1 2 3 -> 0 8 5 6 , 16 1 2 3 -> 4 5 6 , 16 1 2 3 -> 9 6 , 16 1 2 3 -> 10 , 16 1 2 5 -> 9 6 7 8 5 11 , 16 1 2 5 -> 10 7 8 5 11 , 16 1 2 5 -> 0 8 5 11 , 16 1 2 5 -> 4 5 11 , 16 1 2 5 -> 9 11 , 16 1 2 5 -> 12 , 16 1 2 13 -> 9 6 7 8 5 2 , 16 1 2 13 -> 10 7 8 5 2 , 16 1 2 13 -> 0 8 5 2 , 16 1 2 13 -> 4 5 2 , 16 1 2 13 -> 9 2 , 16 1 2 14 -> 9 6 7 8 5 15 , 16 1 2 14 -> 10 7 8 5 15 , 16 1 2 14 -> 0 8 5 15 , 16 1 2 14 -> 4 5 15 , 16 1 2 14 -> 9 15 , 0 1 -> 17 , 0 8 -> 4 , 10 7 -> 10 , 16 7 -> 16 , 18 7 -> 18 , 17 11 -> 17 , 12 6 -> 10 , 12 11 -> 12 , 9 6 -> 16 , 9 11 -> 9 , 19 11 -> 19 , 4 5 -> 17 , 7 1 2 3 ->= 8 5 6 7 8 5 6 , 7 1 2 5 ->= 8 5 6 7 8 5 11 , 7 1 2 13 ->= 8 5 6 7 8 5 2 , 7 1 2 14 ->= 8 5 6 7 8 5 15 , 6 1 2 3 ->= 2 5 6 7 8 5 6 , 6 1 2 5 ->= 2 5 6 7 8 5 11 , 6 1 2 13 ->= 2 5 6 7 8 5 2 , 6 1 2 14 ->= 2 5 6 7 8 5 15 , 3 1 2 3 ->= 13 5 6 7 8 5 6 , 3 1 2 5 ->= 13 5 6 7 8 5 11 , 3 1 2 13 ->= 13 5 6 7 8 5 2 , 3 1 2 14 ->= 13 5 6 7 8 5 15 , 7 1 ->= 1 , 7 8 ->= 8 , 7 20 ->= 20 , 6 7 ->= 6 , 6 8 ->= 2 , 3 7 ->= 3 , 3 8 ->= 13 , 21 7 ->= 21 , 1 11 ->= 1 , 11 6 ->= 6 , 11 11 ->= 11 , 11 2 ->= 2 , 11 15 ->= 15 , 5 6 ->= 3 , 5 11 ->= 5 , 5 2 ->= 13 , 5 15 ->= 14 , 22 11 ->= 22 , 8 5 ->= 1 } The system was filtered by the following matrix interpretation of type E_J with J = {1,...,2} and dimension 2: 0 is interpreted by / \ | 1 1 | | 0 1 | \ / 1 is interpreted by / \ | 1 2 | | 0 1 | \ / 2 is interpreted by / \ | 1 2 | | 0 1 | \ / 3 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 | | 0 1 | \ / 4 is interpreted by / \ | 1 1 | | 0 1 | \ / 5 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 | | 0 1 | \ / 6 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 | | 0 1 | \ / 7 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 | | 0 1 | \ / 8 is interpreted by / \ | 1 2 | | 0 1 | \ / 9 is interpreted by / \ | 1 1 | | 0 1 | \ / 10 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 | | 0 1 | \ / 11 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 | | 0 1 | \ / 12 is interpreted by / \ | 1 1 | | 0 1 | \ / 13 is interpreted by / \ | 1 2 | | 0 1 | \ / 14 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 | | 0 1 | \ / 15 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 | | 0 1 | \ / 16 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 | | 0 1 | \ / 17 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 | | 0 1 | \ / 18 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 | | 0 1 | \ / 19 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 | | 0 1 | \ / 20 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 | | 0 1 | \ / 21 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 | | 0 1 | \ / 22 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 | | 0 1 | \ / After renaming modulo { 10->0, 7->1, 16->2, 18->3, 17->4, 11->5, 12->6, 9->7, 19->8, 1->9, 2->10, 3->11, 8->12, 5->13, 6->14, 13->15, 14->16, 15->17, 20->18, 21->19, 22->20 }, it remains to prove termination of the 38-rule system { 0 1 -> 0 , 2 1 -> 2 , 3 1 -> 3 , 4 5 -> 4 , 6 5 -> 6 , 7 5 -> 7 , 8 5 -> 8 , 1 9 10 11 ->= 12 13 14 1 12 13 14 , 1 9 10 13 ->= 12 13 14 1 12 13 5 , 1 9 10 15 ->= 12 13 14 1 12 13 10 , 1 9 10 16 ->= 12 13 14 1 12 13 17 , 14 9 10 11 ->= 10 13 14 1 12 13 14 , 14 9 10 13 ->= 10 13 14 1 12 13 5 , 14 9 10 15 ->= 10 13 14 1 12 13 10 , 14 9 10 16 ->= 10 13 14 1 12 13 17 , 11 9 10 11 ->= 15 13 14 1 12 13 14 , 11 9 10 13 ->= 15 13 14 1 12 13 5 , 11 9 10 15 ->= 15 13 14 1 12 13 10 , 11 9 10 16 ->= 15 13 14 1 12 13 17 , 1 9 ->= 9 , 1 12 ->= 12 , 1 18 ->= 18 , 14 1 ->= 14 , 14 12 ->= 10 , 11 1 ->= 11 , 11 12 ->= 15 , 19 1 ->= 19 , 9 5 ->= 9 , 5 14 ->= 14 , 5 5 ->= 5 , 5 10 ->= 10 , 5 17 ->= 17 , 13 14 ->= 11 , 13 5 ->= 13 , 13 10 ->= 15 , 13 17 ->= 16 , 20 5 ->= 20 , 12 13 ->= 9 } The system was filtered by the following matrix interpretation of type E_J with J = {1,...,2} and dimension 3: 0 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 1 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 1 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 1 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 1 0 | \ / 2 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 3 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 4 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 5 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 6 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 7 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 8 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 9 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 10 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 11 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 12 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 13 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 14 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 15 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 16 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 17 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 18 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 19 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 20 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / After renaming modulo { 2->0, 1->1, 3->2, 4->3, 5->4, 6->5, 7->6, 8->7, 9->8, 10->9, 11->10, 12->11, 13->12, 14->13, 15->14, 16->15, 17->16, 18->17, 19->18, 20->19 }, it remains to prove termination of the 37-rule system { 0 1 -> 0 , 2 1 -> 2 , 3 4 -> 3 , 5 4 -> 5 , 6 4 -> 6 , 7 4 -> 7 , 1 8 9 10 ->= 11 12 13 1 11 12 13 , 1 8 9 12 ->= 11 12 13 1 11 12 4 , 1 8 9 14 ->= 11 12 13 1 11 12 9 , 1 8 9 15 ->= 11 12 13 1 11 12 16 , 13 8 9 10 ->= 9 12 13 1 11 12 13 , 13 8 9 12 ->= 9 12 13 1 11 12 4 , 13 8 9 14 ->= 9 12 13 1 11 12 9 , 13 8 9 15 ->= 9 12 13 1 11 12 16 , 10 8 9 10 ->= 14 12 13 1 11 12 13 , 10 8 9 12 ->= 14 12 13 1 11 12 4 , 10 8 9 14 ->= 14 12 13 1 11 12 9 , 10 8 9 15 ->= 14 12 13 1 11 12 16 , 1 8 ->= 8 , 1 11 ->= 11 , 1 17 ->= 17 , 13 1 ->= 13 , 13 11 ->= 9 , 10 1 ->= 10 , 10 11 ->= 14 , 18 1 ->= 18 , 8 4 ->= 8 , 4 13 ->= 13 , 4 4 ->= 4 , 4 9 ->= 9 , 4 16 ->= 16 , 12 13 ->= 10 , 12 4 ->= 12 , 12 9 ->= 14 , 12 16 ->= 15 , 19 4 ->= 19 , 11 12 ->= 8 } The system was filtered by the following matrix interpretation of type E_J with J = {1,...,2} and dimension 3: 0 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 1 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 1 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 1 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 1 0 | \ / 2 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 3 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 4 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 5 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 6 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 7 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 8 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 9 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 10 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 11 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 12 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 13 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 14 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 15 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 16 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 