/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/starexec_run_tct_dc /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) * Step 1: NaturalMI. WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: f(g(f(a()),h(a(),f(a())))) -> f(h(g(f(a()),a()),g(f(a()),f(a())))) - Signature: {f/1} / {a/0,g/2,h/2} - Obligation: derivational complexity wrt. signature {a,f,g,h} + Applied Processor: NaturalMI {miDimension = 2, miDegree = 1, miKind = Algebraic, uargs = NoUArgs, urules = NoURules, selector = Just any strict-rules} + Details: We apply a matrix interpretation of kind triangular matrix interpretation (containing no more than 1 non-zero interpretation-entries in the diagonal of the component-wise maxima): Following symbols are considered usable: all TcT has computed the following interpretation: p(a) = [0] [1] p(f) = [1 4] x1 + [0] [0 0] [0] p(g) = [1 0] x1 + [1 1] x2 + [0] [0 0] [0 0] [0] p(h) = [1 6] x1 + [1 0] x2 + [1] [0 0] [0 0] [0] Following rules are strictly oriented: f(g(f(a()),h(a(),f(a())))) = [15] [0] > [14] [0] = f(h(g(f(a()),a()),g(f(a()),f(a())))) Following rules are (at-least) weakly oriented: * Step 2: EmptyProcessor. WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: - Weak TRS: f(g(f(a()),h(a(),f(a())))) -> f(h(g(f(a()),a()),g(f(a()),f(a())))) - Signature: {f/1} / {a/0,g/2,h/2} - Obligation: derivational complexity wrt. signature {a,f,g,h} + Applied Processor: EmptyProcessor + Details: The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1). WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))