/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_tct_dc /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


WORST_CASE(?,O(n^2))
* Step 1: WeightGap.  WORST_CASE(?,O(n^2))
    + Considered Problem:
        - Strict TRS:
            *(*(x,y),z) -> *(x,*(y,z))
            +(*(x,y),*(a(),y)) -> *(+(x,a()),y)
        - Signature:
            {*/2,+/2} / {a/0}
        - Obligation:
             derivational complexity wrt. signature {*,+,a}
    + Applied Processor:
        WeightGap {wgDimension = 1, wgDegree = 1, wgKind = Algebraic, wgUArgs = NoUArgs, wgOn = WgOnAny}
    + Details:
        The weightgap principle applies using the following nonconstant growth matrix-interpretation:
          We apply a matrix interpretation of kind triangular matrix interpretation:
          
          Following symbols are considered usable:
            all
          TcT has computed the following interpretation:
            p(*) = [1] x1 + [1] x2 + [1]
            p(+) = [1] x1 + [1] x2 + [5]
            p(a) = [0]                  
          
          Following rules are strictly oriented:
          +(*(x,y),*(a(),y)) = [1] x + [2] y + [7]
                             > [1] x + [1] y + [6]
                             = *(+(x,a()),y)      
          
          
          Following rules are (at-least) weakly oriented:
          *(*(x,y),z) =  [1] x + [1] y + [1] z + [2]
                      >= [1] x + [1] y + [1] z + [2]
                      =  *(x,*(y,z))                
          
        Further, it can be verified that all rules not oriented are covered by the weightgap condition.
* Step 2: NaturalMI.  WORST_CASE(?,O(n^2))
    + Considered Problem:
        - Strict TRS:
            *(*(x,y),z) -> *(x,*(y,z))
        - Weak TRS:
            +(*(x,y),*(a(),y)) -> *(+(x,a()),y)
        - Signature:
            {*/2,+/2} / {a/0}
        - Obligation:
             derivational complexity wrt. signature {*,+,a}
    + Applied Processor:
        NaturalMI {miDimension = 2, miDegree = 2, miKind = Algebraic, uargs = NoUArgs, urules = NoURules, selector = Just any strict-rules}
    + Details:
        We apply a matrix interpretation of kind triangular matrix interpretation:
        
        Following symbols are considered usable:
          all
        TcT has computed the following interpretation:
          p(*) = [1 1] x1 + [1 0] x2 + [3]
                 [0 1]      [0 1]      [2]
          p(+) = [1 0] x1 + [1 2] x2 + [1]
                 [0 1]      [0 0]      [4]
          p(a) = [1]                      
                 [1]                      
        
        Following rules are strictly oriented:
        *(*(x,y),z) = [1 2] x + [1 1] y + [1 0] z + [8]
                      [0 1]     [0 1]     [0 1]     [4]
                    > [1 1] x + [1 1] y + [1 0] z + [6]
                      [0 1]     [0 1]     [0 1]     [4]
                    = *(x,*(y,z))                      
        
        
        Following rules are (at-least) weakly oriented:
        +(*(x,y),*(a(),y)) =  [1 1] x + [2 2] y + [15]
                              [0 1]     [0 1]     [6] 
                           >= [1 1] x + [1 0] y + [11]
                              [0 1]     [0 1]     [6] 
                           =  *(+(x,a()),y)           
        
* Step 3: EmptyProcessor.  WORST_CASE(?,O(1))
    + Considered Problem:
        - Weak TRS:
            *(*(x,y),z) -> *(x,*(y,z))
            +(*(x,y),*(a(),y)) -> *(+(x,a()),y)
        - Signature:
            {*/2,+/2} / {a/0}
        - Obligation:
             derivational complexity wrt. signature {*,+,a}
    + Applied Processor:
        EmptyProcessor
    + Details:
        The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1).

WORST_CASE(?,O(n^2))