/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_standard /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- YES proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 794c25de1cacf0d048858bcd21c9a779e1221865 marcel 20200619 unpublished dirty Termination of the given RelTRS could be proven: (0) RelTRS (1) RelTRSRRRProof [EQUIVALENT, 119 ms] (2) RelTRS (3) RelTRSRRRProof [EQUIVALENT, 6 ms] (4) RelTRS (5) RIsEmptyProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (6) YES ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: Relative term rewrite system: The relative TRS consists of the following R rules: b(b(x1)) -> c(b(c(x1))) c(c(c(x1))) -> a(x1) The relative TRS consists of the following S rules: a(x1) -> a(c(b(x1))) ---------------------------------------- (1) RelTRSRRRProof (EQUIVALENT) We used the following monotonic ordering for rule removal: Matrix interpretation [MATRO] to (N^3, +, *, >=, >) : <<< POL(b(x_1)) = [[0], [0], [2]] + [[1, 0, 1], [0, 0, 2], [0, 1, 2]] * x_1 >>> <<< POL(c(x_1)) = [[0], [0], [0]] + [[1, 1, 0], [0, 1, 2], [0, 0, 0]] * x_1 >>> <<< POL(a(x_1)) = [[0], [0], [0]] + [[1, 0, 3], [0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0]] * x_1 >>> With this ordering the following rules can be removed [MATRO] because they are oriented strictly: Rules from R: b(b(x1)) -> c(b(c(x1))) Rules from S: none ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: Relative term rewrite system: The relative TRS consists of the following R rules: c(c(c(x1))) -> a(x1) The relative TRS consists of the following S rules: a(x1) -> a(c(b(x1))) ---------------------------------------- (3) RelTRSRRRProof (EQUIVALENT) We used the following monotonic ordering for rule removal: Matrix interpretation [MATRO] to (N^2, +, *, >=, >) : <<< POL(c(x_1)) = [[0], [1]] + [[1, 2], [2, 1]] * x_1 >>> <<< POL(a(x_1)) = [[0], [2]] + [[2, 0], [0, 0]] * x_1 >>> <<< POL(b(x_1)) = [[0], [0]] + [[1, 0], [0, 0]] * x_1 >>> With this ordering the following rules can be removed [MATRO] because they are oriented strictly: Rules from R: c(c(c(x1))) -> a(x1) Rules from S: none ---------------------------------------- (4) Obligation: Relative term rewrite system: R is empty. The relative TRS consists of the following S rules: a(x1) -> a(c(b(x1))) ---------------------------------------- (5) RIsEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT) The TRS R is empty. Hence, termination is trivially proven. ---------------------------------------- (6) YES