17 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 18 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 19 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / After renaming modulo { 2->0, 1->1, 3->2, 4->3, 5->4, 6->5, 7->6, 8->7, 9->8, 10->9, 11->10, 12->11, 13->12, 14->13, 15->14, 16->15, 17->16, 18->17, 19->18 }, it remains to prove termination of the 36-rule system { 0 1 -> 0 , 2 3 -> 2 , 4 3 -> 4 , 5 3 -> 5 , 6 3 -> 6 , 1 7 8 9 ->= 10 11 12 1 10 11 12 , 1 7 8 11 ->= 10 11 12 1 10 11 3 , 1 7 8 13 ->= 10 11 12 1 10 11 8 , 1 7 8 14 ->= 10 11 12 1 10 11 15 , 12 7 8 9 ->= 8 11 12 1 10 11 12 , 12 7 8 11 ->= 8 11 12 1 10 11 3 , 12 7 8 13 ->= 8 11 12 1 10 11 8 , 12 7 8 14 ->= 8 11 12 1 10 11 15 , 9 7 8 9 ->= 13 11 12 1 10 11 12 , 9 7 8 11 ->= 13 11 12 1 10 11 3 , 9 7 8 13 ->= 13 11 12 1 10 11 8 , 9 7 8 14 ->= 13 11 12 1 10 11 15 , 1 7 ->= 7 , 1 10 ->= 10 , 1 16 ->= 16 , 12 1 ->= 12 , 12 10 ->= 8 , 9 1 ->= 9 , 9 10 ->= 13 , 17 1 ->= 17 , 7 3 ->= 7 , 3 12 ->= 12 , 3 3 ->= 3 , 3 8 ->= 8 , 3 15 ->= 15 , 11 12 ->= 9 , 11 3 ->= 11 , 11 8 ->= 13 , 11 15 ->= 14 , 18 3 ->= 18 , 10 11 ->= 7 } The system was filtered by the following matrix interpretation of type E_J with J = {1,...,2} and dimension 3: 0 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 1 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 1 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 1 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 1 0 | \ / 2 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 3 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 4 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 5 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 6 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 7 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 8 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 9 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 10 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 11 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 12 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 13 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 14 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 15 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 16 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 17 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 18 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / After renaming modulo { 2->0, 3->1, 4->2, 5->3, 6->4, 1->5, 7->6, 8->7, 9->8, 10->9, 11->10, 12->11, 13->12, 14->13, 15->14, 16->15, 17->16, 18->17 }, it remains to prove termination of the 35-rule system { 0 1 -> 0 , 2 1 -> 2 , 3 1 -> 3 , 4 1 -> 4 , 5 6 7 8 ->= 9 10 11 5 9 10 11 , 5 6 7 10 ->= 9 10 11 5 9 10 1 , 5 6 7 12 ->= 9 10 11 5 9 10 7 , 5 6 7 13 ->= 9 10 11 5 9 10 14 , 11 6 7 8 ->= 7 10 11 5 9 10 11 , 11 6 7 10 ->= 7 10 11 5 9 10 1 , 11 6 7 12 ->= 7 10 11 5 9 10 7 , 11 6 7 13 ->= 7 10 11 5 9 10 14 , 8 6 7 8 ->= 12 10 11 5 9 10 11 , 8 6 7 10 ->= 12 10 11 5 9 10 1 , 8 6 7 12 ->= 12 10 11 5 9 10 7 , 8 6 7 13 ->= 12 10 11 5 9 10 14 , 5 6 ->= 6 , 5 9 ->= 9 , 5 15 ->= 15 , 11 5 ->= 11 , 11 9 ->= 7 , 8 5 ->= 8 , 8 9 ->= 12 , 16 5 ->= 16 , 6 1 ->= 6 , 1 11 ->= 11 , 1 1 ->= 1 , 1 7 ->= 7 , 1 14 ->= 14 , 10 11 ->= 8 , 10 1 ->= 10 , 10 7 ->= 12 , 10 14 ->= 13 , 17 1 ->= 17 , 9 10 ->= 6 } The system was filtered by the following matrix interpretation of type E_J with J = {1,...,2} and dimension 3: 0 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 1 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 1 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 1 1 | \ / 2 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 3 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 4 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 5 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 6 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 7 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 8 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 9 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 10 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 11 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 12 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 13 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 14 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 15 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 16 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 17 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / After renaming modulo { 2->0, 1->1, 3->2, 4->3, 5->4, 6->5, 7->6, 8->7, 9->8, 10->9, 11->10, 12->11, 13->12, 14->13, 15->14, 16->15, 17->16 }, it remains to prove termination of the 34-rule system { 0 1 -> 0 , 2 1 -> 2 , 3 1 -> 3 , 4 5 6 7 ->= 8 9 10 4 8 9 10 , 4 5 6 9 ->= 8 9 10 4 8 9 1 , 4 5 6 11 ->= 8 9 10 4 8 9 6 , 4 5 6 12 ->= 8 9 10 4 8 9 13 , 10 5 6 7 ->= 6 9 10 4 8 9 10 , 10 5 6 9 ->= 6 9 10 4 8 9 1 , 10 5 6 11 ->= 6 9 10 4 8 9 6 , 10 5 6 12 ->= 6 9 10 4 8 9 13 , 7 5 6 7 ->= 11 9 10 4 8 9 10 , 7 5 6 9 ->= 11 9 10 4 8 9 1 , 7 5 6 11 ->= 11 9 10 4 8 9 6 , 7 5 6 12 ->= 11 9 10 4 8 9 13 , 4 5 ->= 5 , 4 8 ->= 8 , 4 14 ->= 14 , 10 4 ->= 10 , 10 8 ->= 6 , 7 4 ->= 7 , 7 8 ->= 11 , 15 4 ->= 15 , 5 1 ->= 5 , 1 10 ->= 10 , 1 1 ->= 1 , 1 6 ->= 6 , 1 13 ->= 13 , 9 10 ->= 7 , 9 1 ->= 9 , 9 6 ->= 11 , 9 13 ->= 12 , 16 1 ->= 16 , 8 9 ->= 5 } The system was filtered by the following matrix interpretation of type E_J with J = {1,...,2} and dimension 3: 0 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 1 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 1 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 1 1 | \ / 2 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 3 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 4 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 5 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 6 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 7 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 8 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 9 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 10 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 11 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 12 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 13 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 14 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 15 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 16 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / After renaming modulo { 2->0, 1->1, 3->2, 4->3, 5->4, 6->5, 7->6, 8->7, 9->8, 10->9, 11->10, 12->11, 13->12, 14->13, 15->14, 16->15 }, it remains to prove termination of the 33-rule system { 0 1 -> 0 , 2 1 -> 2 , 3 4 5 6 ->= 7 8 9 3 7 8 9 , 3 4 5 8 ->= 7 8 9 3 7 8 1 , 3 4 5 10 ->= 7 8 9 3 7 8 5 , 3 4 5 11 ->= 7 8 9 3 7 8 12 , 9 4 5 6 ->= 5 8 9 3 7 8 9 , 9 4 5 8 ->= 5 8 9 3 7 8 1 , 9 4 5 10 ->= 5 8 9 3 7 8 5 , 9 4 5 11 ->= 5 8 9 3 7 8 12 , 6 4 5 6 ->= 10 8 9 3 7 8 9 , 6 4 5 8 ->= 10 8 9 3 7 8 1 , 6 4 5 10 ->= 10 8 9 3 7 8 5 , 6 4 5 11 ->= 10 8 9 3 7 8 12 , 3 4 ->= 4 , 3 7 ->= 7 , 3 13 ->= 13 , 9 3 ->= 9 , 9 7 ->= 5 , 6 3 ->= 6 , 6 7 ->= 10 , 14 3 ->= 14 , 4 1 ->= 4 , 1 9 ->= 9 , 1 1 ->= 1 , 1 5 ->= 5 , 1 12 ->= 12 , 8 9 ->= 6 , 8 1 ->= 8 , 8 5 ->= 10 , 8 12 ->= 11 , 15 1 ->= 15 , 7 8 ->= 4 } The system was filtered by the following matrix interpretation of type E_J with J = {1,...,2} and dimension 3: 0 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 1 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 1 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 1 1 | \ / 2 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 3 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 4 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 5 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 6 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 7 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 8 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 9 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 10 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 11 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 12 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 13 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 14 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 15 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / After renaming modulo { 2->0, 1->1, 3->2, 4->3, 5->4, 6->5, 7->6, 8->7, 9->8, 10->9, 11->10, 12->11, 13->12, 14->13, 15->14 }, it remains to prove termination of the 32-rule system { 0 1 -> 0 , 2 3 4 5 ->= 6 7 8 2 6 7 8 , 2 3 4 7 ->= 6 7 8 2 6 7 1 , 2 3 4 9 ->= 6 7 8 2 6 7 4 , 2 3 4 10 ->= 6 7 8 2 6 7 11 , 8 3 4 5 ->= 4 7 8 2 6 7 8 , 8 3 4 7 ->= 4 7 8 2 6 7 1 , 8 3 4 9 ->= 4 7 8 2 6 7 4 , 8 3 4 10 ->= 4 7 8 2 6 7 11 , 5 3 4 5 ->= 9 7 8 2 6 7 8 , 5 3 4 7 ->= 9 7 8 2 6 7 1 , 5 3 4 9 ->= 9 7 8 2 6 7 4 , 5 3 4 10 ->= 9 7 8 2 6 7 11 , 2 3 ->= 3 , 2 6 ->= 6 , 2 12 ->= 12 , 8 2 ->= 8 , 8 6 ->= 4 , 5 2 ->= 5 , 5 6 ->= 9 , 13 2 ->= 13 , 3 1 ->= 3 , 1 8 ->= 8 , 1 1 ->= 1 , 1 4 ->= 4 , 1 11 ->= 11 , 7 8 ->= 5 , 7 1 ->= 7 , 7 4 ->= 9 , 7 11 ->= 10 , 14 1 ->= 14 , 6 7 ->= 3 } The system was filtered by the following matrix interpretation of type E_J with J = {1,...,2} and dimension 3: 0 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 1 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 1 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 1 1 | \ / 2 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 3 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 4 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 5 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 6 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 7 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 8 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 9 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 10 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 11 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 12 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 13 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / 14 is interpreted by / \ | 1 0 0 | | 0 1 0 | | 0 0 0 | \ / After renaming modulo { 2->0, 3->1, 4->2, 5->3, 6->4, 7->5, 8->6, 1->7, 9->8, 10->9, 11->10, 12->11, 13->12, 14->13 }, it remains to prove termination of the 31-rule system { 0 1 2 3 ->= 4 5 6 0 4 5 6 , 0 1 2 5 ->= 4 5 6 0 4 5 7 , 0 1 2 8 ->= 4 5 6 0 4 5 2 , 0 1 2 9 ->= 4 5 6 0 4 5 10 , 6 1 2 3 ->= 2 5 6 0 4 5 6 , 6 1 2 5 ->= 2 5 6 0 4 5 7 , 6 1 2 8 ->= 2 5 6 0 4 5 2 , 6 1 2 9 ->= 2 5 6 0 4 5 10 , 3 1 2 3 ->= 8 5 6 0 4 5 6 , 3 1 2 5 ->= 8 5 6 0 4 5 7 , 3 1 2 8 ->= 8 5 6 0 4 5 2 , 3 1 2 9 ->= 8 5 6 0 4 5 10 , 0 1 ->= 1 , 0 4 ->= 4 , 0 11 ->= 11 , 6 0 ->= 6 , 6 4 ->= 2 , 3 0 ->= 3 , 3 4 ->= 8 , 12 0 ->= 12 , 1 7 ->= 1 , 7 6 ->= 6 , 7 7 ->= 7 , 7 2 ->= 2 , 7 10 ->= 10 , 5 6 ->= 3 , 5 7 ->= 5 , 5 2 ->= 8 , 5 10 ->= 9 , 13 7 ->= 13 , 4 5 ->= 1 } The system is trivially terminating